- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So-called "moon landing"
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:52 pm to BayouBlitz
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:52 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Whenever a post starts out "You have to be ignorant.." you are about to read something super retarded.
I've yet to read an intelligent post by you. Are you reetarded?
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:52 pm to MikeD
quote:
Have you ever gone outside at dusk on a clear night and seen the satellites or the ISS streak across the sky? I have many times and they are definitely not stationary
That's just God trolling all you doubting telescopic heathens.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:53 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
Are you reetarded?

Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:54 pm to Scuttle But
quote:
Where did the idea that we lost or destroyed the technology to go to the moon come from?
NASA
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:55 pm to JamesVinson
quote:
I need to watch that because I thoroughly enjoy Ricky's stuff.
It was a podcast with Ricky and Stephen Merchant that they animated over and presented as a half hour talk show-deal. The crux of it was that the producer, Karl Pilkington, had the most absurd beliefs based on half remembered stories. They ask Karl questions then make fun of him relentlessly.
Example: In the first episode Karl relays how Nasa trained a monkey to fly a spaceship by the use of a banana dispenser, which dolled out bananas based on the monkey pressing the correct navigational controls.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:56 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
That's the little monkey fella bit, yeah?
Posted on 2/21/24 at 2:59 pm to JamesVinson
quote:
That's the little monkey fella bit, yeah?
I actually think that's the one where Karl Relays a story about a female scientist who falls in love with a monkey and abandons her husband to live with the monkey...Karl talks a good bit about monkeys lol
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:02 pm to Liberator
quote:
You've already claimed to see a "curved" horizon.
I see it multiple times a week.
quote:
We are all going to see a flat horizon with the edges "turned up". That does NOT "prove" a concave, "round" earth. It proves an anomaly of human optical lens.
The problem I’m having with this theory is that the horizon appears to be flat if I’m standing on the ground, but once I reach a certain altitude, not only is the horizon curved, it appears to become more curved the higher I go.
quote:
GPS satellite system: Balloons = "Satellites".
the balloon float above us in stationary positions
What are the white lights that move rapidly across the night sky? Sometimes you can see multiple at the same time. What’s going on there? We’ve been told our whole lives that those are satellites. If those aren’t satellites, what are they?
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:03 pm to JamesVinson
Monkey News
Completely forgot that Monkey News became a weekly trope. I need to re-listen to this show lol
Completely forgot that Monkey News became a weekly trope. I need to re-listen to this show lol
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:04 pm to TigerGman
quote:
You couldn't possibly be more clueless.
I've yet to see anyone here, including you, provide firsthand experience in going to the moon. It's nothing but insults. All of you are spoonfed this notion we went to the moon, most of us weren't even alive then.
How the frick does anyone here know we went to the moon unless they themselves stepped foot on it? We have TV, video, images, radio transmissions, etc and yet NASA lost this technology.
It's impossible for man to fly to the moon in a rocket. 50 years later with 1 million times the technology, man has never put his feet on anything solid in outer space since.
Russia, China, India, Germany, or any other country has never put a man on the moon. They simply believed every word of the AstroNots here. We print money like newspapers and we can't go back if we tried. It's a load of bullshite.
Since you have a clue TigerGman, enlighten us. I want t leave this thread being a believer and I want you to fricking make it happen. No excuses. The ball is in your court.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:07 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
I recently rewatched a bit of life's too short and the Liam neeson scene kills me every time.
And Johnny depps scene too.

And Johnny depps scene too.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:11 pm to CAD703X
quote:
technology advances every day; imagine doing a 50 years-later peer review scrutiny of 1960s engineering & moon spaceship records.
A piece of shite intercontinental ballistic missile my grandpa worked on the 50s did its last mission to space in 2018. Things haven't changed that much. The Russians are still using soyuz, 6 decades later. In case your really don't think OG designs have held up beyond 50 years.
This post was edited on 2/21/24 at 3:12 pm
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:12 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:
They ask Karl questions then make fun of him relentlessly.
So basically the same thing that everyone here does to liberator?
This post was edited on 2/21/24 at 3:13 pm
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:14 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
How the frick does anyone here know we went to the moon unless they themselves stepped foot on it?
You'd be a blast to be on jury duty with.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:15 pm to billjamin
Lol yeah, I called him Karl in my post prior to that one.
I also just had this thought, if we’re using the Bible to say that all the stars and planets in the sky are fake, then why does the Bible make so many references to cosmology and specific constellations?
I also just had this thought, if we’re using the Bible to say that all the stars and planets in the sky are fake, then why does the Bible make so many references to cosmology and specific constellations?
This post was edited on 2/21/24 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:17 pm to Liberator
quote:
Now NASA main focus is "muh-Weather" and "Global Warming" -- which have ZIP, ZERO, NADA to do with "Space".
((( Any NASA fanbois here want to comment on THIS?? )))
I'm not a fanboy, but you are aware that the first A in NASA stands for "atmospheric", aren't you?
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:18 pm to SCLSUMuddogs
quote:
I also just had this thought, if we’re using the Bible to say that all the stars and planets in the sky are fake, then why does the Bible make so many references to cosmology and specific constellations?
Well that part wasn't meant to be literal. Only the convenient parts are actually literal.
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:19 pm to saintsfan1977
quote:
Since you have a clue TigerGman, enlighten us. I want t leave this thread being a believer and I want you to fricking make it happen. No excuses. The ball is in your court.
You can't even explain why the Russians never exposed the hoax.
quote:
It's impossible for man to fly to the moon in a rocket.
quote:
It's impossible for man to fly to the moon in a rocket.
Pretty sure the burden's on you to explain through basic physics why this is impossible.
Oh and by the way, idiot.
ETA: Still waiting for the OP to respond to the Russia exposure of the hoax question.
This post was edited on 2/21/24 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 2/21/24 at 3:20 pm to Nutriaitch
quote:
I'm not a fanboy, but you are aware that the first A in NASA stands for "atmospheric", aren't you?
It stands for aeronautics

National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Popular
Back to top
