- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Smith Shooter's Lawyer "My Client Was Not The Aggressor"
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:39 pm to rsbd
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:39 pm to rsbd
quote:
Then he should have not followed Smith. Once he followed he lost the right to defend himself from someone that was maybe going to get a weapon.
Followed him? How much have you drank tonight?
There was a car accident.
2
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:40 pm to Lester Earl
Shots were fired across the vehicle from driver to passengers side. You can not assume some one is going to do something and use deadly force.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:41 pm to csorre1
Nola.com
guys were arguing, things seemed to started to escalate. one of the men removed their shirt. Guy(witness) went inside to get his phone
guys were arguing, things seemed to started to escalate. one of the men removed their shirt. Guy(witness) went inside to get his phone
This post was edited on 4/10/16 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:41 pm to Lester Earl
When smith returned to his vehicle.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:44 pm to rsbd
you keep changing your narrative when someone prover your allegations false
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:44 pm to rsbd
Where did he follow him from? Give me the details
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:45 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Followed him? How much have you drank tonight?
There was a car accident.
This dude's own attorney said he followed Smith to get his license plate. He's claiming he was the victim of a hit and run by Smith or the people in the Impala earlier.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:45 pm to Lester Earl
Where was Smith hit? I heard back and leg
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:45 pm to Asgard Device
quote:
Uh. Reading comprehension?
Allegedly the perp's father was killed by a cop. That cop happened to have been involved in some way. Not just as a responder.
Yep. He was there when father was killed.
Never said he responded.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:45 pm to tduecen
LOL ok I guess in time we will see who is correct
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:46 pm to rsbd
Well it won't be you since you've given several "opinions" so far and been disproved a few times already.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:47 pm to MightyYat
quote:
This dude's own attorney said he followed Smith to get his license plate. He's claiming he was the victim of a hit and run by Smith or the people in the Impala earlier.
Yea, poster is saying once he caught up with Smith and they got out the car, he followed Smith back to his car and just shot him
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:47 pm to MightyYat
quote:
This dude's own attorney said he followed Smith to get his license plate. He's claiming he was the victim of a hit and run by Smith or the people in the Impala earlier.
By law puts him in the wrong and gives him no legal right for self defense. He is guilty, it's over.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:48 pm to rsbd
quote:
Shots were fired across the vehicle from driver to passengers side. You can not assume some one is going to do something and use deadly force.
Of course you can.
That's the whole basis of stand your ground.
If you canconvincely claim you had a reasonable fear then juries let you go.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:48 pm to rsbd
quote:
By law puts him in the wrong and gives him no legal right for self defense. He is guilty, it's over.
wait, its wrong to follow a car that hit & ran your vehicle?
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:48 pm to SirSaintly
The law is an arse... And, Facts are not fair. That is why they are facts. Time will tell. Surveillance cameras may provide relevant info beyond the spin...
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:49 pm to magildachunks
quote:
quote: Shots were fired across the vehicle from driver to passengers side. You can not assume some one is going to do something and use deadly force. Of course you can. That's the whole basis of stand your ground. If you canconvincely claim you had a reasonable fear then juries let you go.
Depends. You cant escalate a situation and then claim stand your ground
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:49 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Yea, poster is saying once he caught up with Smith and they got out the car, he followed Smith back to his car and just shot him
Well, being shot in the back in the driver's seat probably means Smith was reaching towards the center console when he got popped meaning Smith was seated at the wheel and the shooter was outside he vehicle. He had to have followed Smith back to his car.
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:50 pm to rsbd
quote:
Then he should have not followed Smith. Once he followed he lost the right to defend himself from someone that was maybe going to get a weapon.
What are your thoughts on the Trayvon Martin case?
Posted on 4/10/16 at 8:50 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Should be easy to prove that looking at the cars.
IF someone rear ends you, there is no law that allows you to follow, stalk, wreck, and murder them.
That part of his lawyers comment is useless. To me, it shows he was the aggressor at the time of him murdering Smith.
What's he gonna say.."he hit my car, so I followed him for blocks, rear ended him, and shot his ads because I feared for my life"?
I'm sure that defense will work!
Page 3 of 108
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News