- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Smith Shooter's Lawyer "My Client Was Not The Aggressor"
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:27 pm to KillerNut9
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:27 pm to KillerNut9
Check out lesters pic
0
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:27 pm to Lester Earl
Informative pic
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:27 pm to Lester Earl
I don't know if he'll ultimately be exonerated, but the shooter's actions after don't match up with someone who just murdered someone in cold blood and knows he's culpable.
That's what keeps eating at me.
That's what keeps eating at me.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:27 pm to lsupride87
im pretty sure thats the light.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:28 pm to Lester Earl
That is an odd intersection. Still seems like he stops sooooo short. Especially when he braked exactly to white line at the light before.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:29 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
I don't know if he'll ultimately be exonerated, but the shooter's actions after don't match up with someone who just murdered someone in cold blood and knows he's culpable.
I don't think it's too crazy to think he may have actually feared for his life. The ultimate question is, why was Smith shot in the back?
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:31 pm to Sofa King Crimson
Biggest factor IMO will be if they find a gun in Smith's car. I feel like it would already been reported if they did, but I have zero clue on timeframes behind these types of cases.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:31 pm to Sofa King Crimson
Witness said Smith said I have a gun then shooter said I have one too. If Smith was reaching for a gun, then shooter pulled trigger before waiting to find out.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:32 pm to bencoleman
quote:
That's right. He's a stupid dipshit. He started a fight and murdered a man. Let that sink in. He started a fight and murdered a man over something fricking stupid
and smith is alive if he pulls over and exchanges info with the guy he rear ended like any law abiding citizen would do. If you want to talk stupid
You also don't know why smith was murdered but keep pretending you do I guess
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:32 pm to Lester Earl
Not sure what that video has to do with being a murderer. The defense will probably spend 5 minutes on that. The only events that matter is what transpired after Hayes ran into Smith, ending with the police showing up. The actions in that video will not exonerate him and won't hold in water in the court of law. What it does is it gives us a scenario to work with and something to talk about.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:32 pm to KillerNut9
Here is a nice picture showing Chad being wrong only a mere two hours ago. Here was a fact Chad had
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:33 pm to KillerNut9
it looks like he stopped around 100-130 feet before the light. but again, if the cops show up smith is getting the ticket and is at fault for following too close failure to yield type shite.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:33 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Witness said Smith said I have a gun then shooter said I have one too. If Smith was reaching for a gun, then shooter pulled trigger before waiting to find out.
Right. Say Smith claimed he had one while they were talking shite and then ran to his car. Does Hayes have to confirm there is a gun before shooting?
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:33 pm to KillerNut9
quote:
That is an odd intersection. Still seems like he stops sooooo short. Especially when he braked exactly to white line at the light before.
Maybe there was a car in front of him or he thought someone was coming out into the road. That's a busy street with plenty of drunk people
This post was edited on 4/11/16 at 10:36 pm
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:33 pm to SirSaintly
I don't know how it works in other places, but up here in Live Free or Die country, if another driver so much as looks at you funny -much less honks their horn, flips a bird, etc.- one usually just pulls out the old heater and pumps them full of lead. I mean, drivers being dicks deserve to die and it's even worth your own death trying to set them straight, right?
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:34 pm to 13SaintTiger
are you a lawyer?
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:35 pm to Sofa King Crimson
quote:
quote:
Witness said Smith said I have a gun then shooter said I have one too. If Smith was reaching for a gun, then shooter pulled trigger before waiting to find out.
Right. Say Smith claimed he had one while they were talking shite and then ran to his car. Does Hayes have to confirm there is a gun before shooting?
That will be the ultimate question. How long do u have to wait to find out?
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:37 pm to boosiebadazz
He could just be a dumbass. He may think he was justified and still be wrong.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:37 pm to tigerskin
the lawyer said there was a 2nd gun.
i know, i know, he's supposed to defend him.
but he was dead on about Smith hitting and running before there was any video of that.
i know, i know, he's supposed to defend him.
but he was dead on about Smith hitting and running before there was any video of that.
Posted on 4/11/16 at 10:38 pm to Sofa King Crimson
quote:
Does Hayes have to confirm there is a gun before shooting?
Most people well versed in the law would say yes
Hayes' lawyer is likely facing an uphill battle with the wounds in Smith's back. If he (smith) indeed did have a gun and was shot in the chest, he (Hayes lawyer) would have a strong defense imo
This post was edited on 4/11/16 at 10:40 pm
Page 28 of 108
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News