Started By
Message

re: Shreveport second circuit Court rules Oschner cannot fire or discipline employees

Posted on 10/30/21 at 12:11 am to
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30041 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 12:11 am to
quote:

This is a lie


6 weeks technically unless you count instances where there was an issue in manufacturing, which is a totally different issue.


This ruling is interesting in the face of yesterday's SCOTUS decision not to allow injunctive relief in the First District Does v. Mills case out of Maine.

Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 1:44 am to
quote:

We are an at-will state, like most states. So, an employer can pretty much mandate whatever he wants,” said attorney Gregory Miller.


Until those mandates violate laws and civil rights.

You can’t fire someone based on skin color in an at will state.

Firing people because they won’t vaxx due to religious reasons is a federal civil rights issue.
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52944 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 6:32 am to
quote:

6 weeks technically unless you count instances where there was an issue in manufacturing, which is a totally different issue.



Again this is a lie, which doesn't lend much credence to covidians like yourself.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108616 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Firing people because they won’t vaxx due to religious reasons is a federal civil rights issue.

And Ochsner doesn’t do that. They allow religious exemptions. Those people with religious exemptions go into the mandatory testing protocol.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12226 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 7:20 am to
quote:

Firing people because they won’t vaxx due to religious reasons is a federal civil rights issue.
But firing people who are too dumb, lazy, or obstinate to request a religious exemption isn't.
This post was edited on 10/30/21 at 7:21 am
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
52944 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 7:28 am to
quote:

lsupride87


Your meltdown in this thread has been impressive
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
73317 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 7:37 am to
you love you som vaccine mandate threads considering you don’t support them.
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8680 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 7:42 am to
quote:

However, in this case it has to do with whether or not the company is firing someone who is exercising their civil right (not to be mandated to take the vaccine which hasn't been ruled on yet). So, imho your question is premature.


A private company can fire you for exercising your civil right. So what's different about this one?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108616 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 7:43 am to
quote:

you love you som vaccine mandate threads considering you don’t support them.
I have told you this entire time I absolutely support an employers right to mandate a vaccine. You really need to keep up. You also told me you agree with this, but we all know you would rather the govt step in and be daddy and tell companies what to do
This post was edited on 10/30/21 at 7:44 am
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
73317 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 7:45 am to
your butthurt knows no bounds on this subject

and as i’ve told you from the beginning, i support an employees right to choose. because the ends don’t justify the means in this situation nor has it ever with COVID, despite what you wish…
This post was edited on 10/30/21 at 7:50 am
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
43960 posts
Posted on 10/30/21 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Not a single conservative should support this ruling.


The court ruling only applies while the case is being the decided in court.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram