- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/26/18 at 9:45 am to STEVED00
You can turn the beep/alert off as easy as not using the cameras.
Can’t imagine not using the camera but it came at a higher cost having the all around view.
Can’t imagine not using the camera but it came at a higher cost having the all around view.
Posted on 5/26/18 at 9:46 am to STEVED00
You should let your husband drive
Posted on 5/26/18 at 10:14 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Yes. There's a reason many industrial sites require backup beepers and none require cameras
Because people usually walk aimlessly with their head in the clouds?
Posted on 5/26/18 at 10:23 am to tigerinthebueche
Cameras are an enhancement to the required mirrors which Is your primary protection (visual) for hitting something that is not in front or side of you while driving. The audible proximity sensor alarm is a secondary audio protection if your primary visual protection fails you (probably bc you were not using it).
I just think a true secondary level of protection is a better requirement than an enhanced primary level of protection if the powers that be were to require additional protection be installed on new vehicles.
I just think a true secondary level of protection is a better requirement than an enhanced primary level of protection if the powers that be were to require additional protection be installed on new vehicles.
Popular
Back to top

1






