- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SB63 (St. George Parish-wide Vote Bill) LIVE STREAM Senate Committee
Posted on 5/9/19 at 1:54 pm to OysterPoBoy
Posted on 5/9/19 at 1:54 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
With SG leaving the parish
Since we're "breaking away", all you Livingston and Ascension folks can start telling us how great we are and maybe we'll join you. Gifts would help too.
ETA: Iberville can get in on this too.
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 1:57 pm
Posted on 5/9/19 at 1:54 pm to Mahootney
quote:
StG has been paying more than its fair share for years.
It's essentially a status quo anyway.
Why they thought it would be a silver bullet is beyond me.
Haven't they realized by now that the StG people know WAY more about the financials than these "Senators"?
When your entire argument is based in lies, you kind of don't have anything better to fall back on. They were grasping at straws. I loved watching SWB's body language in the hearing. She needs a drink.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 1:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:They are forgetting which group of people they are pandering to.
i think the fact that StG is more educated and has been very involved in this process, they're not going to fall for that
The StG people typically aren't the ones that fall for these types of tactics.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 1:57 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
With SG leaving the parish that's gonna leave a big hole for them to fill regarding services. It may have an effect.
This is false. Just like Central, the idea is to continue using Parish services where feasible (trash/sewer/water/etc). This also means they will continue paying their fair share for those services. You're going to find that the most adversely affected services are typically the City's bloat.
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:The good thing about this is that the whole state gets to vote on it.
so how long until they move for a St George school district?
We all know EBR will try to vote it down, but how many people in Lake Chuck, Shreveport, Ruston, Alex, Nola, Ascension, Livingston, etc do you really think will deny families the opportunity to get their own school district?
My thoughts... not many. That's why Zachary and Central passed.
If StG gets a city, they'll get an ISD.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:07 pm to Mahootney
your problem will be EBR parish, not the state
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:10 pm to Mahootney
And Baton Rouge has now announced it will file a lawsuit to force the entire parish to be able to vote on St George. Should be just about the quickest lawsuit around. They have no legal basis to claim that the entire parish should vote on incorporation. I can’t wait to hear their theory.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
School district application is more complicated that incorporating if I remember correctly. The incorporation is step 1 to getting to a school district though.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:11 pm to BR Tiger
About the only way it doesn’t get tossed with prejudice immediately is if a judge of the quality of Trudy White gets the case.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:12 pm to teke184
quote:
if a judge of the quality of Trudy White gets the case.
didn't she just switch to civil?
#DeepState
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:13 pm to BR Tiger
quote:
And Baton Rouge has now announced it will file a lawsuit to force the entire parish to be able to vote on St George.
on what fricking grounds?
i don't even think the law at issue would pass constitutional muster. now BR is suing for StG for following the ACTUAL law and is arguing that a likely unconstitutional law (that doesn't actually exist) should be the legal guiding point?
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Would the 18th JDC handle this or would it need to go to federal court?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:13 pm to Mahootney
It's so asanine that the whole state has to vote on a new school district in one parish. Another reason to blow up the state constitution.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:14 pm to teke184
quote:
Would the 18th JDC handle this or would it need to go to federal court?
19th JDC unless they file a federal civil rights suit, which i imagine will be done. then that on would be in federal court
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:17 pm to BR Tiger
quote:
And Baton Rouge has now announced it will file a lawsuit to force the entire parish to be able to vote on St George
And in the process wasting more taxpayer money and proving the incompetency people are trying to separate from.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:17 pm to teke184
it is cute how the DEMs were arguing they were trying to stop wasteful government expansion
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:18 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
I really don't have a dog in the fight, I hope StG does separate though.
Wait, what would St. George be "separating" from exactly?
It's not separating from Baton Rouge, because it isn't part of Baton Rouge...it's just a section of unincorporated land that the city-parish government takes taxes from and then redistributes to the rest of the parish...
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
MOP is connected, so hopefully the StG stakeholders have hired competent representation to counter her filings.
We are pulling for you StG guys down here in the 504.
We are pulling for you StG guys down here in the 504.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 2:22 pm to Solo
quote:
MOP is connected, so hopefully the StG stakeholders have hired competent representation to counter her filings.
she's a private attorney though, correct? she can't file obo EBR or BR, correct?
Popular
Back to top


0





