- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rush Limbaugh thinks evolution is a hoax because gorilla never became human
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:32 pm to GeauxTigerTM
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:32 pm to GeauxTigerTM
An even better book:


Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:32 pm to themunch
quote:
themunch
Good work, take a victory lap and meet back here so we can settle the age of the earth debate.
quote:
Fun Bunch
Hang your head in shame, your side just lost and you are dumb.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:33 pm to LucasP
It was certainly a very compelling argument. 
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:34 pm to slackster
quote:
Or to put it another way, if there was originally a Patient Zero primate, and he/she mutated with a beneficial trait, over the course of many generations it would seem that the beneficial trait would eventually dominate the species because the evolved primate had all of the advantages of regular primates PLUS the mutation - sort of like upgrading the trim level on a car
When two groups of the same species spread out, they may become geographically isolated from one another. The first population may continue to live without really changing over time. However, the other population may need to undergo a series of adaptations to survive.
If the two populations become reproductively isolated from one another, over many generations the two groups can form two distinct species. When the populations become isolated, there is no longer gene flow which prevents any new traits from being shared.
Speciation in animals appears to happen on a geological time scale, and hence why many people have trouble coming to terms with it.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:35 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
It was certainly a very compelling argument.
It definitely blew my mind
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:35 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
what in the frick.
This reminds me of the good old days when we were allowed to argue about evolution over on the PoliBoard...

Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:35 pm to MrSmith
Success is a beautiful thing.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:35 pm to Napoleon
quote:
It astounds me that this guy is seen by so many to be the preeminent voice in politics.
He has stated many times before that he is entertainment.
I used to like him but he gets on my last nerve now.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:37 pm to Bmath
quote:
When the populations become isolated, there is no longer gene flow which prevents any new traits from being shared.
This is called allopatric speciation
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:39 pm to Bmath
To put it another way, most traits are not purely beneficial or detrimental Ina vacuum. Flatter teeth are better for chewing vegetables, while sharper teeth are better for cutting through meat. A geographically isolated primate population which has a different (meat heavier) diet could adapt toward sharper teeth, while a population that subsists on vegetable adapts toward flatter teeth.
If the geographic locations were reversed each beneficial trait would become detrimental. Hence the two environments drive the two populations further apart, causing speciation.
If the geographic locations were reversed each beneficial trait would become detrimental. Hence the two environments drive the two populations further apart, causing speciation.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:39 pm to themunch
quote:
Success is a beautiful thing.
I love that you think that you are making a successful argument and everyone isn't just being sarcastic with you.
Bless your heart.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:39 pm to JamalSanders
It's likely that multiple genes contribute, as well as genetic modifications, and environmental factors. Scientists will probably never find a "gay gene" just as they will never find a "fat gene". But that doesn't mean that genes don't play a role.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:43 pm to themunch
quote:
Primates were evolving but now do not. Or did you find some new ones somewhere out there?
It takes hundreds/thousands/millions of generations before new traits generally become widely manifest, and for speciation to take place, assuming a change of environment or some other factor in which adaptability would prove beneficial. In the past 150 years that Evolution as an idea has been around a primate specific speciation event has not been observed because it is an incredibly small time frame on an Evolutionary scale. Does not mean evolution is somehow debunked. Additionally, there is likely not going to be a single, naturally occurring at least, birth where you can pin-pointedly say this offspring is a different species from it's parents.
In other species though evolution has been observable, i.e. wheat plants, some studies done on butterflies, etc.
Edit: It always amazes me when this topic is brought up how many people either did not take a biology class or just dismissed all the evidence put in front of them because "the bible says...".
This post was edited on 6/1/16 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:44 pm to uway
quote:
That's assuming that sexuality is binary, which is obviously a faulty assumption
I think I see your point but can you elaborate. The person I was responding to was also faulty in his assumption that sexuality determines ones ability or desire to reproduce.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:48 pm to TigerTalker142
I do not debunk the fact that species can evolve or change as such. I just do not grasp one species changing into another. Because one species has similar items of anatomy does not mean necessarily that they are some how related or have common ancestry.
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:49 pm to themunch
quote:
Rush talks way too much.
He should do other things on his radio show besides talk
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:51 pm to WalkingTurtles
quote:
Relax there rainbow warrior
just doing my part for the homo community
Posted on 6/1/16 at 3:51 pm to themunch
quote:
Because one species has similar items of anatomy does not mean necessarily that they are some how related or have common ancestry.
You're right. A lot of the taxonomic trees established by Linnaeus and his contemporaries have been heavily updated with advances in molecular biology. We now can use phylogenetics to look at percent relatedness based on genome comparisons.
Popular
Back to top


0









