Started By
Message

re: Runnels School Closing - Not Just High School

Posted on 3/10/20 at 7:04 pm to
Posted by Wiseguy
Member since Mar 2020
4069 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Are they getting paid in addition to free tuition?


Yes- some very little, some quite a bit more. And from what I’ve heard there’s no rhyme or reason other than what the Runnels decided to pay someone.

I don’t know if the 6M includes refunds owed. I would love to get my hands on the actual financial records.
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
8068 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 8:38 pm to
Interesting findings thanks for that.

quote:

Keep in mind that while they may be made whole on their property losses, they likely incurred losses of revenue and other operating expenses that may not be covered.


My understanding is Runnels school had flood insurance for the buildings but not for the contents. There were a lot of losses of books, AV equipment, instruments, computers, etc but it is my understanding lots of private parties stepped up with donations.

quote:

They owed about 1.3 million to related parties and about 2.8 million to unrelated parties. Most of the related parties debt is to "Lynn K. Runnels and Runnels Properties". So someone related was absolutely propping up the school.


Lynn K Runnels is Dr. Kelly Runnels himself. I have no idea if he has an LLC set up or what to lease the property back to the school or loan the school money. Mr. Runnels claim all along is they have been operating in the red the past 10 years and he has been personally making up the difference all this time. His inability to continue doing so is what led to the initial "plea for help" (a 40% HS tuition increase) which claimed all of the issues were a lack of enrollment and high cost per student in the HS due to AP programs and having to hire certified teachers for HS. "The HS costs $2MM a year to run by itself" was a quote I remember. Which, back then, I was like you have 232 students at an average of $10k a piece so what's the problem? Well, not nearly all of them were paying students...

quote:

7) One last thing, and this may be the most telling of all. They had 2.85M of deferred revenue. My initial assumption is that represents those who prepay tuition in full.


This is a reasonable number and with roughly 50% of 500-700 people paying 8-16k each you get to roughly those numbers. This explains how far behind they are as of today. Not to mention people who have paid 2-3 years in advance or people who have paid for all of HS in advance (yes there are some). There should be buckets of deferred income for 2021 and beyond. This is a classic example of robbing Peter to pay Paul...

quote:

The "good" news is that, especially if the balance of FEMA money came in, they should be able to sell the buildings and repay everyone their tuition prepayments.


Yeah I'm not sure what is owed and by whom and when. In order to sell you have to have a buyer and there is a limited market for a property like this. I do find it interesting that the WBRZ story reported the plan is to sell the school in about 2 years. Not sure what happens in two years time other than someone has to pay to keep up the place with no students inside.

Another poster said they would love to see the financials. Depending on how good or bad this ends for the creditors (I'll put the people like myself that prepaid tuition in that category) the financials may well end up as part of public record soon enough in legal proceedings.

I've seen the Sheriff pickup GC's who have welched on progress payments as part of new construction for a few hundred K. The 2+ million that is spent and gone and as yet outstanding is a serious felony size number.

While I'm not happy to be one of the prepaid tuition people who may be SOL on their money, I'm also glad I'm not Kelly Runnels or one of the members of the board.

Posted by dixiechick
Member since Sep 2017
918 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 9:24 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/1/20 at 7:58 am
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6032 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 8:16 am to
No cafeteria at runnels
Posted by Mr Mom
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2012
797 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 10:02 am to
Firing Dr Brandao was the death knell for Runnels. It proved they weren't willing to improve. Dr Runnels was still the head of the board after he "retired". He thought he had hired a "yes man" in Dr Brandao and he couldn't have been more wrong.

The accounting at Runnels is atrocious. They operated the school for years with 1 checking account. In other words, all of the donated money from the parents organization was mixed with tuition and fees. Of course Dr Runnels couldn't let Dr Brandao apply for federal grants and accreditations. That would require government agencies to review their financials and that would be detrimental, possibly criminal. It is starting to look like that may end up happening anyway.
Posted by dixiechick
Member since Sep 2017
918 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 10:33 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/1/20 at 7:42 am
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6032 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 11:22 am to
You really are speaking of an issue without any knowledge. I was there when Brandao was there and he immediately engaged parents about what they wanted from the school. He improved the technology and actually instituted an employee handbook that had never existed before. He tried to create a normal pay scale and address the lacking health insurance issue. Most parents were shocked, and lied to by Runnels in a circumstance not unlike what just happened. Many alumni were rebuffed for inquiring about the issues and 15 % of the families did not return the next year and their enrollment took a 20% hit. Brandoa is at St. Thomas More and instilling much of the strategies that were trying to take place at Runnels. Friends of mine moved their kids from Runnels there 2 years ago and several families followed or bailed and went to other schools - at least a dozen went to St. George or Jean Vianney. Runnels has been lying for at least a couple of decades when he turned down an industry lead STEM opportunity. Several parents, two of whom I know, were brought in to be part of the financial committee for the school. They left when Brandoa was let go. They had been at the school for 10 years and one was an alumni. I believe they were all held to a gag order from speaking about anything they knew.
Posted by dixiechick
Member since Sep 2017
918 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 11:35 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/30/20 at 12:21 pm
Posted by Wiseguy
Member since Mar 2020
4069 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 11:44 am to
quote:

dixiechick


Is your tinfoil hat a bit too tight? Grants, whether government or private, are the lifeblood of any private school. No successful private school exists on tuition alone. This was another part of the problem at Runnels. They have never had a professional development office with a concerted effort to raise funds through grants, sponsorships, and alumni giving. They have had someone with the title of development officer but it wasn’t a priority and it wasn’t someone who had a proven track record doing so.

“Letting the government in?” Newsflash- the government is in already. The government sets the standards that schools must comply with in order to maintain legal status as diploma granting institutions. The government receives a form 990 every year. The government receives payroll taxes.

This may have started as “poor accounting skills” by well-intentioned kind hearted people. At some point it became a deliberate cover up of gross mismanagement bordering on fraud (and I think I’m being generous by saying “bordering on”).
Posted by yaherrdme
The Place to Be
Member since Feb 2004
5875 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 11:46 am to
quote:

To do that would destroy the identity of the school he built.


LOL..what is the identity now ?
Posted by Wiseguy
Member since Mar 2020
4069 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 11:47 am to
If 15% would have left with the changes Brandao was going to implement we wouldn’t be here today. We would have had teachers and staff paying at least a portion of their kids tuition. That alone would have taken care of a lot of this problem. There also would have been new families who would have come in the following couple years because of the leadership of Dr Brandao. He has a stellar reputation everywhere he Hs ever been except for a handful of disgruntled/scared folks at Runnels.
Posted by winkchance
St. George, LA
Member since Jul 2016
6032 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 12:02 pm to
"15 percent of the families and staff would have left had he continued with the suggestions from Brandao"

Yeah, those %15 were the ones not paying tuition and had no teaching credentials. Again, you have no idea what you are talking about.
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
8068 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

To do that would destroy the identity of the school he built.


Well I guess Runnels really proved his point didn’t he. I guess having no school is better than having one run like a business?

The failure of Runnels is just like how all all socialist experiments end. You always run out of other people’s money to spend. There weren’t enough paying people for all of the people who got the free stuff.

I guess their idea of a budget was to look at the general account and see if the balance was positive.

Posted by extremetigerfanatic
Member since Oct 2003
5826 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 1:10 pm to
It sounds like they ran the school about like how Matt Morris ran complete construction. There are laws about this crap.
Posted by sec13rowBBseat28
St George, LA
Member since Aug 2006
15756 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

The failure of Runnels is just like how all all socialist experiments end. You always run out of other people’s money to spend. There weren’t enough paying people for all of the people who got the free stuff.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
40133 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Wow...how kind, and just the response I would expect from someone who makes a living from taxpayers subsidizing ( Just a little...right) their business


You must have me confused with someone else. My job certainly isn't subsidized by the government. I volunteer with a non-profit that gets no direct government funding, but does have government pay for things for our group. I, along with the rest of our board, take no pay from this organization, though.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
40133 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

but I don’t think the Runnels wanted gov grants (regardless of their accounting mess) considering they were running a private school. Why would someone willingly invite the gov into their private school?


You keep saying that... yet... the school was taking government grants for operating expenses to the tune of 60K - 80K per year (granted, that's not much compared to a public school, but it is still "something").

Not to mention, he took government money for rebuilding.

Also, the state still has to grant approval to offer state-sanctioned diplomas.

"Private" schools aren't as private as you think they are.
Posted by Brummy
Central, LA
Member since Oct 2009
4661 posts
Posted on 3/11/20 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

I don’t think the Runnels wanted gov grants (regardless of their accounting mess) considering they were running a private school. Why would someone willingly invite the gov into their private school?

LFH showed you the returns, signed by Runnels himself, stating that they received government grants - not only did they want them, they applied for and received them. Are you in total denial that these people don't share your world view on this?

quote:

I still don’t understand the hiring of Brandao( complete opposite of everything Runnels stood for)

It seems Runnels stood for poorly managing a school and deceptively taking people's advance tuition money to float himself while he tried to figure out his exit strategy. So yes, I'll agree that Dr. Brandao is the opposite of that.
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
8068 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:26 am to
Update

Prepaid tuition families have been sent forms with a release to fill out and mail to get refunds.

It says the refund will take 3 weeks.
Posted by Evil Little Thing
Member since Jul 2013
11584 posts
Posted on 3/13/20 at 9:31 am to
I hope it’s true & you get your refunds. Keep us posted.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram