re: Question about Jim Crow laws from a Yankee.

quote:

---

If white southerners hated free blacks one would expect Jim Crow laws to be enacted immediately after the civil war instead of 20 years later when William Jennings Bryan was gaining power.

---

A bit difficult with an occupying army dictating all aspects of your governance and living for 12 of those years.

quote:

---

I read an article that claimed that Jim Crow laws were introduced at the tail end of the 1800’s because poor whites and the newly freed slaves were becoming too friendly and forming a populist political block that frightened the economic elite. Is this true?

---

I view that as an oversimplified claim. The better way to see this is that a whole region had been devastated by total war and then militarily occupied while the carpetbagger governance created an environment akin to Germany after WW1 - with a similar effect upon some of the populace. As the occupation was withdrawn a plurality of interests enacted some laws which we view in hindsight as unfortunate. The simple fact is that most political movements are driven by people with money and influence - which at that time was centered around the surviving white Democrats who managed to hold onto resources after the war. And they were looking after their own interests. But this did not preclude the poorer populace from being in support of many or all of those initiatives. After all, the measures passed - in spite of the fact that the rich white democrats held very few votes on their own.

Not justifying those laws, but you are asking what happened and the simple answer is just not accurate.

One major lesson is to work to resolve all of the causes of a conflict before moving on so that the conflicts do not recur. For example, the crushing terms of the armistice against Germany ending WW1 led to the aggressiveness of WW2 Germany. The rebuilding of post WW2 Germany led to a more stable Europe, as happened with Japan.
Hard war and soft peace is an inspired US military doctrine.