Started By
Message

re: Proposed Moon Mission Offers Little Value at Astronomical Cost

Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

You save money on fuel because there is only a fraction of Eartha gravity.


Not to mention we don't really have to contend with an atmosphere.
Posted by Esquire
Chiraq
Member since Apr 2014
15273 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:44 pm to
I would consider myself a staunch fiscal conservative, but I'm all for throwing billions into space exploration. This world needs another space race.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Ha. The distance from earth to Satarn is basically zero when considering interstellar travel. Building a base on the moon is like building a supply hut in your driveway when you plan on driving to Alaska.



This is just ridiculous ignorance.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31597 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Here's the thing, and this will always be true, no one gives a shite about space flight if it doesn't involve a human being.



Not true at all. Voyager captivated the nation as did Cassini. Hubble continues to do so every day. New Horizons did when it flew past Pluto, the Martian landers did beaming images of driving across another world. James Webb will do so when peering back to the beginning of time.

These all captured our interest but not only that did legitimate science without the resource burden of having to keep a human alive to do it.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
106119 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:45 pm to
Except for the huge America boner.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
40234 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:45 pm to
What do you think SpaceX does?

They are spending billions trying to make space exploration cheaper and more efficient
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61612 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:46 pm to
I just want us to get up there and then have the gov't laugh long and hard at all the idiots who think they own pieces of the moon as they strip mine the frick out of it and give them nothing.
Posted by Ole War Skule
North Shore
Member since Sep 2003
3409 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

What do you think SpaceX does?



They are going to make a return on their investment, unlike the government.
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
40234 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:47 pm to
quote:


I do. The cost to keep a moon base supplied isn't worth the return.

I'm guessing you've run the numbers yourself then.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Nonsense is right If the return on space exploration were so great, it would all have been done by private enterprise, not the government.


Private enterprise does this all the fricking time. Your entire life is revolving around this. You see that thing in your pocket that you likely replied to my post? Only possible thanks to the work of NASA. It's thanks to the miracle of NASA that we have the society that we currently live in. It's no coincidence that the kids who saw the moon landing went on to found the digital age.
This post was edited on 2/5/18 at 5:01 pm
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
40234 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:49 pm to
They partner with NASA. What kind of ROI are you expecting NASA to make. Do you realize their goal is science,right?
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31597 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

I would consider myself a staunch fiscal conservative, but I'm all for throwing billions into space exploration. This world needs another space race.



I'm all for it too, but do it smartly. If you are actually for exploring space then unmanned is the way to go.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
45427 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:50 pm to
Most legitimate experts believe space travel will not involve humans. The scale of space is too massive. You can send drone type technology to accomplish the same task at a fraction of the cost, and more efficient too.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
61612 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

They are going to make a return on their investment, unlike the government.


You clearly do not understand just how much we gained in scientific advancements due to the space program.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31597 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

You save money on fuel because there is only a fraction of Eartha gravity. Space flight is so expensive because you need huge rockets to propel heavy arse ships and equipment to space



You're right, but you'd be spending a trillion dollar investment for billions in savings. Not exactly a great ROI.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Voyager captivated the nation as did Cassini.


The Voyagers was a first though. No one knows what the Cassini is or did.

quote:

Hubble continues to do so every day.


The Hubble is exploring places where we are still centuries or millions of years away from exploring ourselves. False equivalency.

quote:

New Horizons did when it flew past Pluto, the Martian landers did beaming images of driving across another world.


I'm willing to bet most people wouldn't know New Horizons, nor remember any of the Mars probes names.

quote:

ames Webb will do so when peering back to the beginning of time.


That I can't wait for.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71735 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:53 pm to
Voyager and Cassini were made possible by the advances in technology and funding provided for the manned missions to the Moon. And as much as those probes “captivated the nation,” the manned missions of Apollo 8 and Apollo 11 captivated the entire world. The whole world literally stopped to watch live TV from those two missions. You don’t get that kind of reaction from robots.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:53 pm to
quote:

They are going to make a return on their investment, unlike the government.



Yeah, because the government didn't benefit in the long term by having to miniaturize massive computers that used to take up the size of a warehouse into a machine smaller than a deck of cards that's also a thousand times more powerful. No return on their investment whatsoever.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
45427 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:55 pm to
When the Webb finds a blue planet, and we send a drone to map it; the whole got dang world will be glued to the internet.
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31597 posts
Posted on 2/5/18 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

I'm willing to bet most people wouldn't know New Horizons, nor remember any of the Mars probes names.



I'd bet most couldn't name the space shuttles, doesn't know what the ISS is, know the names of a single astronaut, etc either.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram