Started By
Message
locked post

Possible legal trouble for sending texts to distracted drivers

Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:08 am
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46960 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:08 am
I guess in some cases they could prove u knew they were driving. Crazy

"The issue centers on a wrongful death civil lawsuit out of Lawrence County, where Court of Common Pleas Judge John Hodge allowed two men to be added as defendants. They were supposedly texting with a driver before she fatally struck a man on a motorcycle."

LINK
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 9:09 am
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
52640 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:10 am to
Wow

This takes the "It's everyone else's fault that I fricked up" mentality to a whole new level.
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 9:13 am
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
40271 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:10 am to
They aren't obligated to read or respond to the text. That's on the driver. What about the radio? Can we sue the radio station for playing nickel back and causing us to fiddle with the tuner?
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
83165 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:11 am to
That's pretty weird. I mean, I purposely don't text people when I know they're driving, but I'd hardly say it was my fault if they happened to be.

That said, I am so tired of looking around at a red light and seeing every single person around me texting.
Posted by Ash Williams
South of i-10
Member since May 2009
18563 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:12 am to
quote:

I am so tired of looking around at a red light


you should really be paying attention to the road

you're endangering the world
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46960 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:14 am to
I really don't understand why cops aren't cracking down on that. They could pay for their entire department in a day.
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
83165 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:18 am to
Yep. All you have to do is look at the cars turning left as they pass you, and half of them are texting mid-turn. I can't tell you how many times a week I miss traffic light cycles that I should have made because someone in front of the line didn't look up from their phone quickly enough.

I saw someone a couple days ago who was so into their phone that they missed an entire green light. When they finally looked up, it was yellow so they went, and the person behind them missed the whole thing.
Posted by SmoothOperator96
TD Premium Member
Member since Jan 2016
4151 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:19 am to
Because teens will get their parents to fight it, or an older woman will call it harassment. Because they never do any wrong. The cops are just out to get them because cops are bad
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 9:21 am
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104454 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:19 am to
quote:

I saw someone a couple days ago who was so into their phone that they missed an entire green light. When they finally looked up, it was yellow so they went, and the person behind them missed the whole thing.


That's what horns are for.
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43031 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:20 am to
Because it's a PITA, they don't know how to prove it, and the fines aren't enough for it to be worth their time. They do not care about texting and driving unless they are trying to pull over a suspicious vehicle or are trying to get someone for a DWI. Just line the seatbelt law, and just like the left lane law
Posted by SmoothOperator96
TD Premium Member
Member since Jan 2016
4151 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:21 am to
Yeah. I've never had this issue because I lay on my horn for a good bit. Just so they get the message.
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 9:46 am
Posted by Ash Williams
South of i-10
Member since May 2009
18563 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:22 am to
in reality this is ridiculous

thats like holding a bartender responsible for giving a guy the beer that puts him just over the legal limit

or holding mcdonalds responsible for giving a guy food at a drive through thats distracts him because he's eating while driving

or holding a female passenger responsible for giving you road head which distracts you while driving
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68469 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:26 am to

If I'm distracted by a hot in a miniskirt and cause an accident, she's liable as well?
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
83165 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:27 am to
quote:

That's what horns are for.



I think the person behind them was texting as well. That or they just didn't care..?

quote:

I lay on my horn for a good bit


I do as well. Even when someone is just driving horribly. If the person in front of me is swerving into the oncoming lane several times and it is obvious they're texting, I'll even lay on my horn for that Usually it wakes them up a bit. But shite, with so many people being hurt/killed over road rage, I'm afraid to even do that sometimes.
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 9:30 am
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70176 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:30 am to
quote:

half of them are texting mid-turn.


I never see this. Is this around campus or something?
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
83165 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 9:46 am to
I do not live anywhere near campus. Maybe you just don't look at people in their cars? I started creeping on them when Jones pointed out one day when he was my passenger that everyone around us was texting.
This post was edited on 5/10/16 at 9:50 am
Posted by rantfan
new iberia la
Member since Nov 2012
14110 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 10:09 am to
cops themselves are on phones and laptops while driving.
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Can we sue the radio station for playing nickel back and causing us to fiddle with the tuner?


Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69237 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 10:40 am to
That's a reach. Those "special circumstances" have to be tough to overcome as it relates to a plaintiff trying to add a 3rd party texter.
Posted by ruzil
WNC
Member since Feb 2012
18463 posts
Posted on 5/10/16 at 11:01 am to
Text messages were designed to discretely send a short message to someone with no anticipation of when it is supposed to be responded to.

It has become a way to hold a conversation with someone you don't really want to speak to.

This adding senders as defendants is nonsense.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram