Started By
Message

re: Pfizer’s CEO Hasn’t Gotten His Covid Vaccine Yet, Say He Doesn’t Want To Cut In Line!

Posted on 12/16/20 at 10:06 am to
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
60507 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 10:06 am to
quote:

Also have contact tracers we carry around.


They should just probably implant something in you.

But joking aside, I am 51, with HBP...I will take the vaccine but doubt I get any way to get it until later in the Spring. By then surely if there were any acute problems some of the weaker folks that are taking it would have experienced them.
This post was edited on 12/16/20 at 10:08 am
Posted by Areddishfish
The Wild West
Member since Oct 2015
6422 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 10:46 am to
quote:


because that’s the same as a first run vaccine


It's like people forget how those initial polio vaccines turned out.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107798 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 10:48 am to
quote:

It's like people forget how those initial polio vaccines turned out.


Its like people forgot it isnt 1955
Posted by HamzooReb
Utah
Member since Mar 2013
13607 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 2:34 pm to
quote:

the population exposed is no more than 12 or 15%, and likely much lower


This is where you're wrong. It's likely somewhere between 20% and 30% now.

LINK

This guy has been spot on with his modeling and as of 2 weeks ago he had it at almost 18%. After an explosion of cases so far in December it isn't hard to justify somewhere between 20% and 30%.
Posted by Muahahaha
Ohio
Member since Nov 2005
6731 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Pfizer’s CEO Hasn’t Gotten His Covid Vaccine Yet, Say He Doesn’t Want To Cut In Line!


Suuuuure!


This post was edited on 12/16/20 at 3:16 pm
Posted by BigPapiDoesItAgain
Amérique du Nord
Member since Nov 2009
3386 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

Friend,

If he were to get the vaccine, and break the protocol of who gets it first, there would be public outrage. We shall see how your post ages in 6 months after he does get it. It's very interesting and surprising to see the anti-vac movement on the OT and PT.

Yours,
TulaneLSU


I regret that I only have but one UPVOTE to give this post. You hit the nail on the head. I am in the Pfizer trial, and just got unblinded yesterday - though I was all but certain I got the real vaccine. Got first dose 20 Sep and second one 8 Oct. Vaccine acceptance has been huge at my institution over the last couple of days and I'm exceedingly optimistic about this not only stemming the COVID tide, but helping repair all of the collateral damage.
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
41875 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

you don’t read many medical journals do you


Nature Reviews is a legitimate scientific journal. What more do you want?
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

Nature Reviews is a legitimate scientific journal. What more do you want?


It’s a low tier review publication. I doubt they turn down many articles.

I read the whole article. It doesn’t say anything concerning. In fact it says mRNA vaccines are cheaper, safer, and easier to produce. And that was with 2018 technology.
This post was edited on 12/16/20 at 5:32 pm
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
40901 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

The antivacc sentiment on this board makes us look like backwoods yokels and dumb suburb Karens


It is truly odd. You'd think we'd all want to own China by not falling sick to their manufactured virus. Stand up to China and laugh at them. But nope
Posted by LordSaintly
Member since Dec 2005
41875 posts
Posted on 12/16/20 at 5:43 pm to
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 11Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram