- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pfizer CEO: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:34 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:34 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You're so brilliant. Yes, biden was presedent in March of 2020!
The OT, ladies and gents.
The vaccine wasn't available then.
0
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:36 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You're so brilliant. Yes, biden was presedent in March of 2020!
The OT, ladies and gents.
What vaccine did you get in March 2020?
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:36 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
and that some risks had to be taken
I'm fine with that. Science does what it does, government holds it back.
Its the misrepresentation by our government that I've had enough of.
Remember "the science is settled?" Science is never settled. The idiots claiming its "settled" are absolutely retards. Sure things change, but the reason I mistrust this entire fiasco is the lies, not the science.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:36 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:You took the covid 19 vaccine in March of 2020? Impressive
You're so brilliant. Yes, biden was presedent in March of 2020!
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:37 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
You guys are utterly obsessed with the '2-dose' narrative, as though nothing could change or that narrative could be informed by trying to get people vaccinated
What do you mean "narrative could be informed by trying to get people vaccinated"?
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:38 am to stout
Oh ok, so I just need to keep getting boosted into perpetuity to protect myself from the sniffles
Start licking handrails people.
Start licking handrails people.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:39 am to lsupride87
quote:
You took the covid 19 vaccine in March of 2020? Impressive
Sorry, first week of Jan was the first. Second was in March.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:40 am to Vacherie Saint
There is nothing legitimate that shows the vaccinnated are more at risk of death and hospitalization. Anybody that says otherwise are Q level nut jobs. And I’ve been loudly anti-mandates for jabs and mask since day one. They are Orwellian and against American values. However confirmation bias is at an all time high and needs to be called out no matter what side it comes from.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 9:41 am
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:40 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Sorry, first week of Jan was the first. Second was in March.
2021…….
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:40 am to MikeBRLA
Pfizer CEO March 2021: “Two doses of the vaccine offers 95% lasting protection and is robust against variants!"
Pfizer CEO August 2021: "Two doses will keep you out of the hospital or from dying!"
Pfizer CEO in December 2021: "Two doses of the vaccine will give protection similar to a seasonal flu shot!"
Pfizer CEO in January 2022: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any"
Pfizer CEO August 2021: "Two doses will keep you out of the hospital or from dying!"
Pfizer CEO in December 2021: "Two doses of the vaccine will give protection similar to a seasonal flu shot!"
Pfizer CEO in January 2022: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any"
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 9:58 am
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:40 am to beerJeep
Yeah..not 2020.
I scheduled my first one in Dec 2020, got the shot in Jan, follow up first week of march. I got my second in March 2021.
My health took a sharp turn, doc said to hold off on boosters until after I see how cancer meds are doing.
Not doing boosters, not worried in the least about the latest variant.
I scheduled my first one in Dec 2020, got the shot in Jan, follow up first week of march. I got my second in March 2021.
My health took a sharp turn, doc said to hold off on boosters until after I see how cancer meds are doing.
Not doing boosters, not worried in the least about the latest variant.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 9:44 am
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:41 am to moneyg
quote:
What do you mean "narrative could be informed by trying to get people vaccinated"?
As in, choosing a 2-dose strategy, including the interval, was based on the desire for vaccination rather than evidence that plasma cell response was fully primed.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:41 am to RogerTheShrubber
Huh. Who was president in March 2021?
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:42 am to OGtigerfan87
quote:
There is nothing legitimate that shows the vaccinnated are more at risk of death and hospitalization.
A healthy 90 year old that is triple vaccinated is more at risk for death and hospitalization than an unvaccinated, heathy, 20 year old.
You owe me $5
Outlandish age difference aside..
You can take a couple 21 year old males. One is super healthy, active, etc but is unvaccinated. The other is a lazy 300 pound lardass that is triple vaccinated.
The triple vaccinated lardass 21 year old is still at a higher risk level than the super healthy unvaccinated 21 year old.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 10:30 am
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:53 am to lsupride87
quote:
If it’s “with covid” it’s more impressive for the vaccine. That means it’s preventing severe illness for everything
What's impressive is your ability to avoid the "selective testing" part.
But, hey, dishonesty is ok if it furthers your argument and supports your opinion, right?
Sampling is everything when it comes to statistics. It's very easy to manipulate things if you have your thumb on the scale. And, if you test "some people" instead of "all people" when they show up at the hospital, it's not meaningful. And, when you test "some people" based on their vaccination status, it actually skews the data in a direct manner to what you are trying to use the data for.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:55 am to moneyg
quote:And where have you and others gathered this information?
And, if you test "some people" instead of "all people" when they show up at the hospital, it's not meaningful.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:55 am to OGtigerfan87
You arent paying attention. There are some studies out of Denmark and Germany that draw links to the vaccine and long term degradation of the immune system that makes the vaccinated 8X more likely to contract Omicron.
LINK
There was also the recent report that excess deaths are up 40%, many of those deaths are not covid related. This is drawing attention to to the response and how it has impacted non-covid related deaths.
LINK
We already know that the vaccine itself is the most deadly ever recorded by the VAERS metric, with over 20,000 deaths and over 36,000 permanently disabled.
LINK
There's a reason the FDA's traditional process is so rigorous and time consuming. Did we honestly think we could pull this off in just a few months without a hell of a lot of eggs being broken?
Again, there are questions that need to be asked and answered here, but if you want to call everyone who asks questions a "Q-Tard", help yourself. Its a free country for now.
LINK
There was also the recent report that excess deaths are up 40%, many of those deaths are not covid related. This is drawing attention to to the response and how it has impacted non-covid related deaths.
LINK
We already know that the vaccine itself is the most deadly ever recorded by the VAERS metric, with over 20,000 deaths and over 36,000 permanently disabled.
LINK
There's a reason the FDA's traditional process is so rigorous and time consuming. Did we honestly think we could pull this off in just a few months without a hell of a lot of eggs being broken?
Again, there are questions that need to be asked and answered here, but if you want to call everyone who asks questions a "Q-Tard", help yourself. Its a free country for now.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:55 am to crazy4lsu
quote:
It really isn't
yikes
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:55 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:Tell us what testing steps were skipped
There's a reason the FDA's traditional process is so rigorous and time consuming. Did we honestly think we could pull this off in just a few months without a hell of a lot of eggs being broken?
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 9:56 am
Posted on 1/11/22 at 9:57 am to moneyg
quote:
yikes
Define this 'with Covid'/'from Covid' distinction for me in clinical terms. Because it seems to be based on a very limited notion of this virus in particular.
Page 7 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News