- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pfizer CEO: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any
Posted on 1/11/22 at 12:57 pm to stout
Posted on 1/11/22 at 12:57 pm to stout
So I’m reading the covidian arguments in this thread.
Have yet to see them address “the science” of a very targeted and unique chemical formula (the vaccine) being used to kill off a very unique virus via a very specific dosage.
But this vaccine doesn’t work against this new variant (understandable) UNLESS you take a higher dose of the vaccine (not understandable).

This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:05 pm to stout
Swedish study you can lookup right now says the vaccine doesnt work after 6 months.
MRNA requires perpetual boosters.
And a more recent study in breakthrough infections, demonstrating no difference between viral counts in either vaccinated or unvaccinated individuals.
Garbage """vaccines""" but good if you're trying to make money.
MRNA requires perpetual boosters.
And a more recent study in breakthrough infections, demonstrating no difference between viral counts in either vaccinated or unvaccinated individuals.
Garbage """vaccines""" but good if you're trying to make money.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:05 pm to moneyg
quote:
Wow. Multiple deaths of young women in good health due to Omicron. That's news I hadn't heard.
The youngest was 35ish. But the coagulopathy aspect of COVID hasn't really been discussed at all.
quote:
So, you are taking the stance that you can't tell the difference between someone who dies due to COVID vs. someone who dies with COVID.
No, I'm saying that delineation is not clear clinically because COVID is a systemic infection. Obviously there were cases like car accidents being labeled as COVID deaths, but in actual practice, it would be insanely difficult to make that distinction in clinically meaningful terms. I mean, I don't even know what it means in actual practice. And again, we don't do that with any other cause of death.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:07 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
None are mandated
Has nothing to do with efficacy. A total non sequitur.
I'll ask you this: were covid vaccines proven to reduce transmission of Alpha, Delta, Mu variants?
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:09 pm to OU812ME2
quote:
They were too busy playing politics and getting that sweet govt cheese to worry about actually trying to take care of the symptoms.
You think MDs and RNs got the govt cheese?
Your lack of understanding of the machine that is healthcare is astounding. Blame your politicians and govt entities. Not the ones stuck dealing with the fallout.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:25 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
With what? Educating people who barely have any grasp of the history of infectious disease
Yep, good luck having them take a second to think about it rationally as opposed to the lens of "how does this appear to affect my narrative".
ETA: Look at Rogers response.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:25 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
What's the difference between the first two doses and the booster?
Absolutely nothing. Just like there are zero plans to roll out revised vaccines for the new variants. Getting approvals costs money.
Cuts into profit margin when we can just push more of the same.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:27 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Again, people who barely understand pathology making this 'with-Covid/'from-Covid' distinction don't seem to understand that systemic infection causes systemic sequalae. We don't partition pathophysiologies like this for any other cause. Why is this distinction meaningful for COVID alone?
It matters because we are testing so many asymptomatic people who are sick with something else altogether, and the Covid they are carrying isn't actually doing anything to them. I guess I think of it like chickenpox or HPV. These viruses can technically be in your body for years and cause zero "symptoms" of illness.
So, if a person is admitted to the hospital while having a cardiac episode and happens to test positive for Covid because of routine screening, I would think this absolutely matters.
I think the number of asymptomatic people carrying Covid is vastly underestimated, which would make this a much less problematic illness.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:29 pm to HouseMom
JEWISH PU SSY GOT ME ACTIN' UNWISE
edit: my bad, wrong thread
edit: my bad, wrong thread
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 1:30 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:30 pm to Volvagia
quote:
Absolutely nothing. Just like there are zero plans to roll out revised vaccines for the new variants. Getting approvals costs money.
Cuts into profit margin when we can just push more of the same.
The whole vaccine patent thing really undermines the seriousness of infection. The one advantage of the mRNA program was the sensitivity with which you could design boosters, which appears also to be a non-starter for these companies.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:31 pm to mdomingue
quote:
Yep, good luck having them take a second to think about it rationally
Rational thinkers don't accept shitty politicians orders without questioning.
I'm vaccinated, and was sold a bill that isn't factual.
Irrationality would be ignoring that.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:32 pm to HouseMom
quote:
I think the number of asymptomatic people carrying Covid is vastly underestimated
Easily.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
I'm vaccinated, and was sold a bill that isn't factual.
Same situation here. Just trying to approach this situation logically and being "guided" by the most emotional people on the planet. It's frustrating.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:38 pm to HouseMom
quote:
So, if a person is admitted to the hospital while having a cardiac episode and happens to test positive for Covid because of routine screening, I would think this absolutely matters.
Yeah it absolutely matters. Think about why.
quote:
I think the number of asymptomatic people carrying Covid is vastly underestimated, which would make this a much less problematic illness.
I don't think it is underestimated. I think people want it to be underestimated, but I've seen no evidence for that.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:38 pm to HouseMom
quote:
Same situation here. Just trying to approach this situation logically and being "guided" by the most emotional people on the planet. It's frustrating.
That's what happens when "public safety" becomes the emotional appeal. The desire for corruption to foster is too great.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:39 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
I think people want it to be underestimated, but I've seen no evidence for that.
That's generally the case when things are underestimated and not treated.
People with no symptoms have no reason to be tested.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:41 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
That's generally the case when things are underestimated and not treated.
People with no symptoms have no reason to be tested.
If only there were some other way of confirming a previous infection.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:50 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:Why would people who are asymptomatic be tested?
If only there were some other way of confirming a previous infection.
This is that common sense thing so many people don't have.
This post was edited on 1/11/22 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:54 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Why would people who are asymptomatic be tested?
This is that common sense thing so many people don't have.
You appear to not understand to what I'm referring to, again, which appears to be a pattern.
Posted on 1/11/22 at 1:54 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
If only there were some other way of confirming a previous infection.
Yes, but people who aren't being tested in the first place surely aren't also going to randomly get tested for antibodies.
Is there a good study where someone is tracking this?
Popular
Back to top


0





