- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Parasites and Cancer
Posted on 1/15/25 at 9:46 am to DocOnc
Posted on 1/15/25 at 9:46 am to DocOnc
Of course.
His links and information are crap.
And the folks in this thread drawing parallels between well-established medications and protocols for cancer treatments, which has decades of solid peer-reviewed research, and Covid treatments, a brand-new disease, are especially stupid.
If you hate "big pharma" and your tinfoil hats glow red when you hear the words, fine.
But check out the tremendous new medications, that actually are working, that increase long-term survival rates for cancer patients.
They came from somewhere, and not off the shelf at Tractor Supply.
His links and information are crap.
And the folks in this thread drawing parallels between well-established medications and protocols for cancer treatments, which has decades of solid peer-reviewed research, and Covid treatments, a brand-new disease, are especially stupid.
If you hate "big pharma" and your tinfoil hats glow red when you hear the words, fine.
But check out the tremendous new medications, that actually are working, that increase long-term survival rates for cancer patients.
They came from somewhere, and not off the shelf at Tractor Supply.
2
Posted on 1/15/25 at 9:51 am to N2cars
Most people don’t seem to understand the tremendous strides that have been made in cancer treatments in the past couple of decades. People also have no idea the complexities of treating and curing the many different types of cancers.
Posted on 1/15/25 at 9:52 am to N2cars
quote:
that increase long-term survival rates for cancer patients.
If you keep taking the medication. Those medications aren't free. More money in the pockets of pharmaceutical companies.
Wouldn't you want your cancer to be cured instead?
Posted on 1/15/25 at 9:55 am to OldmanBeasley
Absolutely.
And people think anecdotal evidence is fact...
"Mawmaw smoked PallMalls for 63 years and she never got no cancers..."
Well clearly, Pall Malls prevent cancer!!!
And people think anecdotal evidence is fact...
"Mawmaw smoked PallMalls for 63 years and she never got no cancers..."
Well clearly, Pall Malls prevent cancer!!!
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:42 pm to Rip Torn
Well you can certainly live without a pancreas so there us that…
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:54 pm to OldmanBeasley
quote:
People also have no idea the complexities of treating and curing the many different types of cancers.
This. I feel like we've kind of lost the plot in some ways. A lot of people think a cancer is entirely defined by where it is. The first big hurdle in cancer treatment is accurate identification of the type. There are similarities between cancers, but it's far from some monolithic disease. Frankly, seeking a "cure for cancer" is slightly less onerous than seeking a "cure for virus." You cure one, and another will likely appear. .
Posted on 1/16/25 at 8:59 pm to La Place Mike
quote:
If you keep taking the medication. Those medications aren't free. More money in the pockets of pharmaceutical companies.
Wouldn't you want your cancer to be cured instead?
Your theory has to involve a near entirety of the medical community ignoring their Hippocratic Oath to ensure that all patients are treated through the Big Pharma regimens. That's simply not crossing Occam's Razor unscathed.
Look, I despise big pharma, but if Ivermectin was some miracle cure for cancer, that would be too big to cover up.
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 9:02 pm
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:05 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
This thread was good at outing the weak-minded.
"Don't you want to cure yours is cancer?"
"Don't you want to cure yours is cancer?"
This post was edited on 1/16/25 at 9:07 pm
Posted on 1/16/25 at 9:10 pm to CCT
quote:
Lung cancer survivor of 3 years, here. It’s fricking terrifying to get a cancer diagnosis. I had been reading about fenben and ivermectin treatments for Covid and cancer before my diagnosis. My oncologist straight up lied to me and told me that he had never heard of either medicines being used for cancer, and a veterinarian family member told me that they’ve known about the fenben for a while.
The oncology nurse admitted to me a month or so later that yes, they had heard of it but knew nothing about how to do the protocols. I told them if the cancer goes away and comes back I will be doing the other stuff either concurrently with new treatment or by itself.
I’m confused how you went from the first statement to the second paragraph.
So you get diagnosed with lung cancer. Get treated with traditional therapeutics. Survive.
Now youre angry because your doctor didn’t go with some rogue treatment that may or may not work but it’s cheap?
This post was edited on 1/17/25 at 6:11 am
Posted on 1/16/25 at 10:40 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
quote:
Your theory has to involve a near entirety of the medical community ignoring their Hippocratic Oath to ensure that all patients are treated through the Big Pharma regimens.
Do you remember way back when pretty much the entire medical community fell into lock step with big pharma and the Government demanding everyone must get the jab, wear mask, and sociallly distance? Do remember when some of the medical community spoke out they were ostracized? So yeah. It's not hard to imagine the entire medical community ignoring their Hippocratic Oath.
Posted on 1/16/25 at 11:02 pm to kaleidoscoping
So what’s the cure for cancer?
Posted on 1/17/25 at 1:44 am to Adam Banks
No, not at all angry any more. I didn’t like the way he dissed the subject, feigned ignorance of it instead of just being honest. The nurse was honest later. I wasn’t asking him to give me that instead and I would not have asked him to give it to me because I was aware it was controversial. I wanted his opinion on what he had heard.
I am also an old guy who remembers that when cancer comes back (and it usually does) it is usually more stubborn. Maybe I’m wrong.
I will do what the doctor wants but I am also a little more knowledgeable and will supplement with the ivermectin/fenben treatment.
I am also an old guy who remembers that when cancer comes back (and it usually does) it is usually more stubborn. Maybe I’m wrong.
I will do what the doctor wants but I am also a little more knowledgeable and will supplement with the ivermectin/fenben treatment.
Posted on 1/17/25 at 8:01 am to Lsutigerturner
If you get cancer today, generally speaking, you have a outstanding chance of survival. In a lot of cases, survival rates surpass 80-90%.
That's using current, proven medicines that have been properly vetted, trialed, and have a track record of success.
Why people wouldn't follow the advice of their oncologist, who deals with this every day, is beyond any common sense and logic.
And as for medicines costing a lot, there are multiple programs to provide them. Show me anyone who isn't receiving meds for lack of funds...
That's using current, proven medicines that have been properly vetted, trialed, and have a track record of success.
Why people wouldn't follow the advice of their oncologist, who deals with this every day, is beyond any common sense and logic.
And as for medicines costing a lot, there are multiple programs to provide them. Show me anyone who isn't receiving meds for lack of funds...
Posted on 1/17/25 at 8:25 am to winkchance
It is amazing that this ivermectin CoVID bullshite is still persisting. It is not a cure. At best, it speeds up recovery because it is antibacterial and helps limit pneumonia and other infections. It is not an antiviral.
As for cancer, it has been studied as part of cancer treatments for 30 years. Nothing new here.
As for cancer, it has been studied as part of cancer treatments for 30 years. Nothing new here.
Posted on 1/17/25 at 10:00 am to BugAC
quote:
Or... the FDA has no interest in testing Ivermectin/Fenbendazole/etc... and people (doctors) are risk averse. They are living a comfortable life not upsetting the apple cart and they simply are doing what big medicine tells them.
Bro, I want you to pay close attention because this is important. Click on your second link. Now read the last sentence of the article…
quote:
Riggins has a financial interest in Benizole Therapeutics, PBC
So the scientist that owns some mebendazole company found evidence that it helps cancer…. You don’t say!
And you are over here chirping about big pharma. Are you sure this guy is the one you want to trust?
Page 8 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News