Started By
Message

re: OTD in 1865, Gen. Lee gave his sword to Gen. Grant

Posted on 4/9/18 at 8:50 pm to
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36636 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 8:50 pm to
quote:


I don't believe Grant ever beat Jackson, the real military genius of that war.




Grant never had to.


The "genius" got shot by his own men.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36636 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

But I’m not going to be so damn quick to say that ALL slave owners treated their slaves like shite. Lee didn’t



Well this is just bullshite.



Lee treated his father-in-law's slaves horrendously.

He was notorious for mistreatment among his slaves.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

Because blacks were seen as a commodity, for lack of a better term, to plantation owners. Absolutely fricking them up would’ve hurt their bottom line.


yep, a good read on that is about the great Mississippi River flood after the war, something...tide rising, idr... landowners/business owners were doing what they could to entice them to stay, still racism, but a lot of opportunity for them started there
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 8:57 pm to
Well, if Ewell had done what Lee said and taken Cemetery Hill on the first day, Pickett might not have had to make that charge. Don’t give me the “if practical” nonsense, Lee was a gentleman and treated his subordinates as such. If anything, that is Lee’s biggest mistake, being too nice to his subordinates.
Posted by browl
North of BR
Member since Nov 2017
1571 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 8:58 pm to
So when does the day come when people learn that the civil war was instigated by an external entity and not really about slavery at all?

ETA...all you "baws" obviously don't know WTF I'm talking about. What a shame.
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 2:31 pm
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36636 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

Lee was a gentleman and treated his subordinates as such. If anything, that is Lee’s biggest mistake, being too nice to his subordinates.



So did Grant.


What's your point?


quote:

Well, if Ewell had done what Lee said and taken Cemetery Hill on the first day, Pickett might not have had to make that charge.



And if they'd have broken Chamberlain's line, he might not have had to make the charge.


It's funny, all the West Point, military geniuses the South had got stopped by a school teacher from small town Maine with no military training.

That's what is called "being a natural".
This post was edited on 4/9/18 at 9:02 pm
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 8:59 pm to
quote:

So did Grant.

so he was a friendly drunk
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

Well this is just bullshite. Lee treated his father-in-law's slaves horrendously. He was notorious for mistreatment among his slaves.


Where in the frick have you read this? Because the only time I’ve ever heard of his horrendous treatment was him whipping some slaves for escaping.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:05 pm to
I guess you don’t understand that the force in defense has the upper hand? Especially when attacking uphill. An entrenched enemy has the upper hand.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36636 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

guess you don’t understand that the force in defense has the upper hand? Especially when attacking uphill. An entrenched enemy has the upper hand.




You don't know why Chamberlain won the day, do you?


Staying entrenched would have led to his defeat.

This post was edited on 4/9/18 at 9:34 pm
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
51733 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:06 pm to
Eh calling the North outright good guys is a tad disengenous although the South isn't the innocent side this board would like you to believe
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
49696 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:10 pm to
quote:

And tear down Grant's tomb in Manhattan.


Who’s buried in it?
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

And tear down Grant's tomb in Manhattan.

repeat of what I posted earlier but deleted because I didn't want to get into this, but look at the origin of Arlington Cemetery, pretty low life if you ask me
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
118271 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:16 pm to
Didn’t read this whole thread, but did anybody notice it looked like Lee never skipped one frickin leg day?



Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
93541 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

it looked like Lee never skipped one frickin leg day?




boots hid the calves
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:17 pm to
Yeah, when they finally ran out of ammunition, they charged downhill with the bayonet.
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36636 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:28 pm to
quote:

Yeah, when they finally ran out of ammunition, they charged downhill with the bayonet.




That is what happened.


Now why did it work?
Posted by TxTiger82
Member since Sep 2004
34329 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

I don't believe Grant ever beat Jackson, the real military genius of that war.



I think you have to be both a great tactician AND a great strategist to be considered a military genius (ala Napoleon or Alexander the Great).

Jackson was certainly a talented battlefield tactician. But he was never in a position to define strategy. The ANV's strategy was 100% Robert E. Lee.

Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:46 pm to
quote:

Lee looks like a loser.



Lee is the only person in the history of the country who could have made a war 2 years shorter if he had picked the other side.

real loser there
Posted by magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
36636 posts
Posted on 4/9/18 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

Lee is the only person in the history of the country who could have made a war 2 years shorter if he had picked the other side. 



You think we'd have won independence if Washington chose the British?

You think they'd have kept fighting through that first winter without Washington?
This post was edited on 4/9/18 at 9:50 pm
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram