Started By
Message

OT Watch people: Bought my first watch

Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:07 am
Posted by MLSter
Member since Feb 2013
3967 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:07 am
I was buying myself Christmas presents on amazon and looking at watches, asked a few people for recs and they said DW. when I searched amazon had a St. Mawes on sale for $86 regular $229 and it said 1 left in stock so I rushed and bought it.



did I do a good job? its rose gold and 40mm, the more I look at it the more I want the silver, which I also saw for around $90

I was looking at a fossil and the person I asked said don't get a fossil. Are they bad now or something?
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59582 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:09 am to
Nothing is classier than a white face with gold hands. IWWI
Posted by reggie gajan
Member since Aug 2006
891 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:14 am to
It's considered a fashion watch in the watch community but it's simplicity makes it a great looking watch. Probably overpriced for a simple quartz but wear what makes you happy. I think it looks great.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22156 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:15 am to
I like it
Posted by Covingtiger
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Mar 2010
3313 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:16 am to
quote:

regular $229
Sorry, but it's just a standard Quartz fashion watch. But if you like how it looks and it stood out to you, wear it. It does look nice.
Posted by reggie gajan
Member since Aug 2006
891 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:19 am to
Also, you can get the same exact quartz watch on alliexpress with or without the logo for like 10 bucks. Huge markup on fashion watches.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18253 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:21 am to
I like it. Good buy.
Posted by MLSter
Member since Feb 2013
3967 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:24 am to
when I saw $86 I was thinking that was a lot then I saw regular $229. idk why anyone would pay that much for such a simple watch, even if for the name ive never heard of DW

I mean I like it enough but having a little buyers remorse and think I should I have just waited and looked more> instead of rushing into the purchase because the savings
Posted by GaryMyMan
Shreveport
Member since May 2007
13498 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:24 am to
For $90 in that style I don't think you can beat that. I know a ballin' lawyer who wears that one.

Now get a Seiko SKX007 for the weekend.

Posted by MLSter
Member since Feb 2013
3967 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Seiko SKX007

gross
just looked it up and no way im paying that much for such an ugly watch.

I am in the market for a less dressy, more casual/active watch but no need to spend more than $30 on something like that
Posted by Jack Daniel
In the bottle
Member since Feb 2013
25406 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:29 am to
quote:

the watch community


That is some funny shite.
Posted by Scooba
Member since Jun 2013
19999 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:29 am to
The D is backwards, should have been heavily discounted for that kind of flaw.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83514 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:30 am to
quote:

I am in the market for a less dressy, more casual/active watch but no need to spend more than $30 on something like that


Timex field watch

you can change the bands to whatever you want

$30 at Target

Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:31 am to
Ehhh...

Get a Hamilton...

Or Shinola

That DW looks like a proctologists watch, a dude that sticks his hand up asses all day.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:33 am to
I don't wear a watch often but when I do it's a vintage. I have a wittnauer that I'm partial to.
Posted by Covingtiger
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Mar 2010
3313 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Seiko SKX007

quote:

no way im paying that much for such an ugly watch


Woah man. That watch is a legend
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
17473 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:33 am to
Yeh the "D" is backwards on the face, so don't get overly excited.

But congrats on telling time without your phone!
Posted by Grim
Member since Dec 2013
12302 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:34 am to
Inb4 LucasP makes the same tired troll about watches being jewelry for men
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 8:10 am
Posted by IceTiger
Really hot place
Member since Oct 2007
26584 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Timex field watch



Posted by blkhawktiger
Glad All Over
Member since Nov 2011
2014 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:36 am to
It's a $10-15 quartz watch Daniel Wellington slapped their logo on and sold it to you "on sale" for almost a $100.

You may like it and that may be all that matters to you. But either way, you've started a thread over a $10-15 watch. Congrats.
This post was edited on 12/7/16 at 7:37 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram