Started By
Message

re: OT hypothetical: let’s say you wanted to conquer the ancient world

Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:00 pm to
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43534 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:00 pm to
500k Spartans
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
114938 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:00 pm to
Half a million Berserkers.
Posted by 50_Tiger
Arlington TX
Member since Jan 2016
43534 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Spartans has no distance weapons, no cavalry, and would get absolutely slaughtered in a large, open battleground


Then we will fight in the shade!
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
20381 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Mongols, Ghengis’ mongols to be exact


This would be my pick also. They took warfare to another level and were the first to use what Hitler used in WWII in the Blitzkreig----only they did it with horses and bows.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42752 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:02 pm to
500,000 romans employing the maniple structure and organization damn near conquered the know world. If it was actually romans and not conscripts they could give most people more than they could handle, but I just believe 500,000 mongol horse archers would be incredibly tough to beat.

As to hardcore histories, have you listened to the newest one yet? It’s pretty awesome so far
This post was edited on 7/19/18 at 12:25 pm
Posted by HeadChange
Abort gay babies
Member since May 2009
43925 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:02 pm to
I’m about 50 mins in
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
11582 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:06 pm to
I really like the Romans. They had organization, knew total warfare, and had a fierce loyalty in addition to having a civilization back home to fund the fighting long-term.

It would be something, though, to see 500,000 Viking berserkers going nuts. They also had a knack for oceanfaring, even if their longboats didn't constitute an armada.

Otherwise, you can't go wrong with 500K Spartans as someone said (or Greeks in general, because they also had a working navy with Athens) or Genghis Khan's Mongolians.


Edit: it really just depends on the terrain. If it's a little of everything (open ground, mountains, desert, snow, ocean, marsh), you really just need the most flexible army, and one with a navy.
This post was edited on 7/19/18 at 12:09 pm
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

As to hardcore histories, have you listened to the newest one yet? It’s pretty awesome so far


I’m gonna give it another listen. I kept having to pause it. Couldn’t get a real great flow doing that.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Half a million Berserkers.


Hundreds of thousands of Berserkers were slaughtered by the Romans because the Roman strategy was about 100 years ahead of the Berserkers.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
21077 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Kind of a detour, but I’ve always wondered how a modern special forces unit would stand up to say, the entire British army in the American Revolution


How large is the unit?

Estimated 50k British soldiers in the American Revolution. No doubt the special forces unit could take out a ton but I assume the British would form a few traps or some sort of strategy to take out a smaller force with modern day weapons. Unless the special forces are using long range artillery.

Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
70130 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:17 pm to
I’ll say mongols or Persians

Spartans were fierce, many of them were pedophiles. Come to think of it the ancient world had an insane amount of pedophiles
Posted by kook
Berrytown
Member since Sep 2013
2155 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

500,000 romans employing the mandible structure

maniple
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42752 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:25 pm to
Damn autocorrect and fat fingers do not mix on an iPhone and trying to type and unusual word. Thanks for the correction
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

No doubt the special forces unit could take out a ton but I assume the British would form a few traps or some sort of strategy to take out a smaller force with modern day weapons. Unless the special forces are using long range artillery.


Yeah I don’t think the special forces guys would do as good as people think in that scenario. 10 special forces guys vs. 100 redcoats though, give me the special forces guys.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:33 pm to
Also, 500K Israelites with King David leading them and God on their side??? Good luck to anybody trying to stop that force.
Posted by eScott
Member since Oct 2008
11376 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Who ya got?


Nebuchadnezzar
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:41 pm to
As hard as it was to not call the Mongols, I think I would have to go with the Romans. Their record of longevity beats the Mongols. Their internal political structure was better than the Mongols'.
Posted by Vastmind
B Ara
Member since Sep 2013
5322 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:48 pm to
Spartans
Posted by kook
Berrytown
Member since Sep 2013
2155 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:50 pm to
that ok. I just learned that cause I Googled Mandible Structure.
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 7/19/18 at 12:51 pm to
Mongolians
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram