- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ohio lawmakers have proposed a new law that bans men from ejaculating without intent
Posted on 2/13/25 at 8:46 pm to WildcatMike
Posted on 2/13/25 at 8:46 pm to WildcatMike
quote:
The lawmakers say the point of ”The Conception Begins at Erection Act" is to "call out the hypocrisy" of "bills that regulate women’s bodies."
Crazy nazifeminists and alphabets. Alphabet sex is an exception, and lesbians can still get sperm donations to have a kid. It’s a joke of a bill that know will go nowhere, but they still had to bend the knee to alphabets. Surprised they didn’t also give black males an exception, but at least they define men and women by their sex and are also admitting heterosexuality is the norm and the natural sexuality in both creation and in evolution.
If they want to stop with their hypocrisy they should push to legally make the mother fully and solely responsible financially for their babies since they believe only the woman has the power and the “magic” to decide if a lump of tissue (their term) becomes a human baby at birth. If they believe it’s 100% solely on the woman to turn that tissue into a life at birth than they should also believe that women should bear the full responsibility of providing for that baby.
I don’t agree with fathers not being held responsible to care for their kids with the mother, but I also don’t agree with them that the life of a baby starts when the woman decides it does.
This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 8:51 pm
1
Posted on 2/13/25 at 8:47 pm to WildcatMike
quote:
There are some exceptions, such as when protection or contraceptions are used during sex. It also wouldn’t apply when an individual is masturbating, donating sperm, or if the intercourse takes place between members of the LGBTQ+ community and thus doesn’t “produce ova.” So what this would apply to is sex without a condom and without actually wanting to procreate. This felony would cost violators thousands of dollars, with a max of $10,000 per discharge.
It’s supposed to criminalize a guy not wearing a condom and ejaculating in a woman when they aren’t trying to procreate. I’m not saying I agree with this bill, but it sounds way different than OP is presenting.
LINK
This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 2/13/25 at 8:47 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Keep in mind this is only a day after a Democrat congresswoman suggested women don’t go into manufacturing because the word “manufacturing” starts with “man.”
Did she explain why women manipulate or why they get manicures???
This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 8:53 pm
Posted on 2/13/25 at 8:55 pm to WildcatMike
This is the weirdest thing I've ever read! So unless you're having gay sex, masturbating, or donating sperm, if you ejaculate having sex with a woman who's either on the pill or you wearing a condom, you get fined $10,000? What kind of dumb shite is this? They're trying to criminalize heterosexual sex?
I think they failed at trying to point out the hypocrisy!
I think they failed at trying to point out the hypocrisy!
This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 2/13/25 at 8:56 pm to WildcatMike
quote:
call out the hypocrisy" of "bills that regulate women’s bodies."
In which state is it legal for fathers to kill their children?
Posted on 2/13/25 at 8:57 pm to WildcatMike
And some wonder why so many don't vote.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 9:25 pm to Trauma14
quote:
if you ejaculate having sex with a woman who's either on the pill or you wearing a condom, you get fined $10,000
No, that’s protected too. Wouldn’t be a crime.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 9:50 pm to WildcatMike
What happened to ‘my body my choice’?
What the frick has happened to this country??
What the frick has happened to this country??
Posted on 2/13/25 at 10:13 pm to WildcatMike
Sounds like something fat ugly bitches who haven't seen a dick since the Obama administration would propose.
Posted on 2/13/25 at 10:19 pm to VOLhalla
quote:
No, that’s protected too. Wouldn’t be a crime.
Oh, yeah. Understood. Unprotected sex is a crime. So it's a Catholic law!
Posted on 2/13/25 at 10:26 pm to dallastigers
quote:It’s probably just a troll to get a rise out of people. At least that didn't work...
Crazy nazifeminists and alphabets. Alphabet sex is an exception, and lesbians can still get sperm donations to have a kid. It’s a joke of a bill that know will go nowhere, but they still had to bend the knee to alphabets. Surprised they didn’t also give black males an exception, but at least they define men and women by their sex and are also admitting heterosexuality is the norm and the natural sexuality in both creation and in evolution.
If they want to stop with their hypocrisy they should push to legally make the mother fully and solely responsible financially for their babies since they believe only the woman has the power and the “magic” to decide if a lump of tissue (their term) becomes a human baby at birth. If they believe it’s 100% solely on the woman to turn that tissue into a life at birth than they should also believe that women should bear the full responsibility of providing for that baby.
I don’t agree with fathers not being held responsible to care for their kids with the mother, but I also don’t agree with them that the life of a baby starts when the woman decides it does.
What kind of pathetic elected official would make over-the-top, unserious troll proposals just to piss off their too-dumb-to-realize-it rivals and pander to their base, anyway?
This post was edited on 2/13/25 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 2/14/25 at 1:21 am to WildcatMike
quote:
bans men from ejaculating without intent
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:21 am to WildcatMike
frickin politicians are so fricked up, now go enforce it dumb asses
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:27 am to WildcatMike
quote:
Exceptions under the law include people ejaculating in the LGBTQ community, sperm donation, and masturbat*on.
Fanbase fig numbers confirmed.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 7:34 am to WildcatMike
quote:
The bill was brought forward by Democratic State reps Anita Somani and Tristan Rade.
The same people that wanted women to withhold sex... Dems are legit retarded.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 7:41 am to WildcatMike
Oh I have intent
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:39 am to WildcatMike
Just another example of the fact that Democrats have absolutely no idea why they got beat so badly in 2024. The party is completely lost and needs a hard reset.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:48 am to WildcatMike
inmate-what are you in for?
me-popping of a few shots
inmate-did you kill anyone
me-millions
me-popping of a few shots
inmate-did you kill anyone
me-millions
Posted on 2/14/25 at 8:49 am to Fat and Happy
quote:
All men gangbangs we’re just not gonna have the same excitement with that sort of thing lingering
Why proofreading and punctuation is important, folks.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News