Started By
Message

re: Nuking Japan in WWII saved nearly 500,000 GI's...FACT

Posted on 6/29/16 at 3:14 am to
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11742 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 3:14 am to
quote:

Unlike many germans


Sure. They just all thought they're Jewish neighbors went on vacation.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
117129 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 3:33 am to
And millions of Japanese casualties (many of those civilian).
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74571 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 4:43 am to
quote:


Link to evidence?


quote:

Operation Downfall was the name given to the planned invasion of Japan. Operation Downfall itself was divided into two parts – Operation Olympic and Operation Coronet. By mid-1945, it was apparent that the collapse of Japan was near and the Allies had to plan for the invasion of the Japanese mainland – something that they knew would be very costly in terms of lives lost. American military commanders were given the task of planning for the invasion – Douglas MacArthur,Chester Nimitz, Ernest King, William Leahy, Hap Arnold and George Marshall. Inter-service rivalry did occur as both army and navy wanted one of ‘their men’ to be supreme commander of planning. Eventually the navy accepted that MacArthur was to have total control if the invasion was to take place. The planning proceeded without taking the atomic bomb into consideration as so few knew about its existence. The Americans faced one very serious problem. They knew for sure that the Japanese would defend their territory with zeal and that American casualties would be high – probably too high for the American public to accept. The fanaticism that had been shown by the kamikazes, would almost certainly be encountered in Japan and the Americans had to plan for this. There was plenty of evidence to indicate that any invasion of the Japanese mainland would be very bloody for all concerned. The complexity of such an attack also led to both sides of the US military developing different ideas as to what the best plan should be. The navy believed that a blockade supported by an air campaign would suffice. They wanted to use air bases in China and Korea to launch bombing raids against key cities in Japan. The army believed that such a campaign would take too long and that the morale of the American public might suffer as a result. They supported the use of an invasion that would go to the heart of Japan – Tokyo. The army got its way. It quickly became apparent that any invasion of Japan would present huge difficulties. There were very few beaches that could be used as a landing place and the Japanese knew this. Both sides knew that only the beaches in Kyushu and the beaches at Kanto, near Tokyo, could support a huge amphibious landing. The Japanese took the appropriate measures in both areas. The Americans had planned to land in Kyushu first and use it as a base for planes to attack other targets in Japan. These planes would then be used to give support to the landings at Kanto. As there were so few places to land a massive force of amphibious troops, the Japanese guessed as early as 1944 where such landings would take place. The actual invasion of Kyushu was known to be fraught with dangers. Therefore, there were those in the American military who advocated the use of chemical weapons on the Japanese defenders. The use of poisonous gas had been outlawed by the Geneva Convention, but neither America nor Japan had signed this. As Japan had used poisonous gas in their attack on China, there were some in the US military who felt it was perfectly justified to use it on the Japanese. The Japanese did fear a gas attack and records do show that senior military figures in Japan wanted to ensure that if there was a gas attack, that the response of the Japanese would be such that it would not make any attack worse. American Intelligence had known for a while that Japan was in no fit state to respond to a gas attack with a gas attack. The main concern for the Americans was the potential for huge casualty rates. Nearly every senior officer involved in the planning did his own research regarding American casualties – this was based on the experience America had fighting the Japanese since Pearl Harbour. The Joint Chiefs of Staff estimated that Olympic alone would cost 456,000 men, including 109,000 killed. Including Coronet, it was estimated that America would experience 1.2 million casualties, with 267,000 deaths


You should already know this
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40882 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 5:11 am to
War...what is it good for?




Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 6:17 am to
NOT fact. An estimate.

We also ordered 15000 body bags for the first Persian Gulf war based on estimates.
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
49696 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 6:55 am to
My father was sitting on a troop transport in the Phillipines waiting to move for the invasion so he was always happy the bombs were dropped. And he already had a Purple Heart.
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22046 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 7:00 am to
Considering it took 2 of these nukes to get those frickers to quit, I'll never have a doubt in my mind it was the right move.

We'd have more to debate if they immediately surrendered after the first.

ETA: But then again, I refuse to feel sorry for a people who attacked a pacifist nation that could kick its arse.
This post was edited on 6/29/16 at 7:01 am
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
76146 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 7:09 am to
My pop was there too (in the Philippines) awaiting Olympic. Maybe they met each other?

Mine went to Sendai for a year with the occupation force.'45-'46

According to him, that was not bad duty.

Posted by K E V 8 4
Member since Jul 2010
628 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 7:20 am to
I'm not sure what would have been the outcome (and no one else does either), but I think you need to reacquaint yourself with the definition of "fact" and consider rephrasing your thread title.
Posted by LSU-MNCBABY
Knightsgate
Member since Jan 2004
25349 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 7:29 am to
Good thing dabama was over there apologizing for it
Posted by GumpInLex
Lexington, KY
Member since Nov 2011
1632 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 7:56 am to
quote:

ETA: But then again, I refuse to feel sorry for a people who attacked a pacifist nation that could kick its arse.


We've never been a pacifist nation. We were isolationist, for sure.

But yeah, i read an account from a korean woman about what it was like to be forced into being one of the "comfort women." Have never felt in any way sorry for the japs since. Nuke or no nuke, that evil culture needed to be wiped out.

LINK
Posted by eitek1
Member since Jun 2011
2907 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 8:21 am to
quote:

We also ordered 15000 body bags for the first Persian Gulf war based on estimates.


I was part of the rapid deployment element that got sent over to Saudi in August of 90. When Iraq invaded Kuwait, I was in the field at Camp Mccall. At 2am we were told "get back to your unit immediately". I had no idea what had happened in the world. When I walked in the company area through supply and saw people loading magazines using stripper clips and placing them in stacks on the ping-pong table, I knew this was the real deal.

We already had the chocolate chip uniforms from a previous exercise (how convenient). All we had to do was get our shots, make sure our insurance beneficiary was right and head to Green ramp to load up. It was raining. On the way over there our Platoon leader looked at us and said "we expect Iraq to invade Saudi Arabia, half of you probably won't come home".

It's funny that you mention the body bags. Before the invasion kicked off they told us to grab some body bags and throw them in our vehicles.

They did expect pretty heavy casualties. I'm glad it didn't happen.

Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
27093 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Considering it took 2 of these nukes to get those frickers to quit, I'll never have a doubt in my mind it was the right move.

We'd have more to debate if they immediately surrendered after the first.


Two nukes, the Soviet Union declaring war on Japan, the Japanese Emperor flat out refusing to continue the war any longer, and then the Japanese government managing to survive a last second coup attempt by hard line elements in the Japanese military.

In addition to the many American servicemen who would have likely died in the invasion the end of the war also prevented the Japanese from a planned operation to infect the West Coast of America with a new and even more horrible version of the Bubonic Plague.
Posted by Kcoyote
Member since Jan 2012
12050 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 8:38 am to
LINK

That video explains this well
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
47699 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 8:43 am to
quote:

They were not innocent people.


A young lady wrote a book called The Rape of Nanking. She was so distraught after doing her research and writing her book that she killed herself. Apparently she could not come to grips wit the depth of man's inhumanity to man.

I am linking the Wiki. It is a long read. Don't read it if you need to be in high spirits today.

Many here are familiar with it already and can vouch that it is some sick stuff.

LINK
Posted by Swoopin
Member since Jun 2011
22046 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 8:46 am to
Correct, that's what I meant.
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
26295 posts
Posted on 6/29/16 at 8:53 am to
quote:

what is this Facebook now?


+1

Stop posting facebook memes on here, gramps.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram