- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Nice try, NASA
Posted on 7/15/22 at 12:55 pm to Korkstand
Posted on 7/15/22 at 12:55 pm to Korkstand
quote:
It proves that you don't know how the world works.
quote:
If you had any clue whatsoever about geometry...and you would reach the only conclusion there could possibly be: the earth is a sphere
Hilarious, bro.
Please tell me you've got more than that.
You're hanging your ENTIRE "Spinning Ball Earf" case on the positioning of the constellations and star phenomena (within the Dome, btw) that cannot be proven" by "Science"?
Btw -- can you explain how NONE of the stars have ever changed position in thousands of years??
Not only that -- can you explain why Polaris DOES NOT EVER MOVE? It is coincidentally also located directly above the Arctic North Pole (at the center of Flat Earth).
This post was edited on 7/15/22 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 7/15/22 at 12:55 pm to Gaggle
quote:
You just show the geometry is wrong and it doesn't curve.
Except it isn't, and it does.
quote:yet here you and liberator are..
And you can stop there, you don't have to invent a million flat earth theories though you may find it fun.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 12:57 pm to Displaced
quote:I know that you didn't go test it. I know it for a fact. :)
Except it isn't, and it does.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 12:59 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
There it is folks! He discovered an undetermined circular disc or "shadow object". Case closed.
The "case" is NEVER closed.
I can admit that.
You?? You'll always defer to some NASA geek-chick and "muh authoritah" for ALL your answers.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:02 pm to Liberator
quote:
can you explain how NONE of the stars have ever changed position in thousands of years??
Not only that -- can you explain why Polaris DOES NOT EVER MOVE? It is coincidentally also located directly above the Arctic North Pole (at the center of Flat Earth).
You don't believe in space and do believe the earth is only 6000 years old.
Trying to explain the vastness and age of the universe would be like trying to teach Portuguese to a caterpillar
quote:
can you explain why Polaris DOES NOT EVER MOVE? It is coincidentally also located directly above the Arctic North Pole (at the center of Flat Earth).
It is the visible star located over our north pole
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:02 pm to Gaggle
quote:
I know that you didn't go test it. I know it for a fact. :)
And I know you haven't either, but that's not really relevant.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:06 pm to Liberator
quote:Yeah we have lots more, but you ignore it all.
Hilarious, bro.
Please tell me you've got more than that.
quote:They have. Your mind is just too small to comprehend the vastness of the galaxy and the length of time required for noticeable differences.
Btw -- can you explain how NONE of the stars have ever changed position in thousands of years??
quote:It does move. The ancient Egyptians had to use a different star or stars. In a few thousand years people will have to use a different one.
Not only that -- can you explain why Polaris DOES NOT EVER MOVE?
quote:"Coincidentally"
It is coincidentally also located directly above the Arctic North Pole (at the center of Flat Earth).
We chose it because of its present location in the sky, dumbass. It's not a coincidence.
Oh, and while we're at it, we have also chosen a South Star. How the frick does that work when literally every direction is "south" in the FE model?
This post was edited on 7/15/22 at 1:09 pm
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:12 pm to Gaggle
quote:
...you then have to create a fantastical non-sequitur theory [geometric star mapping] as explanation and claim it as the only possible explanation.
BINGO
That's called desperation.
Playing the "Explain the Southern Cross / Constellations Geometric anomalies!" card is a pretty feeble attempt at supposedly being a silver bullet that "discredits" the Flat Earth / Dome theory.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:14 pm to Liberator
quote:
That's called desperation.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:17 pm to Displaced
I did though. I don't just trust. It works out for me
You keep having faith in experts even though you don't know. They sure have your best interest at heart.
You keep having faith in experts even though you don't know. They sure have your best interest at heart.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:33 pm to Gaggle
Holy non sequitur batman.
Please tell me the specifics of your experiment.
Please tell me the specifics of your experiment.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:39 pm to Liberator
quote:
Bruh, do you know how light works? Actually, do you know how a line works? That image you posted has to be a troll.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:41 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
It also in no way allows for the 24 hours of sunlight in parts of the southern hemisphere that we exists.
This post was edited on 7/15/22 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:52 pm to Displaced
quote:That is "explained" via the insistence that no one is allowed to get near the south pole so it can't be verified.
It also in no way allows for the 24 hours of sunlight in parts of the southern hemisphere that we exists.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:55 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Oh, and while we're at it, we have also chosen a South Star.
How the frick does that work when literally every direction is "south" in the FE model?
Never heard of the 'South Star'. (Am I supposed to?)
I guess the South Star works and moves the same as all the other stars -- kinda like this:
24 secs
quote:
Your mind is just too small to comprehend the vastness of the galaxy and the length of time required for noticeable differences.
Ok...I get your frustration.
It doesn't bother me at all what physical realm of reality you believe. But don't demand that others buy into this particular PTBs Institutional Space Dogma that not only can't be proven true scientifically, it isn't proven true one lick.
We, respectively and obviously are operating in two different, separate paradigms of "reality" within this realm.
Let's deal with Facts:
NASA is already on record as admitting:
1) "WE CAN'T LEAVE EARTH ORBIT."
2) "We can't provide our past documents on the Apollo Missions and telemetry because they are long lost and destroyed."
3) 'Operation: DOMINIC' actual mission was see if they could succeed at blowing a hole through the Dome with nukes. (This proved NASA knows for sure this realm is enclosed within that Dome.)
4) Encyclopedia Britannica (1958) alluded to The Dome in Antarctica in its citatation -- as well as the Dome wall coordinates.
5) NO ONE has ever explored, recorded AND surveyed the interior of Antarctica.
6) IF the Eah is a spinning ball IN Space, ALL NASA has had to do to "prove" their claim of a GLOBE EARTH by simply using their Satellites, "Space Ships" (including the Apollo spacecraft) to tape and film the earth. OR set up a Live Feed camera there OR on The Moon OF Earth.)
Simple shut-down solution.
They couldn't do it. Didn't. Because they can't ever do it.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:57 pm to Liberator
quote:
NASA is already on record as admitting:
1) "WE CAN'T LEAVE EARTH ORBIT."
2) "We can't provide our past documents on the Apollo Missions and telemetry because they are long lost and destroyed."
3) 'Operation: DOMINIC' actual mission was see if they could succeed at blowing a hole through the Dome with nukes. (This proved NASA knows for sure this realm is enclosed within that Dome.)
4) Encyclopedia Britannica (1958) alluded to The Dome in Antarctica in its citatation -- as well as the Dome wall coordinates.
5) NO ONE has ever explored, recorded AND surveyed the interior of Antarctica.
6) IF the Eah is a spinning ball IN Space, ALL NASA has had to do to "prove" their claim of a GLOBE EARTH by simply using their Satellites, "Space Ships" (including the Apollo spacecraft) to tape and film the earth. OR set up a Live Feed camera there OR on The Moon OF Earth.)

Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:58 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
The guy is an actual, true lunatic, GI. I sorta respect it.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:59 pm to Fun Bunch
FYI he also started a 30 page thread on his disbelief that bricks could be transported by ship in the 1800s.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:59 pm to Galactic Inquisitor
I gotta say.....It's impressive that fricking "Round Earthers" have managed to troll this thread to 9 pages.
Posted on 7/15/22 at 1:59 pm to gumbo2176
quote:
The CIA, FBI, LBJ, KGB and the Mafia all had a hand in killing JFK.
Nope it was only the FBI, and J Edgar Hoover that sponsored all the assisnations of the 60's. JFK, Robert Kennedy, MLK, Malcom X, etc. Hoover did all that.
Popular
Back to top


2





