Started By
Message

re: New Orleans City Council Passes Smoking Ban

Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:42 pm to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:42 pm to
the best part of this thread is the people who show up and are like don't have to smell like smoke

...who are arguing 2 pages later about all these new concerns about health and shite

of course this isn't about using the government to legislate their preferences. no no no. this is all about health!



now that we established it's about health...well any other issue that may cause health but i like....oh no that's not the same

not because i like it...not at all!
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36332 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:42 pm to
A grown man that doesn't need a babysitter.

You're a true American hero, SFP.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:43 pm to
i know this may shock people, but even lake charles has smoke-free bars
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290881 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

the heart of this discussion is a behavior that produces a substance that creates a negative externality. end of story. that same problem applies to things like seafood and peanuts, as they create negative externalities as well



so you're telling me if I have a nut allergy, and im sitting next to a bowl of nuts at a bar, is the just as detrimental to my health as someone smoking a cigarette right next to me?
Posted by Houma Sapien
up the bayou
Member since Jul 2013
1688 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:44 pm to
What are we talking about here? If you want to smoke go to your house, camp, vehicle, whatever and smoke all the cigarettes you want. Smoke 100 at a time...who gives a shite.

Forget the "law." You have to be a massive tool to say "enjoying this cigarette is more important that being a dick to everyone else in this room."
Posted by Paige
Vice President of the OT
Member since Oct 2010
85640 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:44 pm to
=\=
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

so you're telling me if I have a nut allergy, and im sitting next to a bowl of nuts at a bar, is the just as detrimental to my health as someone smoking a cigarette right next to me?

have you ever heard stories about schools and how they deal with nut allergies?

They ban peanuts
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89131 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:46 pm to
Way to dodge the question counselor.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
60684 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

Houma Sapien



Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
86128 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

of course this isn't about using the government to legislate their preferences. no no no. this is all about health!

I have to say this, 37 pages of back and forth, and the bottom line is that this one sentence summarizes what is going on here. There's no getting around it. Some people want the government to legislate things they don't like, but stay out of the way of the things they do like. Bottom line.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

Forget the "law." You have to be a massive tool to say "enjoying this cigarette is more important that being a dick to everyone else in this room."

and you telling private property owners they can't allow smoking in their property? that's just being the nicest person ever i take it?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290881 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

have you ever heard stories about schools and how they deal with nut allergies?




that's great, but dont duck the question
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

Way to dodge the question counselor.

it's certainly more detrimental to a portion of the population than smoking is to non-smokers
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

Some people want the government to legislate things they don't like, but stay out of the way of the things they do like. Bottom line.

exactly

i try not to draw that line with consenting adults, whether it's who they want to marry, what drug they want to use, or if they want to allow smoking within a building on their property.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89131 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:50 pm to
I'm gonna need a link backing that claim up.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

that's great, but dont duck the question

i didn't duck anything. the implication of banning, other than being a direct parallel to this discussion and thus being applicable, is that it IS dangerous to people...so dangerous that they believe they need to ban it
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290881 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Some people want the government to legislate things they don't like, but stay out of the way of the things they do like. Bottom line.



yea, that goes for both sides.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

that goes for both sides.

not my side

i don't think this applies to the side of anyone arguing the same as me in this thread, either
This post was edited on 1/22/15 at 6:52 pm
Posted by Houma Sapien
up the bayou
Member since Jul 2013
1688 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:53 pm to
quote:


and you telling private property owners they can't allow smoking in their property?


Private property? Its a business Holmes. You want the FDA to keep making sure your favorite restaurant isn't serving you rat meat? Oh but wait...its a PRIVATE business they can serve all the rat they want.
This post was edited on 1/22/15 at 6:54 pm
Posted by Festus
With Skillet
Member since Nov 2009
86128 posts
Posted on 1/22/15 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

yea, that goes for both sides.

When you say both sides, you mean smokers vs non-smokers? Or government vs. people? Or something else?
Jump to page
Page First 35 36 37 38 39 ... 63
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 37 of 63Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram