- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: New details emerge on Kyren Lacy arrest, alleged hit-and-run prior to death
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:06 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:06 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
He had a mental breakdown after the accusations. Knowing no NFL team would even have him on their board. Working his whole life to make it, literally a few months away from life changing money and being able to take care of his family. Look, dude was obviously no saint, but that video paints an entire different picture than what was presented and we pretty much all (hand raised) condemned him and said some ignorant, apparently entirely untrue shite. He had it all, lost it all, and snapped. Terrible for everyone involved in this tragedy.
1
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:07 pm to Cannon
quote:
He had a mental breakdown after the accusations. Knowing no NFL team would even have him on their board. Working his whole life to make it, literally a few months away from life changing money and being able to take care of his family. Look, dude was obviously no saint, but that video paints an entire different picture than what was presented and we pretty much all (hand raised) condemned him and said some ignorant, apparently entirely untrue shite. He had it all, lost it all, and snapped. Terrible for everyone involved in this tragedy.
Exactly. I think anyone would be tested mentally by what occured and he gave in to the darkness
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:14 pm to homesicktiger
quote:
Posted speed limit is 55 MPH. So the lawyer admits Lacy's passing in a no passing zone gave the oncoming traffic ~1.35 sec of reaction time (depending on actual speeds at the time) to avoid a potential collision. Hate what happened to everyone in this situation, but this bombshell isn't the bombshell the lawyer wants you to believe.
You obviously didn’t watch the video
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:22 pm to SUB
quote:
If Lacy was making a pass and the same thing happened, would he still be at fault? For instance, if the old man is just an overly cautious person and slowed down as he saw someone passing in his direction ahead of him, and someone behind him was distracted and didn’t see him slow down and swerved into oncoming traffic and killed another driver, that would be still Lacy’s fault to you. Your logic is flawed.
If? If my Aunt had nuts she'd be my Uncle.
All you defenders are totally ignoring the critical part of what the old man said:
" He was coming head on at me". That is exactly why he braked and swerved. So Lacy jammed on his brakes and got 73 yards behind when the collision happened . So what? Any of you numbnutts think about the closing rate of a head on collison at the speed he was flying at the old man ? They'd a covered 50 or so lousy yards in a seocnd or 2.
And ever single one of us would have been on the old man's arse if he was only going 28 mph in front of us. Feed me some bullshite that says different.
Look, I liked Lacy. He was a great kid that made a tragic mistake. And it became an even worse one when he took his life. But the facts are the facts, and all the sympathy in the wolrd for him can't change them. .
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:23 pm to Finch
quote:
You obviously didn’t watch the video
Not sure it would have been within 1.35 seconds, but the green charger arrived at the scene in about 3 seconds.
Stands to reason had the collision not happened and the car coming towards him would have been a lot less than 3 seconds from when they meet.
The car in front also seemed to be going at a greater speed. Would have to read the whole report though. All sorts of things could play into what the oncoming car sees. Did Lacy and the white car both pass 4 cars so the driver saw a car behind the white car and got spooked? Did he overtake another car after it had also overtaken cars? Sounds like the white car lied to save their arse. Seems to have worked for them.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:25 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Stands to reason had the collision not happened and the car coming towards him would have been a lot less than 3 seconds from when they meet.
Stands to reason that lacy was able to be in the right lane 5 car lengths behind the closest car in front of him and not even have to slam the breaks to avoid then when they were at a complete stop.
Lacy was back in the right lane long before he woudlve encountered the car that swerved into oncoming traffic and caused the wreck.
If i caused the wreck id probably try to blame something else like a deer or aj approaching car also.
This post was edited on 10/4/25 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:40 pm to TulsaSooner78
Correct me if I am wrong but I do not recall Kyren Lacy being prosecuted or convicted of a single thing.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:49 pm to potent357
I think this is just another example of the media taking a small tid bit and people acting on emotion. Seems like Ory is stirring the pot.
All that video shows is Lacey’s car going around the wreck and the second part of a conversation between the Trooper and the guy in the truck. The general narrative now is the police made him say that in his statement to get the guy in the charger. Where is the other video from the initial conversation with the trooper and the guy in the truck? Evidently there was one as in the released one, he already has a clip board and statement form. Obviously there was already an initial conversation/verbal statement of what happened when the guy in the truck told him he had to slam on his breaks due to the charger passing and coming at him at a high rate of speed.
Seemed the cop is just telling him to make sure he put that in his written statement as he is taking that info to find the charger and they started looking off of his initial report. /statement. I don’t think he’s asking him to do it as to frame it up for him.
All that video shows is Lacey’s car going around the wreck and the second part of a conversation between the Trooper and the guy in the truck. The general narrative now is the police made him say that in his statement to get the guy in the charger. Where is the other video from the initial conversation with the trooper and the guy in the truck? Evidently there was one as in the released one, he already has a clip board and statement form. Obviously there was already an initial conversation/verbal statement of what happened when the guy in the truck told him he had to slam on his breaks due to the charger passing and coming at him at a high rate of speed.
Seemed the cop is just telling him to make sure he put that in his written statement as he is taking that info to find the charger and they started looking off of his initial report. /statement. I don’t think he’s asking him to do it as to frame it up for him.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 4:54 pm to coonass27
quote:
Seemed the cop is just telling him to make sure he put that in his written statement as he is taking that info to find the charger and they started looking off of his initial report. /statement. I don’t think he’s asking him to do it as to frame it up for him
You dont see an issue with this???
The cop was already trying to pin lacy at fault. Video shows he is encouraging the witness to say the green charger is at fault and to emphasize that instead of what the witness is telling him (the woman was at fault)
Thats tainting evidence at minimum.
This post was edited on 10/4/25 at 4:55 pm
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:09 pm to Corinthians420
quote:Which is the purpose of a trial. To prove your case as a prosecutor or to dispute the presented evidence as a defense attorney. Now we will bever know. Better question is how long as Ory had this video?
Thats tainting evidence at minimum.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:13 pm to Corinthians420
If this is in fact what happened yes I have a problem with it however I don’t think that’s what happened. Also they didn’t know it was Lacey at the time.
What I am saying is where is the earlier body cam video. Being in the video released, that there is a clip board and a statement form, leads me to believe that there was more conversation betweeen these two prior where this video starts. I’m willing to bet that the initial verbal conversation, the driver of the truck told the cop he had to slam on his breaks as the charged was heading straight towards him. That was what the cops took as the cause of the wreck and started searching for the charger.
That was not the first conversation between the two and I don’t see the cop just saying ok man we have to get this green charger and need this guy to lie. Hell how would the cops even know of a green charger if they weren’t told.
What I’m saying is, the driver of the truck told the cop prior to this video that he had to slam on breaks to avoid being hit by the charger. The cops then put an an apb for the charger off that statement. The cop was just telling the guy make sure you include it as we did all of this already based off your verbal statement and you need to be sure to include that in your written statement as we are searching for the charger because of it
What I am saying is where is the earlier body cam video. Being in the video released, that there is a clip board and a statement form, leads me to believe that there was more conversation betweeen these two prior where this video starts. I’m willing to bet that the initial verbal conversation, the driver of the truck told the cop he had to slam on his breaks as the charged was heading straight towards him. That was what the cops took as the cause of the wreck and started searching for the charger.
That was not the first conversation between the two and I don’t see the cop just saying ok man we have to get this green charger and need this guy to lie. Hell how would the cops even know of a green charger if they weren’t told.
What I’m saying is, the driver of the truck told the cop prior to this video that he had to slam on breaks to avoid being hit by the charger. The cops then put an an apb for the charger off that statement. The cop was just telling the guy make sure you include it as we did all of this already based off your verbal statement and you need to be sure to include that in your written statement as we are searching for the charger because of it
This post was edited on 10/4/25 at 5:18 pm
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:14 pm to potent357
Yeah. The cop will have his day in court. I hope he gets the maximum punishment for his crimes and how they destroyed a young mans life and those around him.
He didnt pull the trigger, but he put the dominoes in motion.
Negligent homocide for him like he tried to pin on Lacy would be justice.
He didnt pull the trigger, but he put the dominoes in motion.
Negligent homocide for him like he tried to pin on Lacy would be justice.
This post was edited on 10/4/25 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:14 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
He’s still a partial at fault party.
Ok. Good luck defending that for almost any accident of you rear ending somebody because you were following too close. You will always be at fault in the eyes of the law.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:17 pm to TigerGman
quote:
And ever single one of us would have been on the old man's arse if he was only going 28 mph in front of us.
Not close enough to where I’d have to swerve and cause a head on collision. That’s on me for being a shitty driver if that happens.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:20 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
If the 18 wheeler is able to stop and not hit anyone and go around why would they be at fault?
That’s not the point I was making. Maybe I wasn’t clear. The 18 wheeler was distracted in my example and didn’t see the slowing traffic ahead.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:24 pm to coonass27
Not sure why people are down voting my post. If the driver of the truck never told the cop he had to slam on his breaks to avoid a head on collision then yes. Eff that guy and he should be tarred and feathered.
I’m saying they only released that part of the video and I’m willing to bet there were earlier conversations between the two where the truck driver told the cop he had to slam on his breaks. Release the all the video. Not just the part that makes it look like he was being coached.
I’m saying they only released that part of the video and I’m willing to bet there were earlier conversations between the two where the truck driver told the cop he had to slam on his breaks. Release the all the video. Not just the part that makes it look like he was being coached.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:26 pm to homesicktiger
quote:
Posted speed limit is 55 MPH. So the lawyer admits Lacy's passing in a no passing zone gave the oncoming traffic ~1.35 sec of reaction time (depending on actual speeds at the time) to avoid a potential collision. Hate what happened to everyone in this situation, but this bombshell isn't the bombshell the lawyer wants you to believe.
Oh, it definitely is.
There’s no way that Lacy should have been hemmed up for negligent homicide and the other charges from what that video shows. We were all told something different when it happened and this paints a completely different picture.
Lacy had next to nothing to do with this crash.
This post was edited on 10/4/25 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:47 pm to brass2mouth
quote:We were told a lot of things earlier. Let me ask again - How long has Ory had this video?
We were all told something different when it happened and this paints a completely different picture.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 5:52 pm to potent357
quote:
How long has Ory had this video?
Don't have an answer for you but I am.sure he released it as soon as he reviewed all of the DA's evidence.
Posted on 10/4/25 at 6:16 pm to redstick13
quote:
You’ve spent the past 24 hours plus making a point of how this is viewed from the 504 area code.
I live in 504 and don't agree with Chad.
I think Chad is reaching.
KL is guilty of illegal passing. Funyun's tailgating and hard left maneuver caused the accident.
She was probably stuffing her Funyun hole and not paying attention to driving. She didn't apply her brakes until it was too late and she ditched left. She stated that she was going to try to get into the parking lot. I believe she was too close to the truck to see the Hall vehicle approaching
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News