- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Navy admits UFO videos are real
Posted on 9/17/19 at 9:38 pm to Jake88
Posted on 9/17/19 at 9:38 pm to Jake88
If the craft in the video is so easily identifiable as commercial aircraft then why werent the navy pilots able to identify as such and why is the Navy now saying the craft's in these videos are unidentifiable?
Posted on 9/17/19 at 9:39 pm to ThinePreparedAni
quote:
NY Times: Pentagon’s UFO Program - aerospace/esoteric/quantum mechanics pg19 update*Posted on 12/16/17 at 4:25 pm
quote:
Luis Elizondo, who led the Pentagon effort to investigate U.F.O.s until October. He resigned to protest what he characterized as excessive secrecy and internal opposition to the program.
Yep. Excessive secrecy because the people in the know want to keep everyone else out.
They don't want some lower level guy poking around and looking for things because he just may find it.
I'd say these things are 99% earth made and 99% made by the US.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 9:45 pm to Jim Rockford
The most troublesome reveal from the pilot interviews was that these craft appeared to be tracking the carrier battle group across the globe. The Italian government officials that revealed one of the craft actually took down a military helicopter was also shocking. I was honestly expecting a shitty Ancient Aliens type show from Delonge and his group but Udentifiable on the History Channel had some truly compelling testimony from those Navy Pilots and radar crews.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 9:53 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
say these things are 99% earth made and 99% made by the US.
If the maneuvering capabilities of these craft are anything close to what these naval pilots are describing then this is not a propulsion technology that any nation on earth could possibly possess. Maybe the pilots are exaggerating...who knows but let's say it is ours. Why would we be testing any experimental aircraft any where near where a carrier was performing manuvers or other aircraft was in the area? Why would our pilots be told to intercept and put pilots lives at risk?
This post was edited on 9/17/19 at 9:55 pm
Posted on 9/17/19 at 9:59 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
All this points to is a next level technological advance, not necessarily aliens
I'm leaning more towards this than aliens. Because of this.
quote:
The D12 drone, which hasn't been in service in nearly 50 years was capable of flying at 90k feet and mach 3.3
quote:
The Lockheed A-12, which evolved into the famed SR-71, wasn't revealed officially until 1990. 22 years AFTER it's final mission was flown and 38 years after its first flight.
The SR-71 flew Mach 3.2 and at 85,000 feet in 1966. Just for reference the first handheld calculator was invented in 1967 and the first RAM chip wasn't invented until 1968. So we had 2 dudes literally flying around the earth going Mach 3 before people had a calculator in their hand. One of the key components to a computer processor would not even be invented for another 2 years yet we had the technology to achieve this. And this was over half a century ago! You guys really think the government doesn't have some secret aircraft that could possibly be doing this?? Yea, ok..
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:01 pm to Jim Rockford
Are these the same videos that came out like a year ago?
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:05 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
Why would we be testing any experimental aircraft any where near where a carrier was performing manuvers or other aircraft was in the area? Why would our pilots be told to intercept and put pilots lives at risk?
Perhaps to see how effective the new tech was in real world scenarios as well as to gauge our pilots and ships responses? Or it could have been a trial to see how effective the recon of the new tech was and the pilots engaged when the new tech was unsuccessful.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:13 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:
And to think acknowledgement of ET life should be one of the biggest moments in earthlings life.
The idea that this is alien life from the far reaches of the galaxy, or beyond, defies the laws of physics as we currently understand them.
The possibility that these can be from another dimension, however, does not.
This post was edited on 9/17/19 at 10:15 pm
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:14 pm to TigerinATL
The guy in the video replicates what is seen in the Navy footage filming other planes. The skeptoid link says that many pilots do recognize it as camera artifact.
Take is as you will.
Take is as you will.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:33 pm to Jake88
quote:One thing that isn’t explained is that at least one of the pilots said they saw the object with their own eyes. Not through the infrared camera.
Skeptoid
Youtube
He also mentioned that when it left, it sped away instantly. If it was a plane, that would be impossible.
This post was edited on 9/17/19 at 10:35 pm
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:36 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:Maybe they saw wrong. They aren't immune to the shortcomings of an eyewitness.
One thing that isn’t explained is that at least one of the pilots said they saw the object with their own eyes.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:39 pm to Jake88
You also have the Navy officially acknowledging these as AAVs. Why wouldn’t they just dismiss them as glare if that’s what it is?
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:39 pm to Jake88
quote:They all saw wrong? And you didn’t address the second point about it speeding away.
Maybe they saw wrong. They aren't immune to the shortcomings of an eyewitness.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:53 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
re real by TigerFanatic99
If we are to assume those three videos are authentic, I don't see how anyone isn't uncomfortable with what is unknown.
I’m uncomfortable because, just think what’s on the videos they haven’t released and what they aren’t talking about
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:56 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:I don't know. Was that on video or just report of the pilot? If these objects are readily reproducible by others with their infrared cameras, it's likely artifact in the videos released. But, that's not a fun explanation.
And you didn’t address the second point about it speeding away.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:57 pm to GAFF
quote:
The Lockheed A-12, which evolved into the famed SR-71, wasn't revealed officially until 1990. 22 years AFTER it's final mission was flown and 38 years after its first flight.
Sr 71 flew until 1998
Posted on 9/17/19 at 10:59 pm to Jim Rockford
If ufo are real. So is Sasquatch.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 11:01 pm to TigerinATL
Who in the Navy is acknowledging it? Some guy named Grandishear, I think. Who is he? The Navy spent $22,000,000 on a project started by a kook who donated significant money to Harry Reid...
quote:
What was reported by the New York Times was that the Advanced Aviation Threat Identification Program (AATIP, sometimes given as the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program) was the brainchild of Harry Reid, then a senator from Nevada... The funding was reported to be $22 million over five years, with most of it going to Robert Bigelow, a Nevada hotel billionaire and space entrepreneur. The project was run at the Pentagon by a mysterious man named Luis Elizondo. That's all well and good, seems legitimate enough; and bolstered by the very impressive UFO videos, it's understandable how the story captured the attention of news agencies — and the public — worldwide.
But what they probably didn't know was the dubious history of the cast of characters behind AATIP. The central figure was Bigelow, known to NASA for Bigelow Aerospace, but known to the UFO and paranormal communities for Skinwalker Ranch. It's a 480-acre property in Utah which Bigelow purchased in 1996 after learning stories of paranormal activities said to happen there: cattle mutilations that he believed were the result of alien experimentation, UFO sightings, ghost lights, and trans-dimensional and shapeshifting beings.
Posted on 9/17/19 at 11:15 pm to Jake88
quote:That's not true. All they proved was that an airplane might not look like an airplane on the infrared camera.
I don't know. Was that on video or just report of the pilot? If these objects are readily reproducible by others with their infrared cameras, it's likely artifact in the videos released. But, that's not a fun explanation.
It doesn't mean the objects in the videos are also airplanes.
Anyway, here is one of the pilots describing what he saw:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDj9ZZQY2kA&t=28s
Also keep in mind that the only reason they were out there anyway is because this UFO showed up on the radar and they were sent 100 miles off the coast of San Diego to go check it out.
Popular
Back to top



0





