- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Investigators When they KNEW Murdaugh lied (Page 112)
Posted on 2/28/23 at 11:58 am to KosmoCramer
Posted on 2/28/23 at 11:58 am to KosmoCramer
Thank you
0
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:00 pm to Tigerfan56
I absolutely believe you can’t say what you would do in an unthinkable situation like that and in that much grief. But he knew he had seen them less than an hour ago. Either there is no killer, or a very scary killer that can’t be far away.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:03 pm to STLhog
quote:Because he wanted it to appear unprofessional pissed off kids/parents/family from the boat accident.
If he hired a professional, why mess with two guns?
And again, why be anywhere near the vicinity when it was going down? He could have had an airtight alibi.
Why not multiple quick shots with the AR for all of them.
None of it makes sense. I also think he could have avoided splatter, wouldn't most of it have gone backwards anyway?
I think the two guns used was something last minute that went haywire we may never know about it?
Two shooters? One shooter grabbing another gun (maybe even Pauls gun he had always loaded and near?) not wanting to reload?
If it was a murder/suicide whether done by someone else or not-AM chickened out.
I saw in testimony there are many trails at Moselle with ATV's golf carts as transportation.
The dogs barking alerting Paul could be because the shooter was used to being there? There was commotion with Paul fooling with the dogs, the barking of the shooters presence didn't stand out?
This post was edited on 2/28/23 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:15 pm to cajunangelle
Was there an insurance policy for Alex Murdaugh's life, or was there just said to be such a policy?
After the payout of the blanket policy to Mrs. Satterfield's estate, wouldn't the insurance industry have been hesitant to write an even bigger policy on AM's life?
After the payout of the blanket policy to Mrs. Satterfield's estate, wouldn't the insurance industry have been hesitant to write an even bigger policy on AM's life?
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:18 pm to real turf fan
quote:
Was there an insurance policy for Alex Murdaugh's life, or was there just said to be such a policy?
AM stated there was a $10M policy in his follow-up interview with police after the roadside shooting.
quote:
After the payout of the blanket policy to Mrs. Satterfield's estate, wouldn't the insurance industry have been hesitant to write an even bigger policy on AM's life?
No idea.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:19 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Paul was looking at jail time for the Timmy boat accident death. Paul had to be killed in AM's drug addled mind because the motive was hate from the boat accident.
But why? Let Paul go to jail.. Who gives a shite. All of the financial shite had come out before the murders so what difference does it make at that point?
quote:
Maggie is rumored to have found a large amount of AM's pills (her browser history showed her looking up 30Mg oxycodone after finding a duffel bag of pills)
Maggie is rumored (news articles) to have ordered a forensic audit of the family finances.
Maggie most likely would not have kept all of the current day secrets to herself. She would have been left broke, ashamed, in hiding. Paul going to jail for even 5 years would have killed Maggie. The boys were her life.
Again.. Who cares. Paul did something stupid and should accept the consequences. Alex was on pills and Maggie was curious about their finances.. I still don't see any reason to kill them.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 12:22 pm to Triple Bogey
quote:
All of the financial shite had come out before the murders so what difference does it make at that point
Uhh, no it didn't.
quote:
Again.. Who cares. Paul did something stupid and should accept the consequences. Alex was on pills and Maggie was curious about their finances.. I still don't see any reason to kill them.
AM and MM were potentially civil liable if they provided the booze to Paula ND let him run around and do whatever he pleased.
The theory that some are purporting is a triple homicide to clear Buster liability from the boat case. But I believe that the Murdaugh estate could be collected on from civil action related to the boat case, so the triple murder theory is a unlikely to me.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:01 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Uhh, no it didn't.
But was it enough damming financial stuff to come out to warrant murdering your son? He took $10 million from his clients. Madoff took more and didn't kill anyone. You make a deal, you do your time, you "pay" restitution, and that's that. Something more is going on to make this a plausible scenario.
quote:
AM and MM were potentially civil liable if they provided the booze to Paula ND let him run around and do whatever he pleased.
The theory that some are purporting is a triple homicide to clear Buster liability from the boat case. But I believe that the Murdaugh estate could be collected on from civil action related to the boat case, so the triple murder theory is a unlikely to me.
None of these scenarios make sense by going scorched earth. All of this seems extremely tame to go on a killing spree. AM over his head in a drug ring funding scheme where they took out PM & MM as a clear message makes way more sense at this point.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:04 pm to Cajunhawk81
quote:
None of these scenarios make sense by going scorched earth
There could’ve been other people implicated (his partners) had Maggie gone through with the forensic investigation into their finances
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:12 pm to clownbaby
I've been near to a person hooked on opiates. There is no explanation as to their behavior. It's like the original person is not there. Their actions make no sense, they don't remember having conversations. Add that to a lying SOB and you have AM.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:14 pm to MBclass83
quote:
There is no explanation as to their behavior. It's like the original person is not there. Their actions make no sense, they don't remember having conversations.
I could buy this, but this wasn't a new thing.
The guy has been allegedly addicted to pills for decades.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:14 pm to MBclass83
That’s true.
At this point I don’t think we’ll ever know the truth. The prosecution has done such a bad job putting the pieces together and the defense has done a good job poking holes.
At this point I don’t think we’ll ever know the truth. The prosecution has done such a bad job putting the pieces together and the defense has done a good job poking holes.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:18 pm to clownbaby
Yep, Alex will be not guilty for sure.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:21 pm to MBclass83
Lol at you gullible arse people who actually believe this guy is a drug addict.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:23 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
Yep, Alex will be not guilty for sure.
Either that or hung jury. I think AM was probably involved somehow and may have even been the one to have done it, but there is absolutely reasonable doubt just from how bad the investigation was and how the state has presented the case.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:27 pm to Tiger Ryno
I honestly believe AM was not an addict. Opiate addiction , over time, escalates. No way can an "addict" function in a productive manner for that many years.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:36 pm to MBclass83
Theory that hasn’t been floated:
AM had a very stressful day. Was confronted by a member of his firm about the embezzlement. Dying to get home and get a fix. Gets there and Paul and Maggie have found his pills and hidden them. He has to act sorry and submissive but he’s DYING for his fix now. He can’t get it because of them. So, goes down to kennels trying to act ok, snaps, can’t stand it any longer, kills them, races back to house, races around looking for the pills, finds them, then starts covering up. He only had to do a minimal amount of coverup then, because they didn’t search his home for months. The investigation was pathetic, mostly because of who he is.
AM had a very stressful day. Was confronted by a member of his firm about the embezzlement. Dying to get home and get a fix. Gets there and Paul and Maggie have found his pills and hidden them. He has to act sorry and submissive but he’s DYING for his fix now. He can’t get it because of them. So, goes down to kennels trying to act ok, snaps, can’t stand it any longer, kills them, races back to house, races around looking for the pills, finds them, then starts covering up. He only had to do a minimal amount of coverup then, because they didn’t search his home for months. The investigation was pathetic, mostly because of who he is.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:39 pm to lesserof2weevils
I mean, at this point why shouldn’t we rule out that theory. It’s just as plausible as most others in my opinion. I think it’s likely that he knows who did it but can’t say it because they’ll kill him too. Related to his addiction somehow.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:41 pm to MBclass83
quote:
I honestly believe AM was not an addict. Opiate addiction , over time, escalates. No way can an "addict" function in a productive manner for that many years.
I did and got raises/promotions for almost 7 years.
Posted on 2/28/23 at 1:42 pm to TDsngumbo
This fella has some New Iberia bangs.
Page 69 of 112
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News