- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Morganza Spillway may or may not open for a 3rd time -- lack of clear info from ACoE
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:01 pm to Fat and Happy
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:01 pm to Fat and Happy
quote:
It would greatly depend on the part of Baton Rouge.
If it broke at downtown, north Baton Rouge would have some issues but it’s still gonna flow towards the southern part.
If it broke more around gardere, all of that area and all of those neighborhoods on Nicholson and Burbank would be fricked
Basically on the east bank of the river the levee starts around north st. (not to be confused with North Blvd.). There really isnt a man made levee north of that, The natural bluff along the river in baton rouge starts to get further and further away from the river south of north st.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:02 pm to Fat and Happy
quote:
If it broke at downtown, north Baton Rouge would have some issues but it’s still gonna flow towards the southern part.
If it broke downtown, then it would still primarily flow South along Nicholson, flood the lower portion of LSU including the PMAC and Tiger Stadium, and then keep on going toward Brightside and then eventually to Bayou Manchac -> Amite River -> Lake Maurepas.
North BR is generally higher ground.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:02 pm to TDsngumbo
Use the loop to evacuate.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:04 pm to keyboard_warrior9
quote:
the quad would be safe,
you're right, the water would never go to the quad, too many better floods there before it, could never live up to them
This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:04 pm to TDsngumbo
It will only hit gradere and north BR. Because weather events and natural disasters are racist
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:04 pm to Picayuner
quote:
we wouldn't lose the ports in Baton Rouge and New Orleans, but would lose ALL DRINKING WATER FOR BOTH CITIES FOREVER !!!!!!!!!!!!
Uhh..
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:06 pm to Picayuner
quote:
we wouldn't lose the ports in Baton Rouge
Not so fast my friend.
Water would only come up to sea level if the MS River got diverted. Thats a hell of a lot of dredging and digging to make up that difference at the BR port.
Also the petro chemical corridor would be totally fricked as they lose their fresh water intakes.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:07 pm to TDsngumbo
Pain
This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:07 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
I'm genuinely curious what happens if the forecast crest of 43' in BR occurs (which we have every reason to believe it will and this is by no means record levels) and then a 4' section of levee washes away sometime over night due to the increased pressure on the levee at a time when it's saturated from heavy rain since November. Where would all that water spread out to? It would eventually (within a couple days I'm sure) flow into the Comite and Amite Rivers, flooding Livingston, Ascension and St. James parishes pretty badly as well.
Just to put it into perspective: The 2016 flood was caused by about 7.1 trillion gallons of water dropped in 3 days.
The Mississippi River flows about 700,000 cubic feet per second at max, which is about 5.25 million gallons per second. At that rate, it would take 1,350,000 seconds to put the same amount of water heading toward the Amite and Comite. That would take 15.5 days to equal the same amount of water, and that's if the Mississippi goes completely dry downstream of BR because it's busy monkeyfricking us.
The short answer is I have no fricking clue.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:08 pm to NYNolaguy1
They'd figure out some way to divert enough water to the Mississippi River's current channel to keep it navigable.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:14 pm to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
Just to put it into perspective: The 2016 flood was caused by about 7.1 trillion gallons of water dropped in 3 days.
quote:
That would take 15.5 days to equal the same amount of water, and that's if the Mississippi goes completely dry downstream of BR because it's busy monkeyfricking us.
That 7.1 trillion gallons of water dropped in 3 days in 2016 was across an area from Hammond to Lafayette southward to Houma. That's not 7.1 trillion gallons of water all going through the Amite and Comite during the 2016 flood. If the Mississippi levee breaks in the BR area, you'd see 2.2 trillion gallons of water flowing only through EBR, Livingston, and Ascension parishes after 5 days. Theoretically it would take much longer than 5 days to plug up the levee.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:15 pm to TDsngumbo
Everything west of highland rd and south of LSU would be fricked
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:24 pm to TigerstuckinMS
Negatory Mississippi hit 1.5 million cfs in 2011. Its over 1 million cfs rn
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:26 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
Anyone here with actual real knowledge of this type of scenario? What would that look like?
I don't know, but i I have a feeling property values in the neighborhoods east of highland road would increase quite a bit.
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:28 pm to foj1981
Probably do about one billion dollars in improvements
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:28 pm to Wtodd
I just had a smoothie and it feels like I'm gonna shite myself
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:29 pm to TDsngumbo
highland road is the natural levee that ends the flood plain so up that area where the elevation changes
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:34 pm to TDsngumbo
I know we wouldn't have that new downtown library anymore
Posted on 2/22/19 at 2:39 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
4' section
would erode to a 100 yard section within minutes
This post was edited on 2/22/19 at 2:48 pm
Popular
Back to top
