- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

More Statue Toppling: Cecil Rhodes in Oxford, England
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:42 pm
quote:
The vote followed a fierce debate between those who argue the statue of the Victorian imperialist is proof that Oxford is "institutionally racist" and therefore must be toppled and those who believe we can't erase the past and think the statue should stay.
quote:
Arguing against the motion, Professor Nigel Biggar, who teaches moral and pastoral theology at Christ Church, Oxford, said that if the statue of Rhodes must fall, then statues of Winston Churchill should also be removed.
quote:
For months students of the Rhodes Must Fall movement have been campaigning for the removal of the statue from Oriel College because of his views on other races and his colonial past.
quote:
Professor Biggar said: "If Rhodes must fall, so must Churchill, whose views on empire and race were similar. And so probably must Abraham Lincoln. While Lincoln liberated African-American slaves, he doubted they could be integrated into white society and favoured their separate development—their apartheid—in an African colony."
He added: "If we insist on our heroes being pure, then we aren’t going to have any. Last year the shine on Mahatma Gandhi’s halo came off, when we learned of his view that Indians were culturally superior to black Africans. Should this blot out all his remarkable achievements? I think not."
He said: "Rhodes was not racist. He didn’t hold black Africans in general contempt. He didn’t view them as biologically inferior and incapable of cultural development. In 1899 he defended the right of blacks to vote. He stipulated that his scholarships be awarded regardless of race. And the first Rhodes Scholarship was awarded to an African American within five years of his death."
quote:
Ntokozo Qwabe, Rhodes Scholar and RMF campaigner who has been branded a hypocrite for taking money from the Rhodes Trust, said: "We are here to take back the money. I will not be told that I'm a hypocrite for taking money that was stolen from my people."
quote:
in the end it was those behind the Rhodes Must Fall (RMF) campaign who won the minds of those taking part in the debate.
LINK
This post was edited on 1/20/16 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:43 pm to John Keating
These SJWs are ruining America. frick them. If we ignore them they will go back to mommy and daddy.
ETA it's in England. Still stupid though
ETA it's in England. Still stupid though
This post was edited on 1/20/16 at 3:45 pm
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:44 pm to TigersHuskers
quote:
These SJWs are ruining America.
quote:
Oxford
Hmmm.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:44 pm to John Keating
quote:
Professor Nigel Biggar
Obvious racist
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:44 pm to John Keating
Dang. Just destroying history.
If ya'll don't know the life of Cecil Rhodes, please read up on him. Dude was pretty fascinating.
If ya'll don't know the life of Cecil Rhodes, please read up on him. Dude was pretty fascinating.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:45 pm to John Keating
quote:
Ntokozo Qwabe, Rhodes Scholar and RMF campaigner who has been branded a hypocrite for taking money from the Rhodes Trust, said: "We are here to take back the money. I will not be told that I'm a hypocrite for taking money that was stolen from my people."
Holy Christ..... I'm at a loss for words.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:45 pm to ProjectP2294
OMG THEY ARE NOW ATTACKING CECIL RHODES AT OLE MISS!
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:46 pm to John Keating
If these SJWs were a bit less ignorant and less narrowly focused, they'd know that Cecil Rhodes was even more socialistic than they are.
This post was edited on 1/20/16 at 3:48 pm
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:49 pm to John Keating
quote:
He said: "Rhodes was not racist. He didn’t hold black Africans in general contempt. He didn’t view them as biologically inferior and incapable of cultural development. In 1899 he defended the right of blacks to vote. He stipulated that his scholarships be awarded regardless of race. And the first Rhodes Scholarship was awarded to an African American within five years of his death."
Looking back that was probably a mistake.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:51 pm to TigerNlc
Poli Board , but would they replace them with Lenin, Marx or maybe Hillary and Obama
Posted on 1/20/16 at 3:55 pm to John Keating
quote:
"If we insist on our heroes being pure, then we aren’t going to have any.
This is a great line. Also, bringing up Abe Lincoln was a nice touch. Also, didn't MLK beat his wife or something? I could be thinking of someone or something else. Either way, people have flaws. You can't just erase history of all flawed people without losing all of your history.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 4:05 pm to John Keating
I hate SJW's and think they will continue to ruin this country.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 4:20 pm to John Keating
I wish all those SJWs would keep that tape over their mouths. I'll even help them tape their hands and feet.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 4:23 pm to John Keating
Pretty sure half the people in this thread don't realize this concerns the UK, not the US. At least in specific terms.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 4:36 pm to SabiDojo
quote:
Dang. Just destroying history.
If ya'll don't know the life of Cecil Rhodes, please read up on him. Dude was pretty fascinating.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 4:43 pm to DestrehanTiger
quote:
Abe Lincoln was a nice touch. Also, didn't MLK beat his wife or something? I could be thinking of someone or something else. Either way, people have flaws. You can't just erase history of all flawed people without losing all of your history.
Spot on.
There is a lot of selective double standard reasoning and, in some instances, just bold ignorance with this wave of historical cleansing.
I find it troubling when there are instances of book burning or statue toppling because someone does not agree with certain viewpoints and/or modern principles are applied to judge individuals from generations ago. You can still disagree or judge the individual without removing the historical work. There appears to be a movement to wipe out any remembrance or symbol of a past or alternative view. It is quite intolerant.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 5:01 pm to John Keating
quote:
There appears to be a movement to wipe out any remembrance or symbol of a past or alternative view. It is quite intolerant.
Unfortunately, this seems to be the growing norm. If you don't agree with these people's views, you're tagged a racist. I think Moon, Jr. had other motives when he brought the idea of statue removal to life.
Posted on 1/20/16 at 5:11 pm to John Keating
I'm starting a new movement to have the ancient pyramids of Egypt destroyed. We shouldn't allow the Egyptians and their leaders to be glorified for enslaving the Jews.
#NomoredeNile
#NomoredeNile
This post was edited on 1/20/16 at 5:12 pm
Popular
Back to top

11










