- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Meteor broke apart over Houston - update pg3: meteors diff places + fireballs over Austin
Posted on 3/22/26 at 12:14 pm to OysterPoBoy
Posted on 3/22/26 at 12:14 pm to OysterPoBoy
You really don’t know how physics works do yo?
Hollow and/or gold core would both change the weight of the meteor which is then both used to track inside of the calculation.
They can calculate the speed pretty easily with satellite and technology they have today. Then they can also track how long it took to burn. So if it burns up at x kgs /ms, they can calculate it pretty easily how much it weighed inside a margin of error. Plus I’m sure of it was say 1,890 lbs it’s just easier to say 1-ton.
Hollow and/or gold core would both change the weight of the meteor which is then both used to track inside of the calculation.
They can calculate the speed pretty easily with satellite and technology they have today. Then they can also track how long it took to burn. So if it burns up at x kgs /ms, they can calculate it pretty easily how much it weighed inside a margin of error. Plus I’m sure of it was say 1,890 lbs it’s just easier to say 1-ton.
Posted on 3/22/26 at 12:14 pm to OysterPoBoy
Delete please. Service issue. Double post.
This post was edited on 3/22/26 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 3/22/26 at 12:35 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
How could they possibly know its weight?

Posted on 3/22/26 at 12:38 pm to Misnomer
quote:
I'd be surprised if they weren't aware of the object long before impact and decided not to warn people
I would guess they didn't know about it for more than 12 hours or a day at most. They ran the numbers and found because of the angle and makeup of it there was an overwhelming chance of it breaking up, which it did.
Humanity's ability to detect objects is not nearly as good as we would hope it to be. Something this small was likely not captured until some backyard amateur astronomer came across it and called it in.
Posted on 3/22/26 at 1:22 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
29 miles up. Five times higher than most flights, and we "got lucky?" Pandering to retards.
Wouldn't the 29 miles up be the lucky part the guy speaks of?
Posted on 3/22/26 at 4:21 pm to OysterPoBoy
Per ChatGPT:
1) Brightness -> Energy -> Mass (Photometric Method)
The primary observable from eyewitnesses or cameras is brightness (apparent magnitude).
Key principle:
• Meteors emit light due to ablation and ionization as they decelerate.
• That light output is proportional to kinetic energy loss.
2) Trajectory + Deceleration ? Density & Mass
With multiple observers or cameras, you can reconstruct the 3D path.
What’s measured:
• Entry velocity (typically 11–72 km/s)
• Deceleration profile
• Fragmentation events
Interpretation:
• Rapid deceleration high up ? low-density (cometary material)
• Deep penetration with little slowing ? dense, iron-rich body
By fitting observed deceleration to drag models, you can estimate:
• Mass
• Bulk density
• Structural strength
3) Duration, Fragmentation, and Terminal Behavior
Visual cues provide qualitative constraints:
Indicators:
• Long-lasting fireball (several seconds) ? larger mass
• Multiple flares ? fragmentation events (release of kinetic energy)
• Terminal burst (bolide) ? catastrophic breakup ? energy spike
Empirical scaling:
• Small meteors (grams): brief streaks, <1 sec
• Fireballs (kg–tons): several seconds, visible fragmentation
• Large bolides: explosive energy (e.g., Chelyabinsk meteor)
4) Sound (Infrasound) and Shockwave (If Available)
For larger events:
• Delayed sonic booms help estimate altitude and energy
• Infrasound arrays can quantify total energy ? back-calculate mass
It goes on a little but emphasizes models vary in their estimates and it’s not an exact science
1) Brightness -> Energy -> Mass (Photometric Method)
The primary observable from eyewitnesses or cameras is brightness (apparent magnitude).
Key principle:
• Meteors emit light due to ablation and ionization as they decelerate.
• That light output is proportional to kinetic energy loss.
2) Trajectory + Deceleration ? Density & Mass
With multiple observers or cameras, you can reconstruct the 3D path.
What’s measured:
• Entry velocity (typically 11–72 km/s)
• Deceleration profile
• Fragmentation events
Interpretation:
• Rapid deceleration high up ? low-density (cometary material)
• Deep penetration with little slowing ? dense, iron-rich body
By fitting observed deceleration to drag models, you can estimate:
• Mass
• Bulk density
• Structural strength
3) Duration, Fragmentation, and Terminal Behavior
Visual cues provide qualitative constraints:
Indicators:
• Long-lasting fireball (several seconds) ? larger mass
• Multiple flares ? fragmentation events (release of kinetic energy)
• Terminal burst (bolide) ? catastrophic breakup ? energy spike
Empirical scaling:
• Small meteors (grams): brief streaks, <1 sec
• Fireballs (kg–tons): several seconds, visible fragmentation
• Large bolides: explosive energy (e.g., Chelyabinsk meteor)
4) Sound (Infrasound) and Shockwave (If Available)
For larger events:
• Delayed sonic booms help estimate altitude and energy
• Infrasound arrays can quantify total energy ? back-calculate mass
It goes on a little but emphasizes models vary in their estimates and it’s not an exact science
This post was edited on 3/22/26 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 3/23/26 at 11:42 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/23/26 at 11:55 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/24/26 at 12:00 am to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:00 am to hawgfaninc
So now we’re panicking about meteors? Sorry, “fireballs.”
Posted on 3/24/26 at 6:05 am to Havoc
This is an example of one of those things that happen every single day but internet retards and the media decide to start covering them and make it seem like we’re having some huge increase and are under attack.
Posted on 3/24/26 at 10:06 am to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/25/26 at 8:41 pm to SundayFunday
I didn’t see this thread the other day, but I was outside on my tractor NW of Houston when this happened and it sounded like a bomb going off.
Is it that these are just getting reported more, or have there been more large meteors lately? At least 4 in the past week over the US.
Most recent meteor
Is it that these are just getting reported more, or have there been more large meteors lately? At least 4 in the past week over the US.
Most recent meteor
Posted on 3/26/26 at 10:18 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/26/26 at 10:20 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/26/26 at 10:23 pm to hawgfaninc
Popular
Back to top

0











