- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: McKnight shooter released from custody...Cliffnotes of Normand press conf inside
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:00 pm to tgrbaitn08
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:00 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
Will smiths killer followed Smith, got out if his car and approached an unarmed Smith and shot him in the back as well as his unarmed wife sitting in the passenger seat. Much different secnario.
He followed only after a hit and run incident. I believe Will had a weapon also. Not sure which weapon his wife was shot with.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:05 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
Please state those facts. Thanks.
Facts (based on reasonable evidence):
-Previous road rage incident for Gasser.
-Shooting four miles from initial incident.
-Cars parallel to one another at intersection.
-One man armed (Gasser). Other man unarmed (McKnight).
-One man in his car. One man outside his car and at passenger window of other car.
-No apparent damage to window or vehicle.
-No indication Gasser was assaulted.
-Multiple shots fired. Suspect hit three times.
There are no facts to suggest Gasser was under extreme duress. Whether he had the legal right to shoot is not what I'm debating. We don't have enough facts to make that assessment. My assessment is that Gasser is an idiot for allowing the situation to escalate into a shooting. Read my posts. They have been consistent with this idea since my first post earlier this evening. I have not once stated I believe Gasser is guilty, only that he is stupid.
This post was edited on 12/2/16 at 9:17 pm
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:06 pm to PointsInCase
I suggest you continue to concentrate on your current means of livelihood while the sun is up.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:07 pm to PointsInCase
There are no facts to suggest he wasn't under duress.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:13 pm to PointsInCase
Where are the facts that you said point to Gasser being an idiot?
Thanks. I'll wait.
Thanks. I'll wait.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:15 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
There are no facts to suggest he wasn't under duress.
Straw man argument. I didn't say duress. I said extreme duress.
His window was rolled down. Victim approached from passenger side. Victim was unarmed. No apparent damage to vehicle.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:16 pm to the808bass
quote:
I suggest you continue to concentrate on your current means of livelihood while the sun is up.
I suggest you stop believing what you want to believe instead of what is likely to be true.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:21 pm to PointsInCase
quote:
His window was rolled down. Victim approached from passenger side. Victim was unarmed. No apparent damage to vehicle
You are so naive, and biased
None of that suggests he may not have been under EXTREME duress. You're twisting inconsequential things to build a narrative in your mind
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:21 pm to PointsInCase
quote:
It points to the possibility that McKnight was not the only aggressor
Were others involved besides McKnight and Gasser or do you not know what "aggressor" means?
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:26 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
You are so naive, and biased
None of that suggests he may not have been under EXTREME duress. You're twisting inconsequential things to build a narrative in your mind
You're operating under the assumption that judges and juries have all the facts in front of them. They never do. Assessments must be made based on the limited information that is available.
My assessment is based on the limited information we have available at this time. My assessment may change when we get new information.
Whether or not the victim was armed is not inconsequential. The proximity of the victim is not inconsequential. Have you ever been to a court room?
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:26 pm to lsu480
He is some special kind of stupid. I've seen a lot os shite on this board but I think this moron takes the cake.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:27 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
None of that suggests he may not have been under EXTREME duress. You're twisting inconsequential things to build a narrative in your mind
No shite! I mean if anyone who has ever been to worldstarhiphip sees a black male between 13-30 coming at them even slightly pissed off over something that most people would not think is a big deal they have every right to fear for their lives and defend themselves accordingly. There are videos of black males attaching white people for no reason posted on the internet all day long, every day. It is gonna make some white people scared and want to defend themselves.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:28 pm to PointsInCase
quote:
I suggest you stop believing what you want to believe instead of what is likely to be true.
I don't "want" to believe anything. That's you.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:28 pm to lsu480
quote:
Were others involved besides McKnight and Gasser or do you not know what "aggressor" means?
Aggressor is not a mutually exclusive descriptive term in a conflict. There can be two aggressors, one aggressor, or no aggressors in a conflict.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:28 pm to PointsInCase
quote:
by PointsInCase
About those facts that point to Gasser being an idiot. Where can I find them?
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:30 pm to the808bass
quote:
I don't "want" to believe anything. That's you.
You are giving the benefit of the doubt that Gasser is not an idiot despite strong evidence that suggests he is stupid. That is you believing the unlikely based on personal bias in favor of Gasser.
Again, I haven't condemned Gasser. He may well have been within the confines of the law to do what he did. But the evidence we have suggests he dumb to end up in that situation.
This post was edited on 12/2/16 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:33 pm to PointsInCase
quote:
You are giving the benefit of the doubt that Gasser is not an idiot despite strong evidence that suggests he is. That's you believing the unlikely based on personal bias.
There's not strong evidence to suggest he is. There is your bias to suggest he is. If the evidence shows in the next week that he's an idiot, I won't have an issue saying "he's an idiot." You won't likely be able to ever say it wasn't his fault no matter what evidence comes out. I wish you luck in your quest.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:33 pm to PointsInCase
quote:
There are no facts to suggest Gasser was under extreme duress
All the facts aren't even out yet. Like Normand said, stop assuming you know anything.
He even said he wishes he could tell the public what he knows right now. Insinuating that Gasser is acting within the law.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:33 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
About those facts that point to Gasser being an idiot. Where can I find them?
Hurr durr. He shot a guy. Idiot. Idiot.
Posted on 12/2/16 at 9:34 pm to PointsInCase
quote:
-No apparent damage to window or vehicle.
-No indication Gasser was assaulted.
uh, these are not even remotely 'facts'
Popular
Back to top


0




