Started By
Message

re: Maternity leave in the USA...

Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:10 am to
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71992 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:10 am to
quote:

Reading the OP, this is kid #6. So she gets 12 weeks for each kid times 6. That's 72 months off maternity leave plus a presumed two weeks a year Vacation. Over a twenty year career that is 40 weeks vacation plus holidays plus 72 weeks maternity. Even my LA public school math says she is getting over 10% of her career as PTO before retiring. Wow.


even if this were the case (it's not-read again) the entire point is that the company decides if this is worth it or not. There are no mandatory requirements.

Some of you are so combative; I hope you're not business owners or hiring managers. If someone receives benefits like this, she is likely a huge asset to the company. You find ways around when they are out, but you know damn good and well they are coming back to work. Instead of treating your employees like they are always trying to frick you over, how about go over and beyond for them so that they actually fricking enjoy working for you.

OP's daughter is not a grocery bagger. She likely has a pretty important role with Progressive. High producing sales person, claims manager, etc. And a lot of times in this industry when the perks are this significant, you have to suffer in other areas. Long hours, 50+% travel, high expectations, etc etc
Posted by laangler21
On the lake.
Member since May 2012
3034 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:11 am to
Wife was offered 10 weeks full pay, she started getting stir crazy so she went back in 5 for both our kids. Small legal office, she's been there for 12 years, most senior by far, doubt he offers the same deal to everyone, if anyone for that matter.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71992 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:12 am to
quote:

I just tilt my head sideways a lot when I talk to people about this subject and they are adamant that paid maternity leave should be 12 months, fully paid and mandatory.



I 100% do not believe you that you have heard that from numerous people.
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
15822 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:14 am to
This is the very reason companies with good hiring practices have exit interviews and surveys.

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91302 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:17 am to
Seriously, more like a 40 year career. You may not stay with one company, but 20 years is the career length of either an OT baller or a Democrat.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52505 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:17 am to
We're having our first child in September. My wife's employer doesn't offer maternity leave until you've been with the company 5 years and she will have been there 4 when the baby arrives. She has to use her personal vacation days and short term disability.
This post was edited on 4/15/16 at 9:25 am
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
59055 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:19 am to
Congrats on the baby.

I assume she'll hit the 5 year mark post September?
Posted by Black n Gold
Member since Feb 2009
15822 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:19 am to
That's some terrible planning.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91302 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Wife was offered 10 weeks full pay, she started getting stir crazy so she went back in 5 for both our kids. Small legal office, she's been there for 12 years, most senior by far, doubt he offers the same deal to everyone, if anyone for that matter.


I've got some bad news for you - your wife is probably sleeping with her boss.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
59055 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:20 am to
Marinated a little too early.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71992 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:20 am to
Yep. Funny you mention that. I left a large brokerage a couple of years ago and was brutally honest in my exit interview. It wasn't 3 months later and they had all new management. Granted, I was 1 of many that left in about a year time span, but the point is that corporate was able to learn how shitty our head of office was treating the service staff. No way they could have known without those exit interviews because otherwise the only information available to them would have come from our head of office anyways, who was the problem.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52505 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:22 am to
quote:


I assume she'll hit the 5 year mark post September?

No, I meant to say she'll be at 4 years when the baby is due.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71992 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:23 am to
Wow, that sucks. Does she plan on going back to that employer? I don't know how I could sleep at night if I were her boss.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91302 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:23 am to
quote:

She has to use her personal vacation days and short term disability. 


Which probably means she's getting 100% for 5 weeks and 60% for the next 3 assuming 2 weeks vacation and 8 weeks STD. Not to shabby.
Posted by ForeverLSU02
Albany
Member since Jun 2007
52505 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:24 am to
quote:

That's some terrible planning.
Considering we'd been trying for the last 3 years to get pregnant with no luck we're ecstatic. We were beginning to have our doubts
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7037 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:25 am to
When I worked for PricewaterhouseCoopers women got 6 weeks paid, then could use vacation, then could take FMLA. It was not uncommon for women to be out 6 months. New fathers got 3 weeks paid. Now either parent can get 6 weeks consecutive or three weeks throughout the year.

If it helps to retain talented employees it is a small investment.
Posted by Benne Wafer
Member since Jan 2015
455 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:25 am to
I agree.

And you guys do realize there are three states in the US who mandate some sort of paid maternity leave? And guess what, it seems to be working. Obviously for the employees and not hurting businesses to the catastrophic levels that people go on about.

Some excerpts from this article:LINK
quote:

Wojcicki reported the rate at which new moms left Google fell by 50% when in 2007 it increased paid maternity leave from 12 weeks to 18 weeks. "Mothers were able to take the time they needed to bond with their babies and return to their jobs feeling confident and ready. And it's much better for Google's bottom line — to avoid costly turnover, and to retain the valued expertise, skills, and perspective of our employees who are mothers."


quote:

In 2004, California became the first state to implement a paid-family-leave policy that enables most working Californians to receive 55% of their usual salary (up to $1,104) for a maximum of six weeks.

Since then, only New Jersey and Rhode Island have actualized similar programs.

According to a report last year from the President's Council of Economic Advisers, more than 90% of employers affected by California's paid family-leave initiative reported either positive or no noticeable effect on profitability, turnover, and morale.


This is another really good article but it wouldn't let me C&P.
LINK
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12366 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Your wife's employer is paying your wife for work. Your wife is not working as a result of her decision to have a child. Your wife's employer owes your wife nothing.


This is why women in America feel like they aren't afforded proper opportunities. This mentality does two things: keep women from achieving in the workforce and keeps high achieving women from having children, both of which should be encouraged by our society.

Your 1950s, Norman Rockwell ideal of America life is a relic of the past. Time to grow with the rest of the world, or get passed by. Your mentality shows that you have no idea how to handle women in the workforce and would simply rather they be barefoot and pregnant.

I'm sure you're not alone, particularly on this board, but your breed it is adying.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
71992 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:25 am to
quote:

Which probably means she's getting 100% for 5 weeks and 60% for the next 3 assuming 2 weeks vacation and 8 weeks STD. Not to shabby.



And no vacation or short term disability. Hope she stays safe! That's a dog shite company policy.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
59055 posts
Posted on 4/15/16 at 9:27 am to
Either way, congrats bud.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram