- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mass child sacrifice discovery may be largest in Peru
Posted on 8/29/19 at 11:51 am to Darth_Vader
Posted on 8/29/19 at 11:51 am to Darth_Vader
AR 15 fault
Posted on 8/29/19 at 11:54 am to Salmon
quote:
you should watch Bone Tomahawk
My buddy and I were talking about this movie with my ex and her friends about two years ago (transplant uber-progressive Yankees). He used the word "savages" to describe them and I could hear a pin drop until I busted out laughing. Totally appropriate use of the word for what was portrayed in the movie, but they were aghast.
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:02 pm to Salmon
quote:
my point is the morality shifts and evolves and I find it increasingly annoying how people love to apply todays morality standards to those in the past
You won't answer the question... is child sacrifice objectively morally wrong and on what basis from your worldview?
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:07 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
You won't answer the question...
because it isn't relevant and is ultimately uninteresting
quote:
is child sacrifice objectively morally wrong and on what basis from your worldview?
I am morally opposed to child sacrifice.
This post was edited on 8/29/19 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:14 pm to Darth_Vader
And people think the world is fricked up today..
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:20 pm to eScott
I might do a SG1 rewatch. That was a fun show.
And Samantha Carter
And Samantha Carter
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:21 pm to Salmon
quote:
because it isn't relevant and is ultimately uninteresting
So you are morally opposed to child sacrifice, but it isn't objectively morally wrong correct?
I doubt it is uninteresting to you... you were interested enough to make your opinion known on the subject and repeatedly respond. I get it... I wouldn't want to face the reality of moral relativism either.
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:24 pm to ctiger69
quote:we're blaming video games now, keep up
AR 15 fault
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:30 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
So you are morally opposed to child sacrifice, but it isn't objectively morally wrong correct?
correct
quote:
I wouldn't want to face the reality of moral relativism either.
you face it everyday
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:36 pm to Darth_Vader
primitive people were brutal. Who knew?
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:40 pm to Darth_Vader
"Human sacrifice" is kinds the "global warming" of anthropological studies these days. If a researcher can attach "human sacrifice" to their outline, they have a much better shot at getting funding and general academic acceptance of their work.
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:44 pm to teke184
quote:
how peaceful and in tune with the Earth that Montezuma and the Aztecs were
This is a terrible myth. Even in North America, they weren't some eco friendly people who were peaceful.
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:47 pm to Salmon
quote:
correct
Yes... based on the moral relativists reasoning, Hitler gassing the Jews and child sacrifices are not objectively immoral. Your worldview is powerless to stop the Mao's, Hitler's and Stalin's of this world because for the moral relativists logically the only truth is that might is right.
quote:
you face it everyday
Yes I face people with that worldview everyday. Many believe it without following it to its logical conclusion. I don't hold to that worldview. I would quickly become a nihilist if I held such a worldview. The moral relativist who isn't a nihilist is merely pretending to believe in moral relativism.
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:53 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
Your worldview is powerless to stop the Mao's, Hitler's and Stalin's of this world because for the moral relativists logically the only truth is that might is right.
just curious, but how were Mao, Hitler and Stalin stopped?
Posted on 8/29/19 at 12:59 pm to Salmon
quote:
just curious, but how were Mao, Hitler and Stalin stopped?
Well Mao and Stalin were not stopped. More accurately stated... for the moral relativist, there cannot be a claim that Mao, Stalin and Hitler were wrong in committing genocide and murder. They did what was accepted by the culture right?
On the argument that we are evolving morally... Child sacrifices still happen in India. Sex slaves are still rampant throughout many cultures. Compare the morality of 1700s US with the morality of 1940s Germany... which represents an evolved sense of morality?
Posted on 8/29/19 at 2:36 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:Wrong. The murdering culture accepted it OK. The ones BEING murdered were disarmed and rendered helpless.
They did what was accepted by the culture right?
Posted on 8/29/19 at 3:21 pm to Salviati
quote:No. Maybe “slaughtered” was the wrong word to use, but there’s no doubt that many tribes were savages and brought their destruction upon themselves by their actions against the settlers.
Such proud and noble people. And people wonder why we slaughtered them.
Unintentional irony?
This post was edited on 8/29/19 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 8/29/19 at 3:36 pm to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:
Wrong. The murdering culture accepted it OK. The ones BEING murdered were disarmed and rendered helpless.
I don't know what your point is. If the majority of people in a society accept an action then it has become culturally acceptable. So whether it is child sacrifices, genocide or slavery for the moral relativist - those cannot be absolute wrongs. Whatever the culture decides is morality is morality (from the perspective of a moral relativist).
Posted on 8/29/19 at 3:38 pm to CivilTiger83
quote:
If the majority of people in a society accept an action then it has become culturally acceptable
Would you say the members of the societies you named (Hitler's Germany, Mao's China, etc.) accepted the actions of their leaders on their own accord or because they didn't really have any other choice?
Posted on 8/29/19 at 3:48 pm to Salmon
quote:
Why? Great movie.
I liked it, but holy frick it's violent.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News