Started By
Message

re: Manhattan Congestion Pricing Takes Effect Today

Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:09 pm to
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
58443 posts
Posted on 1/5/25 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

That's any sales tax.


Well, that's any tax. The difference is government intervention is the sole purpose of an excise tax like this one, tobacco taxes, and liquor taxes. The goal is to collect none of the tax because the goal is to end, or at least significantly reduce, the practice being taxed.

quote:

And that is NEVER stopping.


At least not for as long as we can pretend we're collecting taxes to fund it, but in reality these are state-level taxes that aren't funding much of what you describe in any way.

quote:

I just don't see a fundamental difference between this and other sales taxes.


I already recognized that you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to taxation. You didn't need to explicitly admit it to the whole website.
This post was edited on 1/6/25 at 12:37 am
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
62850 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 5:03 am to
quote:

Seems to work well for London.



Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
38627 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:27 am to
quote:

At least not for as long as we can pretend we're collecting taxes to fund it, but in reality these are state-level taxes that aren't funding much of what you describe in any way.


Don't you support a national sales tax in lieu on income taxes? Regardless, each states spends several billion per year on healthcare of its residents.
quote:

The goal is to collect none of the tax because the goal is to end, or at least significantly reduce, the practice being taxed.



No it's not lmao. You think places like Colorado and California want to end marijuana use? It's a boon for those states. You think NYC wants 0 automobiles to drive into lower manhattan? It's a use tax. They want the added revenue. If they actually wanted no one to drive into lower manhattan, they wouldn't be giving discounts or rebates to low income people.

quote:

I already recognized that you don't know what you're talking about when it comes to taxation. You didn't need to explicitly admit it to the whole website.


You're the person who supports insane sales taxes in lieu of anything else, only to admit you'd make your large purchases in jurisdictions that have lower sales taxes. You're a guy who wants to live in a functioning society, but you want everyone else to pay for it.
Posted by Gifman
Member since Jan 2021
14913 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:28 am to
NYC is such a shithole
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
36597 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:54 am to
quote:

We spend billions and billions on healthcare for problems that can be linked to obesity. Shouldn't people who partake in being fat carry more of that weight?(lol)


Fify.

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282189 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 6:56 am to
So the fart sniffers want to charge you money to watch them in their natural habitat.

Seems fitting for New York.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
23714 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 7:27 am to
They are encouraging people to use the subway so they can get killed.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
85390 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Part of the fee is dedicated to public transportation


But that’s not how this stuff actually works out in the end

For example, if this new “fee” raises $10 million a year, that money will go to public transportation as stated.

But where it really becomes a tax is when the government, knowing they are about to get $10m in new money, goes and takes $10 million from their original public transportation budget and reallocates it to something else that has nothing to do with transportation.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
38627 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 7:39 am to
Yes they should. Fat people are disgusting and should be heavily penalized for the burden they cause.
Posted by Magnus
San Diego
Member since Sep 2019
1718 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 7:59 am to
i like the idea, keeps the trash out...
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
55569 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 8:03 am to
quote:

Poor people aren't driving into Manhatten.


That's not correct. There are quite a few apartment buildings throughout lower Manhattan with parking. For those who live there who don't have vehicles, many use Uber or other rideshare services (and those drivers aren't often considered "wealthy").
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
58443 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 8:11 am to
quote:

Don't you support a national sales tax in lieu on income taxes?


Yes. Consumption taxes would be absolutely preferable to income taxes. In the American system of taxation, excise taxes are not the same as income or sales taxes. You keep trying to make a connection that does not exist. Let me reiterate for you, again, that I have yet to find an excise tax that I support. In my view, they are as close to theft as income and property taxes.

quote:

You think places like Colorado and California want to end marijuana use?


I'm sorry you cannot follow a conversation. I clearly stated that this tax is like alcohol and tobacco taxes in that the purpose, at least partially, is to reduce usage. These types of taxes are most successful when they eliminate the problem they're seeking to address. The problem they've identified here is that there is too much congestion in Manhattan. The solution they've identified is an actually insane tax, as opposed to sales taxes (which are completely normal). If this tax is completely successful, they'll eventually end up collecting nothing on it. Regardless, it absolutely won't be a budgetary windfall for them.

quote:

You're the person who supports insane sales taxes in lieu of anything else, only to admit you'd make your large purchases in jurisdictions that have lower sales taxes. You're a guy who wants to live in a functioning society, but you want everyone else to pay for it.


Everyone is going to make purchases that cost them less. That has nothing to do with preferring consumption taxes over compulsory taxes. It's just common sense. But by all means, you feel free to pretend I should act like no one else and go out of my way to pay more for purchases. All you've essentially done is show you're incapable of discussing this topic honestly.
This post was edited on 1/6/25 at 8:15 am
Posted by holmesbr
Baton Rouge, La.
Member since Feb 2012
3558 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 9:32 am to
9 won't be enough. Pistol caliber should start with a 4.
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
14626 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 10:02 am to
quote:

to claim places like paris and prague were clean


Anyone who said Paris is clean is either medically retarded or their mom did a lot of high level drugs during pregnancy while drinking and eating mcdonalds.

Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
14626 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 10:03 am to
Its going to eventually look like the old time castles where they close the drawbridge door every night after they kick out the riff raff.

Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34044 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

The goal is to collect none of the tax because the goal is to end, or at least significantly reduce, the practice being taxed.


No one should ever believe this. The government wants the practice to continue because they want it as yet another way to squeeze money from their citizens.

If 0 cars came into Manhattan the day following this coming into effect, they'd quickly try and find a different way to tax the citizens and get the money. They could also just ban or severely limit the amount of cars entering but they don't. They want your money.
This post was edited on 1/6/25 at 10:32 am
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
34044 posts
Posted on 1/6/25 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Regardless, it absolutely won't be a budgetary windfall for them.



You sure about that?

quote:

The Independent Budget Office of the City of New York estimated that congestion pricing would generate $400 million in revenue in the first year and $1 billion annually after that.


quote:

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) estimated that the tolls would generate $15 billion in capital for improvements to the subway, bus, and commuter rail systems.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram