- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man robs bank, arrested, then robs another bank right after being freed because of new law
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:20 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:20 am to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
A teller said they were handed a threatening note.
Based in what you just said he should not have been released.
I’m actually not arguing that point. I think reasonable people can disagree about where to draw the line. However, propaganda pieces like this are used in an attempt to fully dismantle any move to a presumption of non monetary bond, and I think that’s bullshite.
1
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:24 am to Placebeaux
The. citizenry who vote for this shite deserve everything they get and more. These types of laws and the trend towards “progressive” (read regressive) district attorneys will be the downfall.
There is no reason or logic behind these trends and the people will reap what they sow.
There is no reason or logic behind these trends and the people will reap what they sow.
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:26 am to Demshoes
quote:
There is no reason or logic behind these trends and the people will reap what they sow.
There is no reason or logic behind moving away from presumptive monetary bail instead of using a risk/threat assessment? Weird. Someone should probably let the entire federal judiciary know.
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:52 am to Placebeaux
That dudes court date will be months from now so he will have plenty of time to rob many many more banks
Posted on 1/13/20 at 11:09 am to Joshjrn
quote:
There is no reason or logic behind moving away from presumptive monetary bail instead of using a risk/threat assessment? Weird. Someone should probably let the entire federal judiciary know.
Not up on federal criminal law but the offenses that it applies to in Nee York are ridiculous. I doubt a bank robber would not be automatically released in the federal system. No issue with risk assessment for non-violent offender. Otherwise.....
Posted on 1/13/20 at 11:13 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Since when is robbery a non-violent crime?
when a weapon isn't used
Posted on 1/13/20 at 12:12 pm to Joshjrn
I didn’t read any posts past the OP. I just posed my question that came to mind. Read some of the article and saw the “Threatening note”.
I didn’t think we were arguing at all.
You answered my question is all I know.
I didn’t think we were arguing at all.
You answered my question is all I know.
Posted on 1/13/20 at 12:19 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
Since when is robbery a non-violent crime?
when a weapon isn't used
But a note of threat was used and a teller can only assume the robber is armed. A threat of violence with no weapon should make no difference robbing a bank, business, or person.
Posted on 1/13/20 at 12:22 pm to Placebeaux
Democrats are ruining this country. I don’t understand how people vote this way. I guess free shite.
Posted on 1/13/20 at 12:44 pm to tLSU
quote:
Soros
This post was edited on 9/24/20 at 4:05 pm
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News