- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man Demonstrates A Big Flaw In 911's Jet Fuel Argument
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:35 pm to TX Tiger
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:35 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
A. Compartmentalization took care of a lot of that.
Wouldn't more than a few individuals in each "compartment" be able to put 2 and 2 together, once they witnessed the end result? Seems like there are thousands upon thousands of potential death bed confessions in the waiting, no?
1
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:36 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Up vote for you, Roger. Well done. 
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:38 pm to Y.A. Tittle
They disregard pic and video evidence, audio evidence, science, and physics. They're entire premise is based on some wealthy boogie men and global conspiracy that do not know anything about.
There's no helping them.
There's no helping them.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:38 pm to LSURussian
Iraq's central bank was under the control of the British. Their whole central banking system changed in 2003 after the fall of Hussein
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:40 pm to LSURussian
quote:
He refuses to acknowledge physical evidence. His make believe world is much more convenient for him. He can go through life believing his failure as a person results from "them" keeping him down.
Correct. He's been told it's all fabricated and by god we're just too stupid to see it.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:40 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Wow. #1,2, and 3 is TX Tiger to a tee
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:41 pm to Errerrerrwere
I have no idea one way or the other, but when I was a kid there was a plane that crashed in Kenner and my dad was called as a first responder to help. We dropped my dad off and I remember seeing wreckage and bodies everywhere.
Why weren't we there any bodies at the Pentagon and in the field in PA?
Like I said, I have no stance on the issue but this is always what I think about having first hand knowledge of a plane crash and what it looks like.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
You have first hand knowledge of what ONE plane crash looked like.
It's generally accepted (by us sheople) that United 93 and the Pentagon plane crashes were both high speed impacts. The crash you saw in Kenner, Pan Am 759, was a 727 struggling to stay barely above stall speed for about a mile. A wingtip first hit treetops about 4/10ths of a mile past the end of the runway. The major impact was almost to Roosevelt and W. Metairie, close to a mile from the runway. There was an extensive debris field, undoubtedly the result of relatively low airspeed and the acute angle of impact.
Why weren't we there any bodies at the Pentagon and in the field in PA?
Like I said, I have no stance on the issue but this is always what I think about having first hand knowledge of a plane crash and what it looks like.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
You have first hand knowledge of what ONE plane crash looked like.
It's generally accepted (by us sheople) that United 93 and the Pentagon plane crashes were both high speed impacts. The crash you saw in Kenner, Pan Am 759, was a 727 struggling to stay barely above stall speed for about a mile. A wingtip first hit treetops about 4/10ths of a mile past the end of the runway. The major impact was almost to Roosevelt and W. Metairie, close to a mile from the runway. There was an extensive debris field, undoubtedly the result of relatively low airspeed and the acute angle of impact.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:42 pm to Choctaw
quote:
Wow. #1,2, and 3 is TX Tiger to a tee
Amazing what these people have in common. I do believe it's a personality disorder.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:42 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:President Karzai claimed the mineral deposits are actually worth $30 trillion. LINK
So, basically, 90% (give or take a couple of percent or so) of the entire wealth of the world is, one way or another, tied to Afghanistan. (shite, how many TRILLIONS again?)
quote:It is mind-boggling how much wealth is out there. Far more than the average person could comprehend.
Who the hell knew? Blows my freaking mind!
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:43 pm to Choctaw
The fact that he doesn't believe we landed on the moon pretty much says it all
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:43 pm to TX Tiger
Good debate guys, I think us conspirators will call this one a W though. I'm out of cell service, heading to the woods.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:44 pm to Shepherd88
quote:
I think us conspirators will call this one a W though.
Oh, no doubt.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:44 pm to Shepherd88
quote:First of all, no it wasn't. The British complied with the decade long international sanctions on Iraq prior to the U.S. coalition attacking Iraq. The Central Bank of Iraq was run by Saddam's family and clan.
Iraq's central bank was under the control of the British.
And secondly, you've gone from "Iraq didn't have a central bank" to "Iraq had a central bank."
You're in way over your head on this topic.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:45 pm to Shepherd88
quote:
I think us conspirators will call this one a W though.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:51 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
That's EXACTLY what I said the U.S. did...
IN THE 80s! Not 12 or 15 years later in Oct., 2001.
You can't possibly be this retarded. You've got to be fricking with me.
Calm down, it'll be alright.
America fought with the terrorists in Afghanistan to make sure Russia didn't control what they went back in a decade later to control.
It's why Afghanistan didn't want us helping them in the first place. They knew we'd be back to do more damage to them than the Russians could.
It's why we had to send in an operative to talk them into it.
Any idea who that CIA operative was?
----------------------------------------------------------------
If we fought with the terrorists to control what we didn't want the "Russians" to control, why didn't we just stay when the Soviets bailed out in 1989?
Is Hamid Kharzai the CIA operative you're referring to?
That's EXACTLY what I said the U.S. did...
IN THE 80s! Not 12 or 15 years later in Oct., 2001.
You can't possibly be this retarded. You've got to be fricking with me.
Calm down, it'll be alright.
America fought with the terrorists in Afghanistan to make sure Russia didn't control what they went back in a decade later to control.
It's why Afghanistan didn't want us helping them in the first place. They knew we'd be back to do more damage to them than the Russians could.
It's why we had to send in an operative to talk them into it.
Any idea who that CIA operative was?
----------------------------------------------------------------
If we fought with the terrorists to control what we didn't want the "Russians" to control, why didn't we just stay when the Soviets bailed out in 1989?
Is Hamid Kharzai the CIA operative you're referring to?
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:58 pm to LSURussian
quote:
He can go through life believing his failure as a person results from "them" keeping him down.
You've never laid eyes on me and now you claim to know everything about me. Your infatuation is getting a little weird.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 5:59 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:Yes, and some of those have since come forward. Is this news to you?
A. Compartmentalization took care of a lot of that.
Wouldn't more than a few individuals in each "compartment" be able to put 2 and 2 together, once they witnessed the end result? Seems like there are thousands upon thousands of potential death bed confessions in the waiting, no?
Posted on 12/17/15 at 6:01 pm to Shepherd88
quote:Be safe.
Good debate guys, I think us conspirators will call this one a W though. I'm out of cell service, heading to the woods.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 6:03 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Thanks for the link. Some of that sounds familiar!
I have a close relative who is kind of like this, but I think his frequently contrarian stance is largely just to rile people up purely for his own personal entertainment. I don't think he really believes half the shite he says. Or maybe he's crazier than I think...
I have a close relative who is kind of like this, but I think his frequently contrarian stance is largely just to rile people up purely for his own personal entertainment. I don't think he really believes half the shite he says. Or maybe he's crazier than I think...
Posted on 12/17/15 at 6:04 pm to White Roach
quote:Because it was largely a covert operation plus we didn't have anywhere close to the manpower there at the time as we would if declaring all out war on them.
If we fought with the terrorists to control what we didn't want the "Russians" to control, why didn't we just stay when the Soviets bailed out in 1989?
quote:Nope.
Is Hamid Kharzai the CIA operative you're referring to?
ETA: But isn't it interesting that Afghanistan refused the pipeline deal with Unocal, and then when we invade and take over we make Unocal's Kharzai their President.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 6:08 pm
Page 24 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News