Started By
Message

re: Man carries AR-15 rifle into Atlanta's Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport

Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:10 am to
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126635 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:10 am to
quote:

Terrorists, beware


until they use open carry to just walk up in the airport
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54838 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Guy abides by the law, exercises freedom, gets crapped on.

People get criticized everyday for freely and legally doing stupid things. Just because an action is legal and protected (speech, right to bear arms, etc.)it doesn't exempt the actor from criticism.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:14 am to
The recent terrorist is Boston had knives and was prepared to die to take someone out. Fortunately the FBI had been monitoring his phone and stopped him in route to his attack.

I have an idea. No more patriot act, no more phone monitoring and let's make sure terrorists know they can walk into a crowed public building with AR-15 assault rifles at will in certain states.

Sounds like a good plan to help them accomplish their objectives imo.
Posted by Porter Osborne Jr
Member since Sep 2012
43172 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:15 am to
Gotta love the AJC a newspaper dropping race into this. What would happen if a black man did this? Gtfo with that crap.
Posted by BeerMoney
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2012
8797 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:16 am to
It's not overkill and it's not asking for trouble. It's this sort of indifference and conflict avoidance that has us in the big brother / nanny state as it is.
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126635 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:23 am to
quote:

It's not overkill and it's not asking for trouble. It's this sort of indifference and conflict avoidance that has us in the big brother / nanny state as it is.


Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15911 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:30 am to
This is what our forefathers had in mind
Posted by TigerPanzer
Orlando
Member since Sep 2006
9476 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 10:57 am to
quote:

This is what our forefathers had in mind

More like Rambo, Dirty Harry and the Rifleman.
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:04 am to
quote:

So what's the acceptable level of visibility or gun type that will not offend all of the people who otherwise claim to be in support of 2nd amendment and open carry rights?

Is the rifle is okay but 100 rounds is too much? If so, how many rounds is okay for him to have?

Is the size of the gun a problem, but a smaller rifle or handgun equally visible would be okay?

If he was concealing the rifle, would that be okay? Out of sight out of mind?

Or are we just back to suggesting open carry is never appropriate because it makes people uncomfortable?


Some common sense and understanding of normal social cues would help you in answering this question
Posted by MadDoggyStyle
Member since Feb 2012
3857 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:07 am to
quote:

“If you don’t exercise your rights, the government doesn’t have any hesitation taking them away,” Cooley told WBS-TV Channel


I agree with him.
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:08 am to
quote:

It is dumb and attention seeking but it does help raise awareness as to open carry laws and rights.


It has the same effect as Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson have on civil rights. They hurt more than they help.
Posted by gatorrocks
Lake Mary, FL
Member since Oct 2007
13995 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:08 am to
I hate people like this.

I carry every single day of my life. But guess what... No one knows I do.

This fricktard gives good guys with guys a bad image.

frick him.
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:11 am to
quote:

I have an idea. No more patriot act, no more phone monitoring and let's make sure terrorists know they can walk into a crowed public building with AR-15 assault rifles at will in certain states.

Sounds like a good plan to help them accomplish their objectives imo.


You best believe the AR-toting heroes of Tigerdroppings would not hesitate for a second to shoot a terrorist dead and save the day.
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
25108 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:18 am to
quote:

Daughter is a legit WYHI.


She is, but I'd say iwnhi. My biggest fear, is accidentally knocking her up, then having her father's genes take over, and my son having a tiny dick and a double digit iq.
This post was edited on 6/5/15 at 11:18 am
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
25108 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:25 am to
And really, what if 50 Muslim anti-gun activists with beards decided to do the exact same thing? Would it still be cool, and a good idea to allow?

I'll hang up and listen.
Posted by Crawdaddy
Slidell. The jewel of Louisiana
Member since Sep 2006
19101 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:26 am to
rights are rights no matter who you are.
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:27 am to
quote:

rights are rights no matter who you are.


That's easy to say now because it supports your current argument...but how would you REALLY feel?
Posted by CCTider
Member since Dec 2014
25108 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Crawdaddy
rights are rights no matter who you are.


Yeah, because nobody on the rant would have a problem setting this scene while waiting to check your bags...



And it would be legal. Maybe they could even get a brass band and second line around the place, dancing with their rifles like they're parasols.
Posted by WG_Dawg
Member since Jun 2004
89632 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:37 am to
quote:

“If you don’t exercise your rights, the government doesn’t have any hesitation taking them away,” Cooley told WBS-TV Channel


quote:

I agree with him.


There are far, far less douchey ways to exercise his rights.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18702 posts
Posted on 6/5/15 at 11:54 am to
So I have to ask, why would a terrorist walk up in the airport with a semi-automatic rifle? To kill a bunch of people, right? Not to board a plane or do anything with planes, right?

If that's the case, why does it have to be an airport? There are plenty of public spaces with large amounts of people with little-to-no security stopping such a person.

So at that rate, why does it matter if guns are banned in airports before the security screening?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram