Louisiana Senate passes constitutional carry.

I knew it felt more dangerous outside

quote:

---

knew it felt more safe outside

---

We’ll go ahead punk make my day

quote:

---

How can you concealed carry a pistol at 18 but can’t purchase one until your 21… doesn’t make any sense.

---

How come you can serve and die for our country at 18 but can’t drink til 21? Doesn’t make any sense.

Constitutional carry should be federally legal in all 50 states. I don’t care what any suburban white women who votes blue has to say.

Notice how the people who are the most anti-gun have never even touched a gun in their life and know absolutely nothing about them?

The problem with constitutional carry is there's no way of knowing how proficient the gun owner may be. There's two general ends of the spectrum.

First time owning a gun? Take lessons from a firearms expert, learn how it operates, and learn that pulling a gun can be in most cases a last resort. Think before you engage.

Former military with a combat infantry MOS and combat experience? I trust them not to accidentally blow my head off during a chaotic event.

With CCP's we had a way to ensure the holder had basic proficiency. Constitutional carry eliminates that.

You need a license to drive a car and demonstrate proficiency. It should be the same for a dangerous weapon capable of ending life, deliberately or accidentally. Like a car.

Let the downvotes rain in.

quote:

---

I support the concept but realize we have a lot of idiots out there

---

Hood rats

quote:

---

The problem with constitutional carry is there's no way of knowing how proficient the gun owner may be. There's two general ends of the spectrum. First time owning a gun? Take lessons from a firearms expert, learn how it operates, and learn that pulling a gun can be in most cases a last resort. Think before you engage. Former military with a combat infantry MOS and combat experience? I trust them not to accidentally blow my head off during a chaotic event. With CCP's we had a way to ensure the holder had basic proficiency. Constitutional carry eliminates that. You need a license to drive a car and demonstrate proficiency. It should be the same for a dangerous weapon capable of ending life, deliberately or accidentally. Like a car. Let the downvotes rain in.

---

Here’s an upvote.

The idea of living in a society where most people are responsible, and respect the heavy responsibility of learning how to use a firearm and the good judgement to not use it unless absolutely necessary has long passed us by.

Perhaps the vast majority culture of responsible firearm ownership will return out of necessity with this law being passed. I hope it gets here sooner rather than later.

In the meantime, requiring training, even with it’s pitfalls, is worth considering.

quote:

---

Hood rats

---

They’re already carrying bro.

We’re just evening the playing field.

quote:

---

el Goucho

---

quote:

---

I knew it felt more dangerous outside

---

So you felt the need to say the same thing on two separate threads?

quote:

---

The problem with constitutional carry is there's no way of knowing how proficient the gun owner may be. There's two general ends of the spectrum.

---

I’m sure the hoodrats in south Chicago who have glock switches agree with your statement. And Chicago has some of the strictest gun laws in the country, yet it’s in the top 10 most violent cities in the US. Criminals don’t give a frick about gun laws, they never have and never will. Law-abiding citizens should have the right to defend themselves in the public. Period.