- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana law to ban sex with animals wins Senate vote 25 - 10
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:36 pm to Jim Rockford
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:36 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
One of these is my senator
Mine too - Claitor
0
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:37 pm to YatInTheHat
That dolphin guy is gonna come to Louisiana and campaign for dolphin loving rights now
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:37 pm to YatInTheHat
So I’ve been wasting time using my hand all these years when my dog is just sitting there available.
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:38 pm to biglego
quote:
So I’ve been wasting time using my hand all these years when my dog is just sitting there available.
He's been dropping all those hints for years and you're just now seeing them.
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:38 pm to BowlJackson
quote:
Is bestiality that big of a problem in 2018 Louisiana?
This is why you can't trust a politician:
quote:
"You can find anything on the internet, unfortunately," Morrell said. "There is a huge market, an unfortunate market, of trafficking animals for sex acts."
Morrell said that there are currently places where people in Louisiana advertise seeking animals for sex acts or offer up their own pets for abuse.
Absolute pure hyperbole.
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:40 pm to TH03
I realize, just chose this thread to bitch about their similar actions on the marriage laws
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:44 pm to TH03
The more I read about this bill, the more I would have voted nay.
So instead of striking down the "crimes against nature law" altogether, they are simply carving out the animal portion of it and leaving the original law on the books. The original law is unconstitutional, but leave it to LA legislators to leave it untouched for political gain.
quote:
Present law provides that crime against nature includes the unnatural carnal copulation by
a human being with another of the same sex or opposite sex or with an animal.
Proposed law deletes unnatural carnal copulation by a human being with an animal from the
definition of crime against nature.
Proposed law otherwise retains present law.
Proposed law creates the crime of sexual abuse of an animal.
Proposed law provides that
any person who willfully commits any of the following acts is guilty of sexual abuse of an
animal:
So instead of striking down the "crimes against nature law" altogether, they are simply carving out the animal portion of it and leaving the original law on the books. The original law is unconstitutional, but leave it to LA legislators to leave it untouched for political gain.
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:46 pm to YatInTheHat
quote:
"Anal sexual intercourse between two human beings shall not be deemed as a crime," part of the bill states.
good news... you can now legally PIIHB
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:48 pm to scott8811
La still allows cock fighting though
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:49 pm to slackster
So they left that wording in, but also said anal between 2 adults is legal?
That makes no sense
"Blow jobs and anal are illegal but anal is legal"
Wut
That makes no sense
"Blow jobs and anal are illegal but anal is legal"
Wut
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:53 pm to YatInTheHat
How is the sexual assault of a goat not already a violation of our laws against animal cruelty?
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:54 pm to Olric
quote:
How is the sexual assault of a goat not already a violation of our laws against animal cruelty?
Have you seen the way Goats walk around? They are practically begging for it.
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:54 pm to TH03
No, they didn't change anything about the previous law other than to take animals out:
Under this proposed law, anal intercourse would still be illegal in LA but wouldn't be enforceable because it's unconstitutional.
Remove the damn law altogether and create the new one for animal abuse. Don't carve off animal abuse and leave an unconstitutional law on the books.
The bold part would be removed, then the law would be reenacted. That's absurd.
ETA - What I'm saying is that the article in the OP is wrong. Shocker.
Under this proposed law, anal intercourse would still be illegal in LA but wouldn't be enforceable because it's unconstitutional.
Remove the damn law altogether and create the new one for animal abuse. Don't carve off animal abuse and leave an unconstitutional law on the books.
quote:
A. Crime against nature is either of the following:
10 (1) The unnatural carnal copulation by a human being with another of the
11 same sex or opposite sex or with an animal, except that anal sexual intercourse
12 between two human beings shall not be deemed as a crime against nature when done
13 under any of the circumstances described in R.S. 14:41, 42, 42.1 or 43. Emission is
14 not necessary; and, when committed by a human being with another, the use of the
15 genital organ of one of the offenders of whatever sex is sufficient to constitute the
16 crime.
The bold part would be removed, then the law would be reenacted. That's absurd.
ETA - What I'm saying is that the article in the OP is wrong. Shocker.
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 1:56 pm
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:56 pm to slackster
quote:
A. Crime against nature is either of the following: 10 (1) The unnatural carnal copulation by a human being with another of the 11 same sex or opposite sex or with an animal, except that anal sexual intercourse 12 between two human beings shall not be deemed as a crime against nature when done 13 under any of the circumstances described in R.S. 14:41, 42, 42.1 or 43. Emission is 14 not necessary; and, when committed by a human being with another, the use of the 15 genital organ of one of the offenders of whatever sex is sufficient to constitute the 16 crime.
MMMMmmmm this is getting good, Now I want to read R.S. 14:41, 42, 42.1, and 43
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:58 pm to SidewalkDawg
quote:
MMMMmmmm this is getting good, Now I want to read R.S. 14:41, 42, 42.1, and 43
Spoiler alert - they're all forms of rape or assault.
Basically the original law saws sodomy isn't a crime when it's part of a worse crime, if that makes any sense. The new law wouldn't change that. The article quoted this part:
quote:
anal sexual intercourse between two human beings shall not be deemed as a crime against nature
and didn't finish the damn statute.
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:58 pm to slackster
quote:
except that anal sexual intercourse
12 between two human beings shall not be deemed as a crime against nature when done
So that part is in the original wording?
Oh i saw what the other statutes were. Basically anal isn't a crime against nature during a rape because the rape statutes specifically list anal as a crime against the victim.
This post was edited on 4/10/18 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:59 pm to slackster
15 genital organ of one of the offenders of whatever sex is sufficient to constitute the
16 crime.
so, if you're poorly endowed, it's okay?
16 crime.
so, if you're poorly endowed, it's okay?
Posted on 4/10/18 at 1:59 pm to TH03
quote:
So that part is in the original wording?
Yes.
BTW, I'll need donations for my GoFundMe when I'm let go for researching this stuff at work.
Posted on 4/10/18 at 2:37 pm to YatInTheHat
Curious. If you were voted into office, and the majority of citizens in your district wanted sex with animals to be legal, do you have an obligation to vote in that manner?
Posted on 4/10/18 at 2:42 pm to TH03
quote:
Laws against buttsex are pretty much trying to outlaw gays. North LA tends to be more Bible belt and intolerant than south LA so it would make sense that they'd try to stop this bill from passing.
Lol idk what part of S LA you grew up in but the parts where I came from butt sex was indeed heavily frowned upon.
Me thinks you are a bit simplistic and presumptuous.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News