- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:13 pm to lsuhunt555
I only see Louisiana numbers because of this board. Heck I’ve never seen How Mississippi reports their numbers but a backlog of that amount on test conducted two months ago is ludicrous
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:13 pm to hendersonshands
quote:
so maybe you will see some of the % positives from those days decrease
Wont undo the scolding or reopen the bars
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:14 pm to TigerDude80
quote:
Today's update includes 1,741 positive cases dating back to as far as 5/28.
Criminal
Why even report 3 month old cases? It also distorts the previous peak that we are already past.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:14 pm to TigersSEC2010
Idiot won’t say anything about us having almost 3x the amount of test as a normal day. He’ll just focus on the number 3600.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:14 pm to burdman
quote:
Should be interesting this afternoon.
Not really. No changes will be made
But lots of smacking and talking down to us.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:15 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Also, I thought positives had to be reported immediately. Why are they backlogged Mack to late May, over 2 months ago?
So that JBE can do with the numbers whatever is necessary for him to justify any prolonging
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:15 pm to Cosmo
I meant it should be interesting to see what metric he reaches for to tell us how bad it is.
Because the trends for the last 10 days have been very good.
Because the trends for the last 10 days have been very good.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:16 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
It also distorts the previous peak that we are already past.
No one had an answer for this in the thread last week
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:16 pm to Cosmo
I’m am beyond frustrated by the bullshite from LDH. It’s fricking clear they have an agenda when they dump every time before a press conference
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:17 pm to LoneStar23
quote:
I’m am beyond frustrated by the bullshite from LDH. It’s fricking clear they have an agenda when they dump every time before a press conference
Well they failed today then because those numbers are great.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:17 pm to burdman
Doesn’t matter more positives is all the dumbasses that watch the news will hear about
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:18 pm to LoneStar23
Just wait till the retards show up in the YouTube comments at 2:30
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:19 pm to burdman
They’re great, but the media and JBE will only talk about total cases because the rest don’t fit the narrative.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:19 pm to burdman
quote:
Well they failed today then because those numbers are great.
They're meaningless though because they aren't up to date. So the positive rate for example will be higher than using this raw data. Doesn't matter that means the positive rate from.previous dates has to be lower to account for that. We need to focus only on the "high" rate right now.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:19 pm to danilo
quote:
6.5% positive rate
Do the backlog cases factor into this?
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:19 pm to LSUJML
quote:
The collection dates for most of the cases fall between July 28 and August 4 2020.
1741 old cases back to 5/28, 3615 total cases reported.
That means that 1874 cases are what are technically within that "most" date range.
Somewhat deceptive use of the word "most" there.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:20 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
We need to focus only on the "high" rate right now.
What's that rate?
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:20 pm to LNCHBOX
Yep. I don't know if you saw yesterday's thread but it made me think about the thread from last week with the daily positive discussion.
Basically it's impossible to have the daily % positives they're reporting based on the gross number they've reported.
Basically it's impossible to have the daily % positives they're reporting based on the gross number they've reported.
Posted on 8/4/20 at 12:21 pm to Civildawg
quote:
I only see Louisiana numbers because of this board. Heck I’ve never seen How Mississippi reports their numbers but a backlog of that amount on test conducted two months ago is ludicrous
It is not just ludicrous. It is indicative of people who are failing miserably at their jobs. Yet, we are going to entrust them to "fix" the issues?
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News