- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lisa Jean - AR 15 Bump Fire Girl
Posted on 10/5/17 at 4:58 pm to LuckySo-n-So
Posted on 10/5/17 at 4:58 pm to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
Absolutely no reason for a civilian to have such a weapon.
You might get flak for this, but I agree. I think semi auto ar's are fine but devices like bunp stocks, etc should be illegal.
Bump stops that make an ar that much like a full auto should be illegal because no law abiding citizen needs a full auto.
This post was edited on 10/5/17 at 5:04 pm
2
Posted on 10/5/17 at 4:59 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
Lisa Jean
This post was edited on 10/5/17 at 5:01 pm
Posted on 10/5/17 at 4:59 pm to Beessnax
quote:
Because
Yup. Pretty much.
If you can't defend your home with a 7+ round capacity shotgun or 19 round Glock or BOTH, then you are hanging around the wrong fricking people or you are being served a no knock warrant by a SWAT team, and there's no amount of fire power that will save you.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 5:05 pm to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
f you can't defend your home with a 7+ round capacity shotgun or 19 round Glock or BOTH, then you are hanging around the wrong fricking people or you are being served a no knock warrant by a SWAT team, and there's no amount of fire power that will save you.
It's a good thing you aren't in charge!
Posted on 10/5/17 at 5:17 pm to Beessnax
quote:
It's a good thing you aren't in charge!
Yeah...90% of Tiger Droppings would commit suicide if I was in charge. 
Posted on 10/5/17 at 7:00 pm to PoppaD
quote:
Absolutely no reason for a civilian to have such a weapon.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..."
FWIW, the "State" has been far better armed than it's citizens for a century or more. Every little bit helps.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 7:10 pm to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
Absolutely no reason for a civilian to have such a weapon.
So the Constitution is not a reason?
Posted on 10/5/17 at 7:13 pm to HubbaBubba
Bunch of betas in this thread.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 7:30 pm to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
2.) Absolutely no reason for a civilian to have such a weapon.
2nd amendment mother fricker.
This post was edited on 10/5/17 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 10/5/17 at 7:37 pm to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
2.) Absolutely no reason for a civilian to have such a weapon.
Do you have a nice house? Nice vehicle? Anything nice and fancy you treated yourself to with some saved funds? Any sports interest? Anything get your adrenaline going, maybe competing at something or just doing something solo?
Your preference for what you want. Amen brother, hope you do. But why knock the average sane man/woman who likes to shoot xyz gun at a inanimate target. Because nut jobs use them?
Guns don't walk and talk. Please just consider the answer is enhanced criteria to weed out the looney tunes from acquiring. That's the root and where the problem is. Amen
Posted on 10/5/17 at 7:43 pm to PoppaD
quote:
no law abiding citizen needs a full auto.
I applaud you sir, for checking the needs of every law-abiding citizen. I was, until your post, assuming everyone's needs are different.
How long did it take you?
Posted on 10/5/17 at 7:49 pm to Hangit
I know the NRA lobby has stroke, but this may be a battle they're not winning. Especially with the midterms upcoming.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 7:53 pm to jdd48
They already said the law need to be re-examined.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 8:02 pm to HubbaBubba
i could totally beat her up
Posted on 10/5/17 at 8:06 pm to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
2.) Absolutely no reason for a civilian to have such a weapon.
No reason your car should go over 55.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 8:11 pm to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
2.) Absolutely no reason for a civilian to have such a weapon.
Then the guberment will eventually say, no need for pistols and shotguns, we will protect you !!!!!
Posted on 10/5/17 at 8:25 pm to keepitsimple
quote:
But why knock the average sane man/woman who likes to shoot xyz gun at a inanimate target.
I'm not knocking "the average sane man/woman who likes to shoot".
I've shot guns before. It's fun af. I may or may not own a double barrel coach gun and a passed down Ruger 9mm. I may or may not have murdered many squirrels, rabbits, and waterfowl in my youth before I decided that the smell of gun cleaning solvent was not worth it.
What I am saying is that a civilian does not need a fricking machine gun, or a semi-automatic AR/AK that can be modified to fire automatically, or a 30+ round magazine (<---I could have pissed you off and called it a "clip").
If you want to fire a machine gun join the Army.
That's my opinion. That's my interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. Nothing any of you say will change it.
Also, as far as I'm concerned, the NRA is a terrorist organization.
I'll even start myself off with a downvote. HOW BOW DAH?
Posted on 10/5/17 at 9:40 pm to LuckySo-n-So
quote:
If you want to fire a machine gun join the Army.
That's my opinion. That's my interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. Nothing any of you say will change it.
Good thing there weren't a whole lot of your type when the American Revolution was fought.
ETA: Your interpretation of the 2nd Amendment flies in the face of reality. Enjoy your ignorance, though.
This post was edited on 10/5/17 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 10/5/17 at 10:08 pm to LuckySo-n-So
Trying too hard
Posted on 10/12/17 at 2:21 pm to lsucoonass
quote:
This video has been removed for violating YouTube's policy on harmful or dangerous content.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News