Started By
Message

re: Liberal Arts Majors: Did your college courses prepare you for your jobs?

Posted on 3/9/15 at 9:49 pm to
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6103 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 9:49 pm to
A good liberal arts program should prepare the critical thinking skills such that they can pick up instructions quickly and make good decisions.
Heck, when I finished my MBA in accounting, I still had to learn how to audit on the job.
Posted by CapitalCityDevil
Seattle
Member since Nov 2014
2916 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 9:49 pm to
Compare the study of his work to that of traditional literary studies. It is practically nonexistent.

My guess is that 80-90% of the people on this website don't know who DFW is without googling the name.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36387 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Sorry if fat neckbeards is a confusing term. Think of it like a "lightyear". On the outside it looks like a unit of time, but it is actually a unit of distance. "Fat neckbeard" describes a state of being, not the actual looks of the individual. It is an internet thing, I figured it made it here by now.


Ha I know what neckbeards are. My contention is that they do not make up English departments. No English department I've ever seen has had what you would call a neckbeard.

quote:

And it is very true, our colleges have barely begun teach DFW's work even though it is some of the most complex writing of the 20th-21st century.



You really don't know what you are talking about. DFW was on college syllabi when he was still alive. As far as the complexity goes, it's not any more complex than William Burroughs or any of the other writers who fall under the blanket term of "Postmodernism." He's just the most popular. There are lots of contemporary writers who are read in English departments.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109532 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 9:53 pm to
I'm not a Liberal Arts Major, and I can tell you my college education did dick to prepare me for the real world.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36387 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Compare the study of his work to that of traditional literary studies. It is practically nonexistent.



Do you have a study proving this? I just did a quick search on JSTOR. David Foster Wallace got more hits than Toni Morrison, who was the last American to win the Nobel Prize in literature.

I think you are basing a lot of this on your perception, which isn't accurate.
Posted by CapitalCityDevil
Seattle
Member since Nov 2014
2916 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 9:57 pm to
I really do know what I'm talking about. Go ask 100 liberal arts majors if they know who DFW is and you will get close to 100 "No's". I'm not making this stuff up bruh.

Burroughs wouldn't get many more positive responses, but anyone who had a decent high school literature teacher would have made his students study the Beat gen. Would be mostly kids who read Kerouac's On the Road though...
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36387 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:00 pm to
quote:

I really do know what I'm talking about. Go ask 100 liberal arts majors if they know who DFW is and you will get close to 100 "No's". I'm not making this stuff up bruh.



I'm talking about it from the people who make up departments. DFW was probably one of the youngest people to ever be read in college. And I guarantee everyone who makes up the curriculum of contemporary literature knows who he is.

quote:

I really do know what I'm talking about. Go ask 100 liberal arts majors if they know who DFW is and you will get close to 100 "No's". I'm not making this stuff up bruh.


Why liberal arts? If we are speaking specifically about English departments, then I'd wager most upper level English students know and have read DFW. I assigned DFW to my comp students many years ago, and he was on the syllabus of many of instructors and professors there. If you enlarge the search to liberal arts, then you would be right.
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
81271 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

Do you look like a small contemplative boy IRL? Is that you in your avi??



You've literally sat in a booth on the same bench as me. Do you not remember?
Posted by TIGRLEE
Northeast Louisiana
Member since Nov 2009
31493 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

Posted by mattz1122 He wasn't being serious. He's just some simpleton from N.LA.


Don't you guard a cash register at a chilies of some sort?
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36387 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

Burroughs wouldn't get many more positive responses, but anyone who had a decent high school literature teacher would have made his students study the Beat gen. Would be mostly kids who read Kerouac's On the Road though...



We were talking about complexity. Foster Wallace isn't among the most complex writing in the 20th century. My point is that he isn't anymore complex than other "Postmodern" writers, as he's a product of them. The fact that he produced a work like Infinite Jest so young is extremely impressive, but it's taking ideas that have existed for a long time, and using them in interesting ways.

Infinite Jest isn't Ulysses, nor is it The Tunnel, or The Recognitions, nor is DFW on the level of someone like James Baldwin, who is viciously underrated. DFW was smart, but he was apart of that crewe of Chabon, Franzen, Lenthem, Foer, and Zadie Smith among others who became famous precisely because they were young when they wrote long winding works. American literature has a fetish for young writers. The quality of the work speaks for itself, but all those writers became famous at the same time for that particularly reason (their youth).
Posted by Kamtheman106
In that number.
Member since Mar 2012
404 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:06 pm to
No.

/thread
Posted by DrinkDrankDrunk
Member since Feb 2014
836 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:09 pm to
quote:

Compare the study of his work to that of traditional literary studies. It is practically nonexistent.

My guess is that 80-90% of the people on this website don't know who DFW is without googling the name.


He was a good, especially considering much of what is published now, but he's not Chaucer or Shakespeare. And you don't need to pay money to have someone explain him to you. Well Infinite Jest, maybe, but it would probably take a semester. The only thing I spent a whole semester on was the Divine Comedy and I needed that spoon fed to me.
Posted by CroakaBait
Gulf Coast of the Land Mass
Member since Nov 2013
3978 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:12 pm to
quote:

I ask because the firm where I work employs interns, and most of them have zero idea of how to do anything before they get to us. (They are always recent graduates.) 

My lib arts degree allowed me to become a jack of all trades. Not specific trades, mind you, but versatile enough to adapt to any working environment and be successful.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36387 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

And you don't need to pay money to have someone explain him to you. Well Infinite Jest, maybe, but it would probably take a semester.


That's the thing. You've been reading postwar literature in America, DFW was nothing new. But he did make all those ideas palatable and readable for the average reader. Pyncheon is absolutely unreadable at times, as are many of the other authors of that era. The thing with DFW is that Infinite Jest is long as hell. It's hard to sustain interest for that long with a modern novel.
Posted by CapitalCityDevil
Seattle
Member since Nov 2014
2916 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:14 pm to
I only picked DFW as an example, and I assumed we both understood that anyone inside an English department would know famous authors.

I think that you are being a little narrow with your thoughts on DFW's youth when he wrote Infinite Jest. I agree with everything you've said in this comment to an extent. DFW is famous because his writing was brilliant. Also, using the argument of him being a product of "postmodern" writers as to say that he can't live up to them I believe to be foolish and extremely conservative.
Posted by CapitalCityDevil
Seattle
Member since Nov 2014
2916 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

But he did make all those ideas palatable and readable for the average reader.
This statement is preposterous (said with a VERY British accent). The average reader wouldn't be able to finish Infinite Jest.

Pynchon is one of my favorite authors btw, Gravity's Rainbow is quite the work of art itself. Though his writing became less complex after it.
This post was edited on 3/9/15 at 10:19 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32836 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:19 pm to
What does Dallas-Fort Worth have to do with liberal arts degrees?
Posted by ShermanTxTiger
Broussard, La
Member since Oct 2007
10918 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:20 pm to
Yep. Learned to read, write, think and communicate my recommendations. Harder to break through into Mgt with a liberal arts degree but once there it was a huge advantage. Went back later and got my MBA. Now have the best of both worlds.
Posted by Feral
Member since Mar 2012
12499 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:20 pm to
Poly sci grad here who landed in business.

One major advantage my educational experience afforded me was the practice and repetition of long form writing. When you're constantly having to churn out 10 to 15 page theses, you tend to become a fairly effective writer. I've worked with a litany of business majors over the years who have horrible grammar and could barely string a sentence together via email, let alone create a document or brief.
Posted by CroakaBait
Gulf Coast of the Land Mass
Member since Nov 2013
3978 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 10:20 pm to
I was waiting for it.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram