- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lawyers of the OT, do y’all use AI?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 10:26 am to Houstiger
Posted on 8/1/25 at 10:26 am to Houstiger
Yeah it's pretty good about questions. You obviously have to go through them, but AI has created some questions that showed angles I hadn't though of before.
It's good at comparing documents, too. Medical records, depositions, etc. Finding differences/similarities in the reporting/testimony.
Then you can use the responses (and your own work) to build your own documents, then have the AI analyze the synergy for a trial//depo notebook.
It's good at comparing documents, too. Medical records, depositions, etc. Finding differences/similarities in the reporting/testimony.
Then you can use the responses (and your own work) to build your own documents, then have the AI analyze the synergy for a trial//depo notebook.
0
Posted on 8/1/25 at 10:27 am to SlowFlowPro
I think that’s already happening to some degree.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 10:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is how Lawyers are often dumb and extremely dumb when it comes to anything outside of their legal comfort zone.
I also think attorneys have subconsciously internalized what “attorney answers” look and sound like. So when an LLM spits out an answer that sounds like something an attorney would say, they are predisposed to believe it. The problem is that LLMs are vastly better at sounding correct than they are at being correct
Posted on 8/1/25 at 11:13 am to Joshjrn
quote:
So when an LLM spits out an answer
I keep thinking yall are talking about tax attorneys. This is getting confusing baw
Posted on 8/1/25 at 11:17 am to NIH
quote:
I haven’t read into it much but I’d imagine there are privilege concerns about dumping sensitive records into these apps too.
Yep. There's no fricking way I'm inputting any kind of confidential client information or training it using client work product. There's too much risk there at this time.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 11:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
AI (and in the past, Google) is good for when I have a broad legal concept/argument that I know isn't novel, so I can type in the general argument/issue and they'll provide the term. Then with that "proper term", I can do actual research on an actual research platform.
The problem is I feel like google from 10 years ago was way way better than current AI at doing this task. At least in my experience.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 11:38 am to NIH
quote:
Poor areas (most places in the South)
Hey man...what about the Gumbo
Posted on 8/1/25 at 11:56 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
I keep thinking yall are talking about tax attorneys. This is getting confusing baw
Yeah, the alphabet soup is reaching critical mass
But what people are calling “AI” is, almost without exception, actually just Large Language Models. If people kept that in mind, they would be vastly less confused and disappointed when artificial “intelligence” is anything but.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 12:13 pm to SouthPlains
quote:
kid right out of law school making $60k.
Damn bro? How old are you and how long has it been since you hired someone right out of law school?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 12:19 pm to arseinclarse
Amateurs. if you get a pro subscription you can use the operator function and log in to Lexis or Westlaw and let it do the research for you.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News