- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 5/22/25 at 2:04 pm to dagrippa
Posted on 5/22/25 at 2:04 pm to dagrippa
quote:
Ok now I know you are a troll.
So you are calling Julian a Liar? He admitted he was posting his own opinions on April 2 and would not longer be doing that anymore and only posting professional News Updates
"Dear all,
After 5,661 emotional days on Twitter/X, I have decided to stop posting my personal opinions and updates here, as well as commenting on others’ posts.
I will not be moving to any other platform to do so instead.
From now on, this account will solely release professional content, primarily what I publish @BILD, as well as some objective map updates and analysis, plus interviews with other outlets.
I had a lot of fun engaging here, but it has also caused me many problems, which I now wish to avoid in the future.
Thank you all for your interest and trust over these 15 years."
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
0
Posted on 5/22/25 at 2:25 pm to John Barron
quote:
Yes...You are very slow. You just proved it once again by not understanding a report from a Bild reporter that I post does not mean the report originated from John Barron.
Every post is by John Barron,
You often edit the original, you post parts of the originals and you’ve been caught putting out disinformation time after time.
You also add in your opinion to push your agenda.
Everything you post is for a reason and it is everything to do with turning people against Ukraine and their defense of their homeland.
You proclaim to be a regular citizen taking 10 seconds here are there to post information.
That in itself is a lie.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 2:31 pm to doubleb
quote:
Every post is by John Barron
Incorrect. If I make a Post that has nothing but a Tweet that post and information originated from the author of the Tweet. If I would not post a Tweet and make a post like " This information comes from a friend who I did business with in Romania" That would be a post by John Barron. I never make posts like those. That would be CitizenK you are thinking of.
quote:
You often edit the original
Incorrect and a Lie Simple Jack. You can't edit someone else's Tweet which is what I post. You are so retarded that you make up lies that can't be true because it is is impossible to do
Now you have gone Full Retard 
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 5/22/25 at 2:53 pm to John Barron
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:09 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
If Russia could do it, they would have already done it. There is no benefit to fighting a war this way, especially as the longer it goes on, the more time Europe has to rearm.
They have no manufacturing base to rearm- shortest forcast is 5-6 years. They neutered themselves post WW2 and relied heavily on US base, which ironically is tapped out too. Ukraine isn't lasting 5-6 years even if little Z mobilizes children and women.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:11 pm to PoppedRiser
Already three years more than predicted.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:14 pm to doubleb
quote:
What is Trump waiting for?
What is Russia waiting on?
Apprentice firehoser third class, Pop A Lock.
You wouldn't understand it if it hit you in the face. You're so illiterate historically and have such poor deductive reasoning that it's futile for you to try and understand geopolitics. Stick to college sports or some local cityhall politics and intrigue that's more up to your level of education and cognition. Don't take it the wrong way, but you try to insert yourself in discussions you have no ability to respond intelligently or frankly fully comprehend..
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:16 pm to doubleb
quote:
Already three years more than predicted.
Who predicted?
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:22 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
They have no manufacturing base to rearm- shortest forcast is 5-6 years.
What? Rheinmetall has either opened or re-purposed 6 new factories by my count. I could go through the list of contractors who are expanding production, but I think your timeline is not accurate.
NATO has plenty of industrial capacity. The biggest hurdles the Russians have solved for them, thankfully.
quote:
They neutered themselves post WW2 and relied heavily on US base, which ironically is tapped out too.
The US manufacturing base is not tapped out. This isn't WW2 man.
And you didn't answer the question. If Russia could rip Ukraine a new a-hole, as you put it, what exactly are they waiting for?
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 3:28 pm
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:24 pm to John Barron
He has announced or threatened to make a buffer zone several other times. Ho hum.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:24 pm to doubleb
Guess who's back...?
And yes, the band's playing the "Preußens Gloria". It's been a long time since that was last heard in Lithuania...
LINK
quote:
Today in Vilnius, Germany’s “Litauenbrigade” was inaugurated. It is a historic and resolute step in NATO’s collective defence.
And yes, the band's playing the "Preußens Gloria". It's been a long time since that was last heard in Lithuania...
LINK
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:24 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
Who predicted?
Uh, the Russians themselves, by virtue of their original battle plan? You are really bad at this.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:27 pm to John Barron
quote:
That is exactly what I post.
Except you spam links. Some thoughtful curation would go a long way, but you don't really have the ability to be discerning with your sources. You are trying your best, poor thing.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:45 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Uh, the Russians themselves, by virtue of their original battle plan? You are really bad at this.
I think there might be some distinctions you can make between "planning" and "expecting".
They absolutely tried to "take the head off the snake" within a few days with blitzkrieg style tactics and taking over the airport to bring in troops, vehicles, and equipment.
We know they had plans to attempt to end the war that early, because of these tactics and because of how the troops were equipped.
However, after the failed "blitz" they also fairly quickly established lines that Ukraine really hasn't made much of a dent in since, which also points to at least a somewhat organized plan should the blitz fail (which it did).
Given that, I don't personally buy the "they actually believed they would take Kyiv in 3 days" thing, but I understand why people do. And we likely won't ever know with 100% certainty.
To simplify the distinction, I can "plan" to retire at 50 while being skeptical that I will actually be able to, and still have a backup plan should it not happen. That isn't me predicting I will retire at 50.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:50 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
quote:Already three years more than predicted.
Who predicted?
Why ask the village idiot? Go find out for yourself. Ask your teacher.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:55 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Uh, the Russians themselves, by virtue of their original battle plan? You are really bad at this.
So no source, just you talking out your arse. Didn't you proclaim you have a tranny parady to go to?
quote:
Why ask the village idiot? Go find out for yourself. Ask your teacher.
Then why as the village idiot you repeat nonsense you have no way to back up. That's more lazy than stupid.
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 3:57 pm
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:56 pm to VolSquatch
In terms of who actually said the invasion would be '3 days,' I believe that was Lukashenko who said it in an interview posted on Feb. 28th 2022.
Secondly, in 2014, Putin claimed he could take Kyiv in less than 2 weeks. Given what we know, I don't they expected the operation to take more than a month.
What is pretty odd is that they never gained overwhelming air superiority through massing air assets before trying to take Hostomel or in the invasion generally. That fact suggests some things, either they couldn't coordinate those assets all at once or they thought they didn't need them. Both of which don't speak highly of the planning phase of the operation. There were some early Ukrainian claims saying that their troops found documents suggesting a very short operation, not more than a month, but I don't know if that has been independently corroborated.
Secondly, in 2014, Putin claimed he could take Kyiv in less than 2 weeks. Given what we know, I don't they expected the operation to take more than a month.
What is pretty odd is that they never gained overwhelming air superiority through massing air assets before trying to take Hostomel or in the invasion generally. That fact suggests some things, either they couldn't coordinate those assets all at once or they thought they didn't need them. Both of which don't speak highly of the planning phase of the operation. There were some early Ukrainian claims saying that their troops found documents suggesting a very short operation, not more than a month, but I don't know if that has been independently corroborated.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 3:59 pm to PoppedRiser
quote:
So no source, just you talking out your arse.
Lol, I did give two sources for the claims that taking Kyiv would be a short operation. Second, we can look at the first phase of the invasion and use 'deductive reasoning,' combining all the evidence to suggest a conclusion. We don't need any outside sources other than the fact of the battles that did occur at the time and place we say they did. If we were to go through an early timeline of the war, what do you think it would suggest? Let's see some of this 'deductive reasoning' in action little guy.
Posted on 5/22/25 at 4:00 pm to crazy4lsu
In 2014, Putin could take Kiev in 2 weeks.
Lukashenko of Belarus? Okay. In other words, you have no source for 3 day crap, just a silly meme.
Like Ukros screaming "Russian shite go F-k yourself" before surrendering.
You've been reduced to trolling before, when you crashed out and said you'll start trans parades and turn everyone gay. Troll.
Lukashenko of Belarus? Okay. In other words, you have no source for 3 day crap, just a silly meme.
Like Ukros screaming "Russian shite go F-k yourself" before surrendering.
quote:
Lol, I did give two sources for the claims that taking Kyiv would be a short operation. Second, we can look at the first phase of the invasion and use 'deductive reasoning,' combining all the evidence to suggest a conclusion. We don't need any outside sources other than the fact of the battles that did occur at the time and place we say they did. If we were to go through an early timeline of the war, what do you think it would suggest? Let's see some of this 'deductive reasoning' in action little guy.
You've been reduced to trolling before, when you crashed out and said you'll start trans parades and turn everyone gay. Troll.
This post was edited on 5/22/25 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 5/22/25 at 4:01 pm to PoppedRiser
Lol you are so bad at this. They aren't sending their best. Sad!
Page 4880 of 5046
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News