- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:10 pm to crazy4lsu
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:10 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Yes, and apparently you can't read the entire paragraph
Ok, here is the rest, where you continued to say it was about the private entities and not the politicians
quote:
As in, you are blaming private entities and making them responsible for a geopolitical situation they did not cause. What is driving the spending is the geopolitical situation, not anything else. Do you know how we know this?
By this stilted logic, any attempt by any country anywhere to reorganize their military is technically 'war profiteering' which is so fricking stupid I guess it isn't a surprise that you believe it.
quote:
it is amazing you can't comprehend very simple arguments
Well you apparently can't even read, or comprehend your own argument, so I don't feel too bad.
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:14 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
Ok, here is the rest, where you continued to say it was about the private entities and not the politicians
Brother, the MIC, or the military-industrial complex means something very very specific. Apparently the issue is that you don't know what it means.
quote:
I even said in MY original paragraph that it specifically WASN'T money laundering, and that people throw the term around for a lot of different criminal financial acts.
Yeah I read that, which adds to my position that you don't seem to use words very carefully.
quote:
Well you apparently can't even read, or comprehend your own argument, so I don't feel too bad.
Try again. Invoking the MIC means something very specific.
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:16 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Brother, the MIC, or the military-industrial complex means something very very specific. Apparently the issue is that you don't know what it means.
I think the opposite problem is true, you don't know what it means
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:17 pm to VolSquatch
this thread has politardaids
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:18 pm to VolSquatch
Brother, it is literally in the name. Hence why I made reference to private parties, because the industrial aspect of that complex is by definition made up of private capital. Do you understand the history of the term or how it is used?
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:33 pm to crazy4lsu
Crazy that after 20 years in the middle east just concluded people have trouble with the concept of "politicians prolong war -> companies sell lots of shite for the war -> companies give benefits to politicians who prolonged the war"
This post was edited on 7/19/24 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:40 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
politicians prolong war -> companies sell lots of shite for the war -> companies give benefits to politicians who prolonged the war
Okay, so we both agree you don't understand what the MIC means. Cool. And this is a toddler's understanding of things.
Because, like I said, those companies were going to find lots of work by virtue of the sea change in government policy. As in, regardless of 'prolonging' any conflict, the budgets and plans are set for the next half-decade to decade. Unless you think all of this happens overnight.
The moment Russia invaded and the allies responded ensured the same outcome without reference to prolonging or ending any conflict. That is what you can't seem to understand for some reason.
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:48 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
As in, regardless of 'prolonging' any conflict, the budgets and plans are set for the next half-decade to decade.
"Countries won't change plans or adjust budgets or order new stuff that they weren't necessarily planning on ordering to replace what was given to Ukraine" is literally a retarded position
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:52 pm to VolSquatch
Russian tourists cancel Crimea holidays en-masse, Ukrainian military intelligence says
by Chris York July 19, 2024 4:26 PM
Russian tourists have canceled summer holiday bookings in occupied Crimea en-masse, amid concerns over the "difficult security situation," Ukraine's military intelligence (HUR) said on July 19.
In a post on Telegram, HUR claimed 80% of trips to Sevastopol had been canceled while the rate across the peninsula as a whole was more than a third.
"The mass refusal of Russians to vacation in Crimea was influenced by the unreliable and deadly work of the invaders' air defense system," HUR said.
Russia has a number of military bases in Crimea, most notably in Sevastopol, home of the Kremlin's Black Sea Fleet, though successful Ukrainian strikes forced Moscow to pull out much of its naval forces from the peninsula earlier this month.
Despite often being within sight of active military bases, some Russian tourists continue to vacation at the Black Sea beach resorts.
Last month, three people reportedly died when Russian air defenses intercepted Ukrainian missiles over the peninsula.
While HUR's claims about the cancelation rates could not be verified, earlier news reports paint a picture of a Crimean tourist industry in dire trouble.
In May, it was reported that local health resorts were offering discounts of up to 40% in an attempt to lure tourists to the peninsula.
The Kyiv Independent
by Chris York July 19, 2024 4:26 PM
Russian tourists have canceled summer holiday bookings in occupied Crimea en-masse, amid concerns over the "difficult security situation," Ukraine's military intelligence (HUR) said on July 19.
In a post on Telegram, HUR claimed 80% of trips to Sevastopol had been canceled while the rate across the peninsula as a whole was more than a third.
"The mass refusal of Russians to vacation in Crimea was influenced by the unreliable and deadly work of the invaders' air defense system," HUR said.
Russia has a number of military bases in Crimea, most notably in Sevastopol, home of the Kremlin's Black Sea Fleet, though successful Ukrainian strikes forced Moscow to pull out much of its naval forces from the peninsula earlier this month.
Despite often being within sight of active military bases, some Russian tourists continue to vacation at the Black Sea beach resorts.
Last month, three people reportedly died when Russian air defenses intercepted Ukrainian missiles over the peninsula.
While HUR's claims about the cancelation rates could not be verified, earlier news reports paint a picture of a Crimean tourist industry in dire trouble.
In May, it was reported that local health resorts were offering discounts of up to 40% in an attempt to lure tourists to the peninsula.
The Kyiv Independent
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:52 pm to VolSquatch
Except
I don't even know what this means. We have verifiable instances of countries changing policy and course, such as in the documents I mentioned.
You don't seem to understand how any of this works.
quote:
Countries won't change plans or adjust budgets or order new stuff that they weren't necessarily planning on ordering to replace what was given to Ukraine" is literally a retarded position
I don't even know what this means. We have verifiable instances of countries changing policy and course, such as in the documents I mentioned.
You don't seem to understand how any of this works.
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:55 pm to crazy4lsu
Cletus doesn't understand a lot. He's just upset that his SSI and Welfare checks aren't larger.
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:56 pm to crazy4lsu
You're placing a lot of importance on who started it, when it really doesn't matter at all for my argument
..... to better fund the war effort. Who makes the money during a war?
quote:
We have verifiable instances of countries changing policy and course, such as in the documents I mentioned.
..... to better fund the war effort. Who makes the money during a war?
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:57 pm to CitizenK
quote:
SSI
That the name of the German unit your Ukrainian grandfather was in?
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:58 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
to better fund the war effort. Who makes the money during a war?
Why do you talk about things which clearly aren't true? The documents I'm referring to reference one country and one country alone. Not a surprise you didn't know that.
Posted on 7/19/24 at 2:59 pm to crazy4lsu
You're really floundering here dude. You don't even know what you disagree with at this point 
Posted on 7/19/24 at 3:02 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Seriously GFY you pro war guys are the worst of the worst
This is my favorite. In your world Putin -- who started the fricking war -- is the good guy. And those of us who want him to go home and end the war .... we're the "pro war guys".
If you guys want to see the face of mental illness...this is it.
Posted on 7/19/24 at 3:04 pm to VolSquatch
Brah, you’ve said things which aren’t clearly true and you expect me to just move on?
And I’ve been quite specific. There was no need for any politicians to prolong the war in order to funnel money to the defense industry because of what occurred in February of 2022. As in, their future windfall was assured outside of the immediate political situation because the larger geopolitical situation is settled. I’m pretty sure I’ve said this already.
And I’ve been quite specific. There was no need for any politicians to prolong the war in order to funnel money to the defense industry because of what occurred in February of 2022. As in, their future windfall was assured outside of the immediate political situation because the larger geopolitical situation is settled. I’m pretty sure I’ve said this already.
This post was edited on 7/19/24 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 7/19/24 at 3:06 pm to No Colors
quote:
And those of us who want him to go home and end the war .... we're the "pro war guys".
There are some here who don't react to new information though. They default to "Putin started if, he should just go home" when that isn't going to happen. Obviously if he just packed his shite and left that would be better for everyone (except him, but who gives a frick).
Unfortunately we have to live in a world where we react to and deal with the actual conditions in front of us, not our ideal scenarios in our heads.
Posted on 7/19/24 at 3:09 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
There was no need for any politicians to prolong the war in order to funnel money to the defense industry because of what occurred in February of 2022.
I addressed this in my post 'brah".
If you believe the west killed the 2022 peace talks, then that's obviously them prolonging it.
If you don't we still have examples... such as the way we have gradually trickled weapons deliveries and permissions for them to use the weapons however they want is another example. I am personally against aid, but if we are going to give them aid we should give them the best shite we have AND let them strike deep into Russia to end it ASAP.... we aren't doing that, aka prolonging the war.
And I will say again I built out a hypothetical there, I'm defending a hypothetical that I don't necessarily believe 100% but trying to steelman it.
This post was edited on 7/19/24 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 7/19/24 at 3:21 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
If you believe the west killed the 2022 peace talks, then that's obviously them prolonging it.
You realize there are multiple explanations for this, right? And do you think a ceasefire then would have been the end of hostilities? Because, again, the immediate reaction of the Allies meant/means only one thing.
quote:
If you don't, the way we have gradually trickled weapons deliveries and permissions for them to use the weapons however they want is another example.
What? It’s more of an example of how a large coalition has to work.
quote:
And I will say again I built out a hypothetical there, I'm defending a hypothetical that I don't necessarily believe 100% but trying to steelman it.
You not only argued it poorly, but also showed no interest in the realities of what the European security situation was before and after February of 2022 and seem impervious to any suggestion that defense companies are going to see a windfall through no effort of the West to create that situation.
You are remarkably ignorant about geopolitics and keep talking about it using only buzzwords you don’t understand. Like you said, maybe you should start dealing with the ‘actual conditions in front of us’ rather than approach things as dishonestly as you have. I don’t for a second believe you were ‘steelmaning’ anything or that for you this is even a hypothetical. Your singular goal here seems to be to try to make this thread worse, just like the cum dumpsters who stop by every once in a while and pretend that this thread has any bearing on what happens in Ukraine.
Popular
Back to top



1


