Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 4/24/23 at 10:44 am to
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 10:44 am to
quote:

$5 trillion? Less? More?



How is this a realistic figure? You think the US would spend around 50 times what they've spent so far? Are you retarded?

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 10:46 am to
quote:

How much are you willing to spend to rebuild?



Do you think money spent by governments just disappears? Do you understand how investments work?
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8165 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 10:47 am to
I believe we have about $300B of Russian's money we impounded. I think we reimburse ourselves for the military aid and give the rest to Ukraine to rebuild.

I think the EU should bear the majority of the rebuilding cost.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 10:50 am to
quote:

I think the EU should bear the majority of the rebuilding cost.



I think we will see healthy capital investment from the US into post-war Ukraine, as all indications are that joining the EU will bolster their long-term prospects in terms of GDP.
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8165 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 10:51 am to
I answered your question, will you answer mine?
quote:

What about the other 98.57%? Are you as worried about that as you are about the 1.43%?
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 10:51 am to
The EU should be hearing most of the cost for the war and the rebuild but Europe is pretty fricking useless so daddy has to pay for everything once again.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 10:55 am to
quote:

The EU should be hearing most of the cost for the war and the rebuild but Europe is pretty fricking useless so daddy has to pay for everything once again.



Europe is weak compared to the US by design. And in truth, the restrictive monetary policy Europe pursued after 2008 shows the limits of austerity, as their recovery wasn't nearly as pronounced as the US's.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
15677 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:00 am to
Interesting and would signify an amphibious crossing
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138902 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:06 am to
quote:

How is this a realistic figure? You think the US would spend around 50 times what they've spent so far? Are you retarded?

It's not. I started high to see if that was something you'd be willing to spend. Give me a realistic number you'd say is a cut off.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138902 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:07 am to
quote:

What about the other 98.57%? Are you as worried about that as you are about the 1.43%?

Of course
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8165 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:09 am to
quote:

Of course


How many posts have you made about it?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138902 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Do you think money spent by governments just disappears? Do you understand how investments work?

Yeah, Iraq and Afghanistan were excellent investments
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:18 am to
quote:

upgrayedd


Situational fiscal conservative. I missed your "conservatism" regarding spending when Trump was President but I'm sure you are consistent.

When you do a formation run in the 82nd somebody in the ranks will scream out "how far we goin?" and then then everybody responds "all the way"' So how much will it cost? whatever it takes.

Some good news on the rebuild cost though. About 400 billion of Russian cash has been siezed via sanction. Currently sitting in Western banks drawing interest. More being collected everyday because the Russians arent very smart.
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8165 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:21 am to
The point I'm making is this:

You have been vocal in this thread about our spending on Ukraine, have you been equally vocal about all the other government spending?

It matters because it establishes if you are just a troll or not. If you have been arguing against all of the spending, not just the Ukraine spending, then I wouldn't class you as a troll. However, if you only complain about the spending on Ukraine and not about all the other spending, then you come across as a Russian talking point troll.

Which are you?
Posted by canes is too salty
Member since Apr 2023
62 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:22 am to
The Tuck has been cucked.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:23 am to
quote:

It's not. I started high to see if that was something you'd be willing to spend. Give me a realistic number you'd say is a cut off.



There isn't a real cut off, because of the way the aid is structured and the fact that the conflict could go on a long time. You're just upset that the money is being spent at all and don't understand anything about government spending, which has been clear. It isn't like you are going to propose spending that money domestically.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Europe is weak compared to the US by design.


No matter how many times this is explained, or how slowly you type they refuse to understand this.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39820 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Yeah, Iraq and Afghanistan were excellent investments


Again, you don't appear to understand how investments work. Nicely done.
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28324 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:31 am to
quote:

upgrayedd


And you know you can buy equity shares in most defense contractors right?

AND, you are correct there will be a frick ton of cash in Ukraine for the rebuild. So instead of being helpless and frustrated on the internet figure out a way to slice off a piece of that cash.

A Danish officer I met in Iraq and I set up a company to remove uxo. Approved in Ukraine (but they dont have any money) and awaiting approval through the EU (they do have money). Lots of ways to skin kitty cats.
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4669 posts
Posted on 4/24/23 at 11:36 am to
quote:

How much cash are we giving them? How much are we spending to replace weapons we are giving Ukraine?

These are two big questions and it’s tough to get an answer.





quote:

Between January 2022 and January 2023, the U.S. committed more than $26 billion to Ukraine in financial assistance, according to data compiled by the Ukraine Support Tracker at the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, a German think tank. That’s about a third of the roughly $77 billion in total aid noted by Kiel, including humanitarian and military assistance, pledged by the U.S. government. The numbers represent money promised, not entirely distributed.

Another tally from the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget places the total amount of aid approved by Congress in 2022 for supporting the Ukrainian government and allies at about $113 billion. That includes about $27 billion in economic support funds, $7.9 billion for international disaster assistance and $6.6 billion to support and relocate refugees.


LINK

ETA:
This post was edited on 4/24/23 at 11:37 am
first pageprev pagePage 2669 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram