- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:16 pm to Lakeboy7
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:16 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:The Ukraine military says “Starlink is the main way units on the battlefield communicate.” But they must know less about it than you.
If Starlink were turned off right now the Ukrainians would have crystal clear satellite communications going forward.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:20 pm to crazy4lsu
Well you’re an academic, so I assumed you’d feel that way
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:26 pm to MoarKilometers
quote:
quote:
Zelenski Ukraine terrorist regime stopped. No major counterattack coming before winter now. Mobiks arriving en mass. Its all over but the cryin.
We remember your last great prediction...
quote:
The Azov Sea is Russia’s now. Goodnight.
Less than 10 minutes later the Kertch Bridge got rocked. It almost made me wonder if he is the real puppetmaster.
But more likely just:

Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:29 pm to Obtuse1
quote:Change the analogy anyway you'd like.
Maybe it is just an abusive ex-husband beating on her again.
The point is that given the stakes, one fellow is ready and willing to kill, and give up his life. To the other, she's little more than a roll in the hay. Choosing to fight for her will get him shot in the head. Not a great choice.
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 6:35 pm
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:34 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:Wait!
Macron was right. What the Kremlin wanted required months, if not years, of negotiations.
Ukraine committing to abide by Minsk and standing down from NATO would take years? When Zelensky was prepared to go there in April, it wasn't going to take years.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:41 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
The Ukraine military says “Starlink is the main way units on the battlefield communicate.” But they must know less about it than you.
For unsecure communication maybe. Important military information, lets just use the firing solution data used to sink the Moskva as an example, would be sent via a secure link.
Starlink is not a secured network. Luckily for the Ukrainians the Russians are so inept most military communication doesnt have to go out over an secured network.
When the Ukrainians speak to the Pentagon throughout the day its not on Starlink right.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:41 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Well you’re an academic, so I assumed you’d feel that way
Fair enough. I should note that I look like a skeezy French DJ who may or may not try to sell fake X to underage girls. I was also described as someone who would stalk Avril Lavigne circa 2005.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:42 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:You'd be good with mutually assured destruction to prevent self-determination of Russian ethnics in Donbas? Really?
and the US should have said russia in ukraine will trigger WWIII.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:44 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Ukraine committing to abide by Minsk and standing down from NATO would take years?
No, to arrange this:
quote:
The statement added that, “if the conditions are met,” a diplomatic path should allow the organization of “a meeting at the highest level in order to define a new peace and security order in Europe.”
quote:
When Zelensky was prepared to go there in April, it wasn't going to take years.
A negotiation which required security guarantees, which again, are not simple negotiations. The fact that Putin was negotiating in bad-faith in February directly informed the reasoning as to why the West didn't want to negotiate with Putin in April. But alas.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:44 pm to NC_Tigah
sure, why not? if russia gets to threaten nuclear war to get what it wants whenever it wants it, we should too
lets threaten to nuke saudi arabia while we are at it over oil
and china over threatening taiwan
why not?
lets threaten to nuke saudi arabia while we are at it over oil
and china over threatening taiwan
why not?
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:44 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:Let's try this again.
For unsecure communication maybe. Important military information, lets just use the firing solution data used to sink the Moskva as an example, would be sent via a secure link.
quote:
Sources familiar with the outages said they suddenly affected the entire frontline as it stood on September 30. “That has affected every effort of the Ukrainians to push past that front,” said one person familiar with the outages who spoke to CNN on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive conversations. “Starlink is the main way units on the battlefield have to communicate.”
CNN
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:47 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:I didn't ask you about a threat.
sure, why not? if russia gets to threaten nuclear war to get what it wants whenever it wants it, we should too
I asked if you'd be good with mutually assured destruction to prevent self-determination of Russian ethnics in Donbas?
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:47 pm to NC_Tigah
no
but why not just threaten that we would? i mean if it works?
but why not just threaten that we would? i mean if it works?
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:49 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
the entire frontline
Found your problem
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:50 pm to DabosDynasty
Does Elon even know that Ukraine had leased the base at Sevastopol to Russia and Russia abused that lease.
What a twatwad.
On April 27, 2010, Russia and Ukraine ratified the Russian Ukrainian Naval Base for Gas treaty, extending the Russian Navy's lease of the Sevastopol base for 25 years after 2017 (through 2042) with an option to prolong the lease for another 5 years (through 2047).
What a twatwad.
On April 27, 2010, Russia and Ukraine ratified the Russian Ukrainian Naval Base for Gas treaty, extending the Russian Navy's lease of the Sevastopol base for 25 years after 2017 (through 2042) with an option to prolong the lease for another 5 years (through 2047).
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:50 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:Because prudence dictates one never threaten something he is unwilling to carry through.
but why not just threaten that we would?
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:52 pm to Lakeboy7
quote:My problem is you're illiterate?
Found your problem
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:52 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:but what if we act like we are? i mean its not like anyone would be able to tell
Because prudence dictates one never threaten something he is unwilling to carry through.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:53 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Because prudence dictates one never threaten something he is unwilling to carry through.
Think this through with respect to giving in to Russian demands right now. Because you can ask the same question of Russia. Why would they use a nuclear weapon which could potentially affect people they want to annex? That doesn't strike you as odd?
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:54 pm to NC_Tigah
Coverage didnt extend to Russian controlled areas.
Popular
Back to top



1




