- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 10/17/22 at 5:34 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 10/17/22 at 5:34 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
You're willing to "press Putin" to the last Ukrainian. We both understand that.
Do you cry yourself to sleep every night because France, the Dutch Republic, and Spain were willing to "press George" to the last colonist?
Posted on 10/17/22 at 5:46 pm to TBoy
quote:No.
And then Russia invaded. Is this your evidence that Putin wanted or would have agreed to a deal?
It is the evidence the Kremlin was serious about the situation, made that clear to Macron. Macron brought absolutely nothing to the table in return.
These "negotiations" had been ongoing for months with no progress. In fact, to the contrary, PotatoBrain & Co escalated the Ukraine-to-NATO dialogue, and fed those discussions to the Kremlin.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 5:46 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:seems like us threatening to use nukes on russia would have done the trick am i right
Knowing what you know now, how would you suggest we could have avoided this Ukrainian catastrophe?
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 5:47 pm
Posted on 10/17/22 at 5:48 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
It is the evidence the Kremlin was serious about the situation, made that clear to Macron. Macron brought absolutely nothing to the table in return.
The evidence is the fact that despite attempts to negotiate, the Kremlin was still preparing for an invasion, which undercuts the idea they were ever serious about a negotiated agreement in the first place. There are several propositions that are at odds here, and yet the blame is always exclusively the West's. Your line of argument is extremely strange.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 5:55 pm to Obtuse1
Not to continue to press on Elon, but is anyone suspicious as to why once the Pentagon made preparations to fully fund Starlink in Ukraine, Elon immediately withdrew his request for funding (under the guise of doing good deeds)?
I'm suspicious he wants to continue being a major player in this conflict, having autonomy over service rendered in the warzone. My hope is that no reason other than a savior complex exist for this move.
I'm suspicious he wants to continue being a major player in this conflict, having autonomy over service rendered in the warzone. My hope is that no reason other than a savior complex exist for this move.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 5:56 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:Russia says NATO in Ukraine will trigger WWIII.
seems like us threatening to use nukes on russia would have done the trick am i right
So if mutually assured destruction "does the trick", yeah, you're right.
It's kind of like two guys fighting over a girl. If one of them is married to her, the stakes are unbalanced. Ukraine as a neutral neighbor, a buffer borderland, is far more important to Russia than Ukraine-to-NATO is to the West.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 5:58 pm to SlimTigerSlap
Zelenski Ukraine terrorist regime stopped. No major counterattack coming before winter now. Mobiks arriving en mass. Its all over but the cryin.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 5:58 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
What Russia is relying on is you asking this same question if it makes a move for Latvia or some other similar Baltic country.
First of all, I seriously doubt that Russia is relying on GT23 from TD.com for anything, and second, Latvia is a NATO country so that’s a completely different ballgame. Using a NATO country potentially being attacked as a reason to retaliate with nuclear weapons because of Ukraine is a cop out and frankly, is being used to dupe people into thinking it’s the only option.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:01 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:and the US should have said russia in ukraine will trigger WWIII. this could have all been avoided
Russia says NATO in Ukraine will trigger WWIII.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:03 pm to SlimTigerSlap
quote:
Pentagon made preparations to fully fund Starlink in Ukraine, Elon immediately withdrew his request for funding (under the guise of doing good deeds)?
If Starlink were turned off right now the Ukrainians would have crystal clear satellite communications going forward.
Two things here, the DoD is a big believer in redundancy of systems and all the grownups know Musk is a flake and cant be trusted.
Musk should have made his extortion demand earlier in the war.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:06 pm to Lakeboy7
What extortion? Musk is literally providing high speed internet to the entirety of Ukraine for free and has been since the outset of the war. The Musk hate in this thread is ridiculous and nonsensical.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:06 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
First of all, I seriously doubt that Russia is relying on GT23 from TD.com for anything
Lol, tell that to OML, who pretends that people nominally supporting Ukraine are genocidal warmongers.
But I'm talking about the sentiment expressed, not that you expressed the sentiment specifically. That line of argument will absolutely be used if Russia wants the Baltics at some point in the future.
quote:
Using a NATO country potentially being attacked as a reason to retaliate with nuclear weapons because of Ukraine is a cop out and frankly, is being used to dupe people into thinking it’s the only option.
But the issue is that Russia is dictating the security of another country. That's the only issue. The options are between the two states in question. That Russia is willing to use nuclear weapons to achieve very short-term strategic aims is telling.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:08 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
What extortion? Musk is literally providing high speed internet to the entirety of Ukraine for free and has been since the outset of the war. The Musk hate in this thread is ridiculous and nonsensical.
That isn't my claim, and I don't hate the guy at all (far from it). I admire Elon which is precisely the reason I'm so frustrated.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:08 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:What attempts?
The evidence is the fact that despite attempts to negotiate
Macron brought nothing to the table. Nothing! Hell, Ukraine was not even willing to fully abide the Minsk Accords, much less withdraw from NATO discussions.
The Kremlin made no secret it was massing troops on the border. Macron was talking about "months of negotiations". Gathered Armies are rarely that patient.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:09 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
It's kind of like two guys fighting over a girl. If one of them is married to her, the stakes are unbalanced. Ukraine as a neutral neighbor, a buffer borderland, is far more important to Russia than Ukraine-to-NATO is to the West.
It is apropos that you did not consider the girl's opinion on the matter.
Maybe it is just an abusive ex-husband beating on her again.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:12 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
But the issue is that Russia is dictating the security of another country. That's the only issue. The options are between the two states in question. That Russia is willing to use nuclear weapons to achieve very short-term strategic aims is telling.
That’s why I said the question is whether or not Ukraine is worth it. We have an ironclad pact with the Baltics. We’ve already gone above and beyond any agreements we have with Ukraine…much more so than any other European power.
Now one card argue whether or not the US still should be a part of NATO. I’d personally argue against it. The whole prosperity dividends from a secure Europe I don’t really buy into. Frankly I think that’s a bunch of mumbo jumbo that academics and statesmen like to site around the cigar room and jerk each other off to to make themselves more relevant than they really should be.
But the fact is we are a member of NATO and and an attack one is an attack on all. So we have to respond, no question about it.
This post was edited on 10/17/22 at 6:12 pm
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:13 pm to Obtuse1
quote:
It is apropos that you did not consider the girl's opinion on the matter.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:13 pm to BrianKellyRespecter
quote:
Zelenski Ukraine terrorist regime stopped. No major counterattack coming before winter now. Mobiks arriving en mass. Its all over but the cryin.
We remember your last great prediction...
quote:
The Azov Sea is Russia’s now. Goodnight.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:14 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Macron brought nothing to the table.
My dear god. Please read that article I posted carefully to see what Macron actually wanted. It's in the first few paragraphs of the NYT article. It's literally the beginnings of every multi-lateral agreement, unless you think Macron can negotiate on behalf of other nations and NATO itself.
quote:
The Kremlin made no secret it was massing troops on the border. Macron was talking about "months of negotiations". Gathered Armies are rarely that patient.
Macron was right. What the Kremlin wanted required months, if not years, of negotiations. Think things through when combined with Russian actions. We can surmise one thing pretty strongly here, yet you can't seem to pin down what was going on.
Posted on 10/17/22 at 6:15 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Now one card argue whether or not the US still should be a part of NATO. I’d personally argue against it. The whole prosperity dividends from a secure Europe I don’t really buy into. Frankly I think that’s a bunch of mumbo jumbo that academics and statesmen like to site around the cigar room and jerk each other off to to make themselves more relevant than they really should be.
You are entirely wrong, myopic, naïve, etc. Thank god you aren't in charge. Good grief.
Popular
Back to top



1




