- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Karen Read murder trial - Not guilty on main - guilty of OUI(DUI) only
Posted on 6/28/24 at 5:52 pm to LSUGrrrl
Posted on 6/28/24 at 5:52 pm to LSUGrrrl
quote:
How could all 12 people not agree on a Not Guilty verdict? There’s more reasonable doubt in the states case than there is reasonable belief.
Because there are good people, although also gullible and naive, that believe any narrative that authorities push.
1
Posted on 6/28/24 at 6:01 pm to Saintsisit
I have no doubt she was saying “did I hit him” and these losers twisted it against KR.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 10:05 am to Ghost of Colby
I would think the jury wants to wrap this up before the holiday this week.
It has to be one or two jurors that are holding out that don't want to return a not guilty for whatever reason.
It has to be one or two jurors that are holding out that don't want to return a not guilty for whatever reason.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 10:25 am to civiltiger07
I really wish I would've started keeping us with this from the beginning.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 11:35 am to JDPndahizzy
The judge just gave the jury the Tuey-Rodriguez instruction and sent them back. If they come back again, she will declare a mistrial.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 11:39 am to AlxTgr
So I'm listening to a podcast and they've only done this beginning part of the trial, but they are usually pretty down the middle.
My questions are, how is the defense rectifying all the people she seemingly said " I hit him"? Also, how are the explaining the busted tail light pieces at the scene?
My questions are, how is the defense rectifying all the people she seemingly said " I hit him"? Also, how are the explaining the busted tail light pieces at the scene?
Posted on 7/1/24 at 11:46 am to Civildawg
quote:She either didn't say it at all, or she said, "Did I hit him?"
My questions are, how is the defense rectifying all the people she seemingly said " I hit him"?
quote:Are you asking about the prosecution? That's the part that's most convincing to me for not-guilty. We know she backed into a vehicle. We know the light was only cracked at one point. And, we know the pieces were only found on the second search, after some of the cabal had been in close contact with the vehicle.
Also, how are the explaining the busted tail light pieces at the scene?
Posted on 7/1/24 at 11:48 am to AlxTgr
It doesn't sound like the jury is going to change based on articles saying they told the judge they are "deeply divided".
Posted on 7/1/24 at 11:50 am to Gris Gris
Agreed. I have seen some commentators say the State will absolutely retry the case if a mistrial. I find that hard to believe.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 12:06 pm to AlxTgr
The jury's note said they are "fundamentally divided on difference of opinion and state of mind".
From reports inside the court room one of the jurors was acting noticeably different during the new juror instruction read. Kind of sounds like that juror may be the loan holdout.
From reports inside the court room one of the jurors was acting noticeably different during the new juror instruction read. Kind of sounds like that juror may be the loan holdout.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 12:12 pm to AlxTgr
quote:
Agreed. I have seen some commentators say the State will absolutely retry the case if a mistrial. I find that hard to believe
At the very least, they should find out what the votes were if they can get that information, before making a decision.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 12:41 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
It doesn't sound like the jury is going to change based on articles saying they told the judge they are "deeply divided".
Very concerning but that's a major boon for KR
Posted on 7/1/24 at 1:43 pm to idlewatcher
Mistrial has been declared.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 1:47 pm to AlxTgr
hate this for KR. I'm sure some in the community will still say she did it.
maybe the feds will turn up something that affects how this case proceeds?
maybe the feds will turn up something that affects how this case proceeds?
This post was edited on 7/1/24 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 7/1/24 at 1:57 pm to civiltiger07
quote:
hate this for KR. I'm sure some in the community will still say she did it.
maybe the feds will turn up something that affects how this case proceeds?
None of this happens without King Alcohol.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 2:04 pm to AlxTgr
now Proctor can go find the real killer.
ETA: This is not a W for Karen. CW will run it back so she is not free yet.
The fact still remains that JO was NOT killed by a car so this should be the end of it. Corrupt Canton won't let it be and is out to get KR.
ETA: This is not a W for Karen. CW will run it back so she is not free yet.
The fact still remains that JO was NOT killed by a car so this should be the end of it. Corrupt Canton won't let it be and is out to get KR.
This post was edited on 7/1/24 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 7/1/24 at 2:16 pm to jclem11
quote:
This is not a W for Karen.
This is certainly a W. And the remaing jury pool is now tainted since the media has been beating the police corruption drum for weeks now.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 2:17 pm to KosmoCramer
The DA released a statement that they do intend to retry the case.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 2:23 pm to civiltiger07
It'll to be interesting to see if the feds do anything in the meantime.
Posted on 7/1/24 at 2:27 pm to KosmoCramer
I hope we find out what the votes were and the issues they were stuck on.
Page 7 of 158
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News