Started By
Message

Jury Finds Woman Innocent in Protecting her Dog from a Cop

Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:25 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422689 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:25 pm
West Virginia, son

quote:

Trooper Seth Cook came to the Hupps' house on May 9, 2015, in response to a dispute between a neighbor and Ryan's stepfather. There Cook encountered Buddy, a Labrador-husky mix who was chained outside the house. The dog, whom Hupp describes as "a big baby," ran toward Cook, barking, and Cook backed up. Even though the dog had reached the end of his chain and Cook was not in any danger, he drew his pistol.


quote:

After he heard about the case, Schles contacted Hupp and offered to represent her for free. "I thought it was outrageous, this girl is being charged for standing in her yard doing nothing but saying, 'Don’t shoot my dog,'" he said. According to Photography Is Not a Crime (PINAC), Cook "testified that he was not afraid of the dog, but was following training that required him to kill all dogs that approach him, even if it was chained and wagging its tail as Buddy was doing in this case."


quote:

Hupp told PINAC her case hinged on her husband's video, which they did not have for weeks after the incident because Cook confiscated the phone, which he was unable to access because it was protected by a password. "Without that video, it's just my word against a state trooper," she said. "Nobody is going to believe my word over law enforcement."\


thank god for encryption
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11707 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:28 pm to
But terrorists yo. Apple hand over that software.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101920 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Cook "testified that he was not afraid of the dog, but was following training that required him to kill all dogs that approach him, even if it was chained and wagging its tail as Buddy was doing in this case."


That's fricked up.
Posted by UserName69
Member since Sep 2014
1613 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

According to Photography Is Not a Crime (PINAC)


WTF is this?
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59678 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:34 pm to
Really is
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422689 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:34 pm to
i'd imagine an advocacy group that fights laws enacted to make filming police (in public) a crime
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:34 pm to
Sounds like a group against police protection against video
Posted by GaryMyMan
Shreveport
Member since May 2007
13498 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Cook "testified that he was not afraid of the dog, but was following training that required him to kill all dogs that approach him, even if it was chained and wagging its tail as Buddy was doing in this case."


Wat?

quote:

WTF is this?

Clearly it's an organization that needs to exist. WTF is a cop thinking confiscating a phone from someone for recording an obstruction arrest?
This post was edited on 3/8/16 at 12:41 pm
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
20119 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:35 pm to
I have a hard time believing that's true. It's more likely that dickhead cop was justifying his actions by lying or at least exaggerating. There is no way that he was "required" by policy to shoot the dog even though he did not feel threatened.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Cook "testified that he was not afraid of the dog, but was following training that required him to kill all dogs that approach him, even if it was chained and wagging its tail as Buddy was doing in this case."
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422689 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:36 pm to
he testified to that, per the article, so i doubt the police would allow him to lie about that. that was probably their defense

"it's fricked up, but it's within our regulatory power" essentiallly
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35354 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

he testified to that, per the article, so i doubt the police would allow him to lie about that. that was probably their defense



Probably true, but da frick kinda policy is that? So say for whatever reason, the cop doesn't have his gun or taser on him. Is he supposed to beat the dog to death?

I can understand a policy that says a dog may be killed upon a reasonable fear of attack. I cannot understand a policy that says all dogs that approach MUST be killed.
Posted by gmrkr5
NC
Member since Jul 2009
14892 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Cook "testified that he was not afraid of the dog, but was following training that required him to kill all dogs that approach him, even if it was chained and wagging its tail as Buddy was doing in this case."


whoa whoa whoa cops are being trained to kill people's pets now??? so if i call the cops for some reason and he comes to my house to file a report and my dog "approaches" him he's trained to kill it?!

wow... im not going to speculate what i would do.

cop would probably have to kill me as well. which im sure he'd have no problem doing
This post was edited on 3/8/16 at 12:40 pm
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

o if i call the cops for some reason and he comes to my house to file a report and my dog "approaches" him he's trained to kill it?!



Yep.


Ive been saying it for a LOONG time.

Doglives matter.
Posted by tigerinthebueche
Member since Oct 2010
36791 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

testified that he was not afraid of the dog, but was following training that required him to kill all dogs that approach him, even if it was chained and wagging its tail as Buddy was doing in this case."


if this is true then every LEO should be sent to camps for reeducation and all LE bureaucrats should be fired.



Posted by gmrkr5
NC
Member since Jul 2009
14892 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:41 pm to
and cops wonder why people hate them
Posted by Yunel Escobar
Member since Apr 2010
1025 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:45 pm to
This is so sad

She should not have been arrested for stopping him from shooting her dog. Geez
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64613 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Cook "testified that he was not afraid of the dog, but was following training that required him to kill all dogs that approach him, even if it was chained and wagging its tail as Buddy was doing in this case."


That's fricked up.



Yep. Very fricked up.
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
23830 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:49 pm to
LE is becoming comically stupid.
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17260 posts
Posted on 3/8/16 at 12:51 pm to
FWIW, according to some press release when he first became a trooper, he was homeschooled.

Homeschooled + state trooper = Oy vey!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram