- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Judge who OK'd lowering bar on Cantrell recall signed the petition, didn't disclose it
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:05 pm
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:05 pm
LINK
quote:
As organizers of a campaign to recall Mayor LaToya Cantrell fought last month to reduce the number of signatures they needed, the judge presiding over the case did not disclose that she herself had signed the public recall petition.
Orleans Parish Civil District Judge Jennifer Medley, who last week endorsed an unusual deal between recall organizers and Secretary of State Kyle Ardoin’s office to trim the recall threshold by 5,000 names, added her signature to the petition on Dec. 19, recall campaign records show.
quote:
Even before then, she gave recall organizers a series of favorable rulings. She rejected efforts by election officials to have the case tossed before testimony was heard. When recall leader Eileen Carter took the stand, Medley refused to allow election officials to question Carter on the number of signatures the organizers had collected.
quote:
Advocates and experts in judicial ethics agreed that Medley should have revealed her support for Cantrell’s ouster, but were divided on whether she violated any ethical rules or should have recused herself from the legal challenge.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:10 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Jesus Christ, why?
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:12 pm to LordSaintly
wouldnt q judge that didnt sign it be in a similar predicament if they ruled against it?
well at least the same argument could be made.

well at least the same argument could be made.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:15 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
Jesus Christ, why?
Inside job. Skew the process. Classic move.

Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:17 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:we are speaking of New Orleans
lowering bar
The bar is always lowered

Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:22 pm to gaetti15
That’s what I was thinking, this could roll both ways.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:24 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
we are speaking of New Orleans
The bar is always lowered
which in itself says a lot coming from SuperSaint.

Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:25 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Advocates and experts in judicial ethics agreed that Medley should have revealed her support for Cantrell’s ouster, but were divided on whether she violated any ethical rules or should have recused herself from the legal challenge.
What if this was about a recall of the governor? Every single judge in the state would be in this mess.
She probably should have disclosed but she signed a settlement offer. She didn't make a ruling.
I guess since it's just Orleans Parish maybe they could bring in a judge from outside the parish to handle this.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:26 pm to LSUFanHouston
Judge did it on purpose
Cantrell gonna pay her off
Recalls never work
Cantrell gonna pay her off
Recalls never work
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:27 pm to LSUFanHouston
What rule/ethics could have been broken?
Does a judge have to reveal who they voted for before ruling on a matter that involves an elected official?
Does a judge have to reveal who they voted for before ruling on a matter that involves an elected official?
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:28 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Well there it is. This is what they’ll use to get it thrown out
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:28 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
we are speaking of New Orleans The bar is always lowered
Yet it feels a little safer since you have been gone.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:34 pm to jcaz
quote:
Well there it is. This is what they’ll use to get it thrown out
Maybe maybe not...Dems do it all the time. Laches and sheit with no standing.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:36 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Wasn’t it basically just a ministerial act? No real adjudicating to do just confirm accuracy?
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:37 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
LaToya being bullied again. John Georges isn’t going to allow it or a recall.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:38 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Advocates and experts in judicial ethics agreed that Medley should have revealed her support for Cantrell’s ouster, but were divided on whether she violated any ethical rules or should have recused herself from the legal challenge.
Name the “advocates and experts”. What is the specific ethical code they are split on?
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:44 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
What rule/ethics could have been broken? Does a judge have to reveal who they voted for before ruling on a matter that involves an elected official?
Yeah I don’t see an issue. Judges are people too that deserve a voice/opinion.
Now one would hope a judge would check their opinions at the door and do their job objectively when the time comes, but nonetheless they’re still allowed to be human and have opinions.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:45 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Had to be Trudy White's relative.
Posted on 3/8/23 at 6:46 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Good. Don't ruin the recall local media. Focus on the disaster that is the DAs office.
Popular
Back to top
