- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge vacates Adnan Syed's conviction and orders a new trial
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:04 pm to TheCaterpillar
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:04 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
While I think he did it, there was absolutely not enough evidence to prove he did it.
0
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:15 pm to Pettifogger
I only listened to the first episode of season 2. Guessing it didn't go well?
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:16 pm to hendersonshands
how long before he is smanging sarah koenig?
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:18 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:He was convicted by a jury, right?
While I think he did it, there was absolutely not enough evidence to prove he did it.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:18 pm to hendersonshands
Damn thats huge. I still don't know if he did it or not.
I wonder how Jay feels about this.
I wonder how Jay feels about this.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:19 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:
While I think he did it, there was absolutely not enough evidence to prove he did it.
quote:
He was convicted by a jury, right?
If you think you are saying something insightful, you are not.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:19 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:
He was convicted by a jury, right?
yes.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:20 pm to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:Just a question. Relax.
If you think you are saying something insightful, you are not.
ETA: Thanks for outing yourself as someone incapable of having a rational conversion.
This post was edited on 6/30/16 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:21 pm to BLIZZAKE7
quote:
how long before he is smanging sarah koenig?
A few hours before she is reported missing.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:21 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
the crux of their case was the testimony of a liar
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:22 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:I couldn't remember whether it was judge or jury. It's been a while.
yes.
I think you have to give credence to the jury's decision. They were present in court and saw everything live (evidence, expressions, demeanor, reactions, etc.). We got a slanted presentation. Therefore, I don't think it's right for someone to say "not enough evidence to convict."
This post was edited on 6/30/16 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:22 pm to Paige
multiple liars.
I would love what jay & the two detectives came up with during 6 hrs of not recorded interrogation.
I would love what jay & the two detectives came up with during 6 hrs of not recorded interrogation.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:23 pm to hendersonshands
I think he's innocent.
How are people saying they think he's guilty "but there was not nearly enough evidence?" Some clairvoyant MFs in here.
There was more evidence to suggest he COULD NOT have done this than evidence that one could even use to lean towards guilt.
How are people saying they think he's guilty "but there was not nearly enough evidence?" Some clairvoyant MFs in here.
There was more evidence to suggest he COULD NOT have done this than evidence that one could even use to lean towards guilt.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:24 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:You might want to listen to the podcast again and review some of the material on r/serialpodcast
I think you have to give credence to the jury's decision. They were present in court and saw everything live. We are getting a slanted presentation.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:24 pm to hendersonshands
He's probably just going to join ISIS once he gets out.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:25 pm to hendersonshands
I'm not sure if he did it or not, but I am sure that his trial and conviction were fricked up.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:26 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:
I couldn't remember whether it was judge or jury. It's been a while.
I think you have to give credence to the jury's decision. They were present in court and saw everything live (evidence, expressions, demeanor, reactions, etc.). We got a slanted presentation. Therefore, I don't think it's right for someone to say "not enough evidence to convict."
Dude
The testimony has been proven false, there was weak physical evidence, the timeline was complete bullshite, and maybe most notably, Adnan's lawyer had dementia or something and completely fricked her client over by not doing even close to satisfactory job in his defense.
I think he did it, but the shite that was AND wasn't presented at trial is just absurd. No way any jury in the country convicts him if they knew everything that should have been presented. No way.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:27 pm to GRTiger
quote:
I think he's innocent.
How are people saying they think he's guilty "but there was not nearly enough evidence?" Some clairvoyant MFs in here.
There was more evidence to suggest he COULD NOT have done this than evidence that one could even use to lean towards guilt.
Because we THINK he's guilty we're clairvoyant?
His phone being with Jay has not been explained.
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:28 pm to JBeam
quote:Probably, but I don't really care. I'm more interested in the judge's reasoning and the fallout.
You might want to listen to the podcast again and review some of the material on r/serialpodcast
How are they going to have a trial 16 years after the fact?
Posted on 6/30/16 at 4:28 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:After all of this. IDK how you can be 100% that he did it. That completely flies in the face of your argument.
The testimony has been proven false, there was weak physical evidence, the timeline was complete bullshite, and maybe most notably, Adnan's lawyer had dementia or something and completely fricked her client over by not doing even close to satisfactory job in his defense.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News